1,159
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Supporting traditional PBL with online discussion forums: A study from Qassim Medical School

&
Pages S20-S24 | Published online: 12 Mar 2012

References

  • Adesope T, Adesope O, Ojeme C. Traditional and online forms of education: Proposing a common ground. In Bonk CJ, Lee MM, Reynolds T, editors. 2008, Proceedings of the world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education, 2008 November 17–21. Las Vegas, NV, USA, Chesapeake, VA: AACE. pp 2071–2076
  • Al Robaee A, AlZolibani A, Al Shobaili H, Barima I, Almoteri B. Students’ perception of problem-based learning: Experience of Qassim Medical College, KSA. Tanta Med J 2009; 4: 261–269
  • Alamro A. Blended problem-based learning: Using technology to overcome face-to-face drawbacks and enhance PBL advantages at Qassim Medical School, Saudi Arabia. Center for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Dundee 2010
  • Albanese M, Mitchell S. Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad Med 1993; 68: 52–81
  • Althaus SL. Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions. Commun Educ 1997; 46: 158–174
  • Azer S. Navigating problem-based learning. Elsevier, SydneyAustralia 2007
  • Beadle M, Santy J. The early benefits of a problem-based approach to teaching social inclusion using an online virtual town. Nurs Educ Pract 2008; 8: 190–196
  • Biesenbach-Lucas S. Asynchronous discussion groups in teacher training classes: Perceptions of native and non-native students. JALN 2003; 7: 24–46
  • Blankson J, Kyei-Blankson L. Nontraditional students’ perception of a blended course: Integrating synchronous online discussion and face-to-face instruction. J Interact Learn Res 2008; 19: 421–438
  • Cheaney JD. Problem-based learning in an online course: A case study. Int Rev Res Open Dist Learn 2006; 6: 1–18
  • Chen C, Jones K. Blended learning vs. traditional classroom settings: Assessing effectiveness and student perceptions in an MBA accounting course. J Educators Online 2007; 4: 1–15
  • Davis M, Harden R. AMEE medical education guide no. 15: Problem-based learning: A practical guide. Med Teach 1999; 21: 130–140
  • de Leng BA, Dolmans DHJM, Muijtjens AMM, van der Vleuten CP. Student perceptions of a virtual learning environment for a problem-based learning undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Educ 2006; 40: 568–575
  • Des Marchais J. A student-centred, problem-based curriculum: 5 years’ experience. CMAJ 1993; 148: 1567–1572
  • Dodd L. The impact of problem-based learning on the information behavior and literacy of veterinary medicine students at University College Dublin. J Acad Librarianship 2007; 33: 206–216
  • Dunkel P, Mishra S, Berliner D. Effects of note taking, memory, and language proficiency on lecture learning for native and nonnative speakers of English. TESOL Q 1989; 23: 543–549
  • Dzakiria H, Mustafa C, Bakar H. Moving forward with Blended Learning (BL) as a pedagogical alternative to traditional classroom learning. MOJIT 2006; 3: 11–18
  • Edmunds S, Brown G. Effective small group learning: AMEE guide no. 48. Med Teach 2010; 32: 715–726
  • Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE guide 32: e-Learning in medical education part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach 2008; 30: 455–473
  • Ellis A. Student-centred collaborative learning via face-to-face and asynchronous online communication: What's the difference. In Kennedy G, Keppell M, McNaught C, Petrovic T, editors. Meeting at the crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 2001 December 9–12. The University of Melbourne. Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 2001; 169–178
  • Finucane P, Johnson S, Prideaux D. Problem-based learning: Its rationale and efficacy. Med J Aust 1998; 168: 445–447
  • Garnham C, Kaleta R, 2002. Introduction to hybrid courses. Teach Technol Today 8(March):8
  • Gooding K. Problem based learning online. In Proceedings of the ASET Conference, 2002 July 7–10. 2002, Melbourne, Australia
  • Gould T. Hybrid classes: Maximizing institutional resources and student learning. In Proceedings of the 2003 ASCUE Conference, 2003 June 8–12. 2003, Myrtle Beach, SC
  • Huang H. Student perceptions in an online mediated environment. Int J Instr Media 2002; 29: 405–423
  • Johnston A, Tinning R. Meeting the challenge of problem-based learning: Developing the facilitators. Nurs Educ Today 2001; 21: 161–169
  • Khoo HE. Implementation of problem based learning in Asian medical schools and students’ perceptions of their experience. Med Educ 2003; 37: 401–409
  • Klimova B. Blended learning. In Research, reflections and innovations in integrating ICT in education. 2009, Vol. 2. Spain: Formatex. pp 705–708 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.formatex.org/micte2009/book/705-708.pdf
  • Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1991
  • Mason R, Rennie F. Elearning: The key concepts. Routledge, London 2006
  • Meyer K. Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. JALN 2003; 7: 55–65
  • Norman G, Schmidt H. The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Acad Med 1992; 67: 557–565
  • Picciano A. Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. JALN 2009; 13: 7
  • Rao Z. Matching teaching styles with learning styles in East Asian contexts. Int TESL J 2001; 7: 1–9
  • Ronteltap F, Eurelings A. Activity and interaction of students in an electronic learning environment for problem-based learning. Dist Educ 2002; 23: 11–22
  • Salmon G. E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. Kogan Page, London 2000
  • Shamsan B, Syed A. Evaluation of problem based learning course at college of medicine, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. Int J Health Sci 2009; 3: 249–258
  • Sharpe R. Why blend? Rationales for blended e-learning in undergraduate education [Internet] Briefing Paper. The Higher Education Academy., York 2006, Available from: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/archive/blended_elearning_why_blend.pdf
  • Shehab SAJ. Undergraduate learners’ perceptions of blended learning and its relationship with some demographic and experiential variables at the Arab Open University – Bahrain branch. Arabian Gulf University., Education. Bahrain 2007, p. 160
  • Sutton L. The principle of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communications. Int J Educ Telecommun 2001; 7: 223–242
  • Taradi SK, Taradi M, Radic K, Pokrajac N. Blending problem-based learning with Web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid-base physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 2005; 29: 35–39
  • Taylor D, Miflin B. Problem-based learning: Where are we now?. Med Teach 2008; 30: 742–763
  • The Bellingham Public Schools. 1999. 7 essential skills for teamwork [Internet]. Bellingham (WA): The Bellingham Public Schools. Available from: http://bellinghamschools.org/sites/default/files/studentgal/onlineresearch/oldonline/mod8team.htm.
  • Voos R. Blended learning–What is it and where might it take us. Sloan-C View 2003; 2: 3–5
  • Vygotsky L. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1978
  • Walker S, Fraser B. Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: The Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES). Learn Environ Res 2005; 8: 289–308
  • Walton H. Small group methods in medical teaching. Med Educ 1997; 31: 459–464
  • Woltering V, Herrler A, Spitzer K, Spreckelsen C. Blended learning positively affects students’ satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: Results of a mixed-method evaluation. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009; 14: 725–738
  • Wood D. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Problem based learning. BMJ 2003; 326: 328–330
  • Wood D. Problem based learning: Time to stop arguing about the process and examine the outcomes. BMJ 2008; 336: 971–971

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.