Student experiences of creating and sharing material in online learning

References

• Bennett S, Maton K, Kervin L. The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. Br J Educ Technol 2008; 39: 775–786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth A. Blogs, wikis and podcasts: The ‘evaluation bypass’ in action. Health Inf Libr J 2007; 24: 298–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns A, Towards produsage: Futures for user-led content production. In: Sudweeks F, Hrachovec H, Ess C, editors. Proceedings of the cultural attitudes towards communication and technology, 2006 June 28–1 July, Tartu, Estonia, pp 275–284
   Google Scholar
• Bruns A, Produsage, Generation C, and their effects on the democratic process. In: Proceedings of the Media in Transition 5, 2007 April 27–29, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [Retrieved 2011 February 1]. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available from: http://web.mit.edu/comm-forum/mit5/
   Google Scholar
• Coldwell J, Craig A, Paterson T, Mustard J. Online students: Relationships between participation, demographics and academic performance. Electron J e-Learn 2008; 6: 19–30
   Google Scholar
• Collis B, Moonen J. Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: Quality perspectives. Educ Media Int 2008; 45: 93–106
   Google Scholar
• de Vaujany F-X. IT conceptualization: Respective contributions of sociology and information systems. J Inf Tech Impact 2005; 5: 39–58
   Google Scholar
• Goth G, 2008. Are social networking sites growing up? IEEE Distrib Syst Online 9:3
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Potts HWW, Wong G, Bark P, Swinglehurst D. Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: A systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Q 2009; 87: 729–788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie JT, Wigfield A, Barbosa P, Perencevich KC, Taboada A, Davis MH, Scafiddi NT, Tonks S. Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. J Educ Psychol 2004; 96: 403–423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond M. A review of recent papers on online discussion in teaching and learning in higher education. J Asynchronous Learn. Networks 2005; 9: 9–23
   Google Scholar
• Harasim L. Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education 2000; 3: 41–61
   Google Scholar
• Harden RM. Approaches to research in medical education. Med Educ 1986; 20: 521–531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver CE, Duncan RG, Chinn CA. Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educ Psychol 2007; 42: 99–107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes B, Joshi I, Lemonde H, 2008. To 2.0 or Not to 2.0 – Have Junior Doctors Already Answered The Question? [Internet] Presentation at Medicine 2.0, Toronto, Canada, 5 Sep 2008. [Retrieved 2011 February 1]. Available from: http://www.medicine20congress.com/ocs/index.php/med/med2008/paper/view/92 [Published Sep 2008]
   Google Scholar
• Issroff K, Del Soldato T. Incorporating motivation into computer-supported collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of European conference on artificial intelligence in education, (Brna P, Paiva A, Self JA, Editors), 1996 September 30–October 2, Ficha Tecnica, Lisbon. Lisbon, Portugal: Edições Colibri
   Google Scholar
• JISCEffective Practice in, a Digital Age [Internet]. JISC Innovation Group, Bristol. [Published 2009]. Available from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/effectivepracticedigitalage.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jones A, Issroff K. Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Comput Educ 2005; 44: 395–408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen A. The cult of the amateur: How today's internet is killing our culture. Doubleday, New York, NY 2007
   Google Scholar
• Kim JS. The effects of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic achievement, self-concept, and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Educ Rev 2005; 6: 7–19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard L, Albert M, Levinson W. Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. BMJ 2008; 337: a567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn State Learning Design Community Hub. January 2008. Online Discussion Questions [Internet]. [Retrieved 2011 February 1]. Available from: http://ets.tlt.psu.edu/learningdesign/crafting_question
   Google Scholar
• Potts HWW. Is e-health progressing faster than e-health researchers?. J Med Internet Res 2006; 8: e24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky M. Listen to the natives. Educ Leadership 2006; 63: 8–13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riehle D, How and why Wikipedia works: An interview with Angela Beesley, Elisabeth Bauer, and Kizu Naoko. In: Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on wikis, 2006 August 21–23. Odense, Denmark. New York: ACM Press. pp 3–8
   Google Scholar
• Sandars J. Developing competences for learning in the age of the internet. Educ Prim Care 2009; 20: 337–422
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandars J, Homer M, Pell G, Crocker T, 2010. Web 2.0 and social software: the medical student way of e-learning. Med Teach Early Online:1–5
   Google Scholar
• Ward R, 2008. The Potential and Challenges of Web 2.0 in the Education of Healthcare Professionals [Internet]. Presentation at Medicine 2.0, Toronto, Canada, 4 Sep 2008. [Retrieved 2011 February 1]. Available from: http://www.medicine20congress.com/ocs/index.php/med/med2008/paper/view/137
   Google Scholar
• Ward R, Moule P, Lockyer L. Adoption of Web 2.0 technologies in education for health professionals in the UK: Where are we and why?. Electron J e-Learn 2009; 7: 165–171
   Google Scholar