Virtual reality-based medical training and assessment: The multidisciplinary relationship between clinicians, educators and developers

References

• Asaro PM. Transforming society by transforming technology: The science and politics of participatory design. Account Manage Inf Technol 2000; 10(4)257–290
   Google Scholar
• August J. Joint application design: The group session approach to system design. Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ 1991
   Google Scholar
• Bødker S, Iversen OS, Staging a professional participatory design practice: Moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-computer interaction, 2002 October 19–23. Aarhus, Denmark
   Google Scholar
• Carmel E, Whitaker RD, George JF. PD and joint application design: A transatlantic comparison. Commun ACM 1993; 36(6)40–48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaye ALM. User participation in system development revisited. Inform Manage 1995; 28(5)311–323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champion H, Gallagher AG. Surgical simulation – a “good idea whose time has come”. Br J Surg 2003; 90(7)767–768
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chou B, Handa VL. Simulators and virtual reality in surgical education. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2006; 33(2)283–296
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawson S. Procedural simulation: A primer. Radiology 2006; 241(1)17–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dix A, Finlay J, Abowd GD. Human-computer interaction. Pearson Education, Harlow, England 2004
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004; 79(10)570–581
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich MJ. Practice makes perfect: Risk-free medical training with patient simulators. JAMA 2002; 288(22)2808–2812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grottke O, Ntouba A, Ullrich S, Liao W, Fried E, Prescher A, Deserno TM, Kuhlen T, Rossaint R. Virtual reality-based simulator for training in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103(4)594–600
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He J, King RW. The role of user participation in information systems development: Implications from a meta-analysis. J Manage Inform Syst 2008; 25(1)301–331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockemeyer C, Nussbaumer A, Lövquist E, Aboulafia A, Breen D, Shorten G, Albert D. Applying a web and simulation-based system for adaptive competence assessment of spinal anaesthesia. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2009; 5686: 182–191
   Google Scholar
• Howell JM, Higgins CA. Champions of technological innovation. Admin Sci Q 1990; 35(2)217–341
   Google Scholar
• Issenberg SB, Gordon MS, Gordon DL, Safford RE, Hart IR. Simulation and new learning technologies. Med Teach 2001; 23(1)16–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issenberg SB, Mcgaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005; 27(1)10–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John NW. Design and implementation of medical training simulators. Virtual Real 2008; 12(4)269–279
   Google Scholar
• Karsh BT. Beyond usability: Designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13(5)388–394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneebone R. Simulation in surgical training: Educational issues and practical training. Med Educ 2003; 37(3)267–277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneebone R, Aggarwal R. Surgical training using simulation. Br Med J 2009; 338: 1001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulcsár ZM, Lövquist E, Fitzgerald AP, Aboulafia A, Shorten GD. Testing haptic sensations for spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011; 36(1)12–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, Dalsgaard T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Schroeder TV, Ottesen BS. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: Randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2009; 338: b1802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lettl C. User involvement competence for radical innovation. J Eng Technol Manage 2007; 24(1–2)54–75
   Google Scholar
• Lettl C, Gemünden HG. The entrepreneurial role of innovative users. J Business Industrial Marketing 2005; 20(7)339–346
   Google Scholar
• Lövquist E, Aboulafia A, Breen D, Shorten GD, Zhang D, Albert D, Designing a simulation-supported adaptive assessment system for spinal anaesthesia. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, 2008 September 29–October 1, Crete, Greece. pp 397–402
   Google Scholar
• Mackay H, Carne C, Beynon-Davies P, Tudhope D. Reconfiguring the user: Using rapid application development. Soc Stud Sci 2000; 30(5)737–758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloy R, Stone R. Science, medicine, and the future. Virtual reality in surgery. Br Med J 2003; 323(7318)912–915
   Google Scholar
• McKeen JD, Guimaraes T. Successful strategies for user participation in systems development. J Manage Inform Syst 1997; 14(2)133–150
   Google Scholar
• Muller MJ. Participatory design: The third space in HCI. Handbook of HCI. Erlbaum, Mahway NJ 2003
   Google Scholar
• Patel VL, Kaufman DR. Medical informatics and the science of cognition. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5(6)493–502
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roguin A, Beyar R. Real case virtual reality training prior to carotid artery stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75(2)279–282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas E, Bowers CA, Rhodenizer L. It is not how much you have but how you use it: Toward a rational use of simulation to support aviation training. Int J Aviat Psychol 1998; 8(3)197–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas E, Burke CS. Simulation for training is effective when. Br Med J 2002; 11(2)119–120
   Google Scholar
• Salas E, Rosen MA, Held JD, Weissmuller JJ. Performance Measurement in Simulation-Based Training: A Review and Best Practices. Simul Gaming 2009; 40(3)328–376
   Google Scholar
• Salas E, Wilson KA, Burke CS, Priest HA. Using simulation-based training to improve patient safety: What does it take?. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005; 31(7)363–371
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Satava R. Emerging trends that Herald the future of surgical simulation. Surg Clin North Am 2010; 90(3)623–633
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Satava RM, Jones SB. Current and future applications of virtual reality for medicine. Proc IEEE 1998; 86(3)484–489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalese RJ, Obeso VT, Issenberg SB. Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23(Suppl. 1)46–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: Results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002; 236(4)458–463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D, Maddern GJ. Surgical simulation: A systematic review. Ann Surg 2006; 243(3)291–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijssen AS, Schijven MP. Contemporary virtual reality laparoscopy simulators: Quicksand or solid grounds for assessing surgical trainees?. Am J Surg 2010; 199(4)529–541
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomann G, Caelen J, Proposal of a new design methodology including PD and SBD in minimally invasive surgery. In: Proceedings of the 12th IFToMM World Congress, 2007 June 18–21, Besançon, France
   Google Scholar
• Vozenilek J, Huff JS, Reznek M, Gordon JA. See one, do one, teach one: Advanced technology in medical education. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11(11)1149–1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: An ethical imperative. Simul Healthcare 2006; 1(4)252–256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar