The UK Clinical Aptitude Test: Is it a fair test for selecting medical students?

References

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. National Council on Measurement in Education, Washington, DC 1999
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Medical Colleges, Medical College Admission Test. About the MCAT exam. [Accessed 25 March 2011] Available from www.aamc.org/students/mcat/
   Google Scholar
• Australian Council for Educational Research. Information Booklet 2010, Graduate Medical School Admissions Test. [Accessed 5 March 2011] Available from www.gamsatuk.org
   Google Scholar
• Australian Council for Educational Research. Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT). [Accessed 4 March 2011] Available from http://umat.acer.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• Briggs D. Test preparation programs: Impact. The encyclopaedia of education., In 2002, 2nd ed. pp 2542–2545. [Accessed 12 February 2011] Available from http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/Briggs_TestPreparationPrograms.pdf. Posted with the permission of the publisher. Copyright 2002 by Thompson Learning Global Rights Group
   Google Scholar
• British Medical Association. 2009. Equality and diversity in UK medical schools. BMA. [Accessed 15 February 2011] Available from http://www.bma.org.uk/images/eocreport_tcm41-192128.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Browne J, 2010. Securing a sustainable future for higher education in England: An independent review of higher education funding & student finance. [Accessed 24 February 2011] Available from www.independent.gov.uk/browne-report
   Google Scholar
• Callahan C, Hojat M, Veloski J, Erdman J, Gonnella J. The predictive validity of three versions of the MCAT in relation to performance in medical school, residency and licensing examinations: A longitudinal study of 36 classes of Jefferson Medical College. Acad Med 2010; 85: 980–987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe R. It's the effect size stupid: What effect size is and why it is important. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Exeter, UK, 2002, 12–14 September 2002
   Google Scholar
• Ding S, Song K, Richardson L. Do mathematical gender differences continue? A longitudinal study of gender difference and excellence in mathematics performance in the U.S. Educ Stud 2007; 40(3)279–295
   Google Scholar
• Else-Quest N, Hyde J, Linn M. Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2010; 136(1)103–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• xGeneral Medical Council. 2009. Tomorrow's Doctors 2009. London: General Medical Council. [Accessed 9 April 2011] Available from www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/tomorrows_doctors.asp
   Google Scholar
• James D, Yates J, Nicholson S. Comparison of A level and UKCAT performance in students applying to UK medical and dental schools in 2006: Cohort study. BMJ 2010; 349: c478
   Google Scholar
• Kulik J, Kulik C, Bangert R. Effects of practice on aptitude and achievement test scores. Am Educ Res J 1984; 21(2)435–447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy P, Lemeshow S, Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications, 3rd edition 1999, Wiley-Interscience
   Google Scholar
• Lynch B, MacKenzie R, Dowell J, Cleland J, Prescott G. Does UKCAT predict Year 1 performance in medical school?. Med Educ 2009; 43: 103–1209
   Google Scholar
• Mathers J, Sitch A, Marsh JL, Parry J, 2011. Widening access to medical education for under-represented socioeconomic groups: Population based cross sectional analysis of UK data 2002-6. BMJ 341:d918
   Google Scholar
• McManus I, Wakeford R, Richards P. Intellectual aptitude tests and A levels for selecting UK school leaver entrants for medical school. BMJ 2005; 331: 555–559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus D. Socially desirable responding; The evolution of a construct. The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement, H Braun, D Jackson, D Wiley. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 2002
   Google Scholar
• Prideaux D, Roberts C. Assessment for selection for the health care professions and speciality training: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 conference. Med Teach 2011; 33: 215–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust J. Discussion piece: The psychometric principles of assessment. Res Matters 2007; 3: 25–27
   Google Scholar
• Sackett P, Borneman J, Connelly B. High stakes testing in higher education and employment: Appraising the evidence for validity and fairness. Am Psychol 2008; 63: 215–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz N, Oyserman D. Asking questions about behaviour: Cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction. Am J Educ 2001; 22: 127–160
   Google Scholar
• Sheard M. Hardiness commitment, gender, and age differentiate university academic performance. Br J Educ Psychol 2009; 79: 189–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supporting Professionalism in Admissions (SPA). 2010. Defining the applicant experience. [Accessed 4 March 2011] Available from www.spa.ac.uk/documents/applicant_experience/
   Google Scholar
• Turner R, Nicholson S. Can the UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) select suitable candidates for interview?. Med Educ 2011; 45(9)1041–1047
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• UK Clinical Aptitude Test Consortium, Candidate Survey 2009. 2010. [Accessed 14 March 2011] Available from http://www.ukcat.ac.uk/pdf/Executive%20summary%20for%20website.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UK Clinical Aptitude Test Consortium, 2008a. The UKCAT 2006 annual report. [Accessed 14 March 2011] Available from www.ukcat.ac.uk/pdf/Annaul%20Report%202008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UK Clinical Aptitude Test Consortium, 2008b. The UKCAT 2007 Annual Report. [Accessed 14 March 2011] Available from www.ukcat.ac.uk/pdf/Annaul%20Report%202007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UK Clinical Aptitude Test Consortium. Annual report. United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test., Cambridge 2008, [Accessed 14 March 2011] Available from http://www.ukcat.ac.uk/pdf/Annaul%20Report%202008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UK Clinical Aptitude Test Consortium, Technical Report United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test Consortium. Testing interval: 6 July 2010–8 October 2010. Executive Summary. Pearson Vue Chicago. [Accessed 14 March 2011] Available from http://www.ukcat.ac.uk/pdf/UKCAT%202010%20Technical%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UK Clinical Aptitude Test Homepage, Preparing for the test, overview. [Accessed 14 March 2011] Available from www.ukcat.ac.uk/pages/details.aspx?page=preparationOverview
   Google Scholar
• Universities and Colleges Admission Service. 2010. Individual institution and all institutions level Management Statistics, Corporate Data, Policy and Research, UCAS. [Accessed 11 March 2011] Available from http://www.ucas.ac.uk/about_us/stat_services/stats_online/annual_datasets_to_download
   Google Scholar
• Wright S, Bradley P. Has the UK Clinical Aptitude Test improved medical student selection?. Med Educ 2010; 44: 1069–1076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates J, James D, 2010. The value of the UK Clinical Aptitude Test in predicting pre-clinical performance: A prospective cohort study at Nottingham Medical School. BMC Med Educ 10:55. [Accessed 1 February 2011] Available from www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/10/25
   Google Scholar