Simulation in healthcare: A taxonomy and a conceptual framework for instructional design and media selection

References

• Alinier G. A typology of educationally focused medical simulation tools. Med Teach 2007; 29: e243–e250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelman R. Designing experiential modes: A key focus for immersive learning environments. TechTrends 2004; 49: 64–74
   Google Scholar
• Barrows HS. An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. Acad Med 1993; 68: 443–451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaubien JM, Baker DP. The use of simulation for training teamwork skills in health care: How low can you go?. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13(Suppl 1)i51–i56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard T, Stevens A, Wagner P, Bernard N, Oxendine C, Johnsen K, Dickerson R, Raji A, Lok B, Duerson M, et al. A multi-institutional pilot study to evaluate the use of virtual patients to teach health professions students history-taking and communication skills. Simul Healthc 2006; 1: 92
   Google Scholar
• Bokken L, Rethans JJ, Scherpbier AJ, van der VlC. Strengths and weaknesses of simulated and real patients in the teaching of skills to medical students: A review. Simul Healthc 2008; 3: 161–169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buljac-Samardzic M, Dekker-van Doorn CM, van Wijngaarden JD, van Wijk KP. Interventions to improve team effectiveness: A systematic review. Health Policy 2010; 94: 183–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell DJ, Lee C. Self-appraisal in performance evaluation: Development versus evaluation. Acad Manage Rev 1988; 13: 302–314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase J, Houmanfar R. The differential effects of elaborate feedback and basic feedback on student performance in a modified, personalized system of instruction course. J Behav Educ 2009; 18: 245–265
   Google Scholar
• Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: Sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med 2002; 77: S86–S93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIHC Competencies Working Group. A national interprofessional competency framework. Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative, VancouverCanada 2010
   Google Scholar
• Clark RE. Dangers in the evaluation of instructional media. Acad Med 1992; 67: 819–820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Abe K, Rethans JJ. The use of simulated patients in medical education: AMEE Guide No 42. Med Teach 2009; 31: 477–486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins JP, Harden RM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 13: Real patients, simulated patients and simulators in clinical examinations. Med Teach 1998; 20: 508–521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA. The research we still are not doing: An agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Acad Med 2005; 80: 541–548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2010; 85: 1589–1602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin PJ, Hamstra SJ. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011; 306: 978–988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Triola MM. Virtual patients: A critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med Educ 2009; 43: 303–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review. JAMA 2006; 296: 1094–1102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieckmann P, Gaba D, Rall M. Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simul Healthc 2007; 2: 183–193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dreifuerst KT. The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: A concept analysis. Nurs Educ Perspect 2009; 30: 109–114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Early PC, Northcraft GB, Lee C, Lituchy T. Impact of process and outcome feedback on the relation of goal setting to task performance. Acad Manage J 1990; 33: 87–105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edinger W, Robertson J, Skeel J, Schoonmaker J. Using standardized patients to teach clinical ethics. Med Educ Online 1999; 4: 1–5
   Google Scholar
• Ellaway R, Evans P, McKillop J, Cameron H, Morrison J, McKenzie H, Mires G, Pippard M, Simpson J, Cumming A, et al. Cross-referencing the Scottish Doctor and Tomorrow's Doctors learning outcome frameworks. Med Teach 2007; 29: 630–635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 1995; 37: 32–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004; 79: S70–S81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2005; 39: 98–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov N. Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innov Educ Train Int 1995; 32: 175–187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc 2007; 2: 115–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P, Glavin R, Maran N, Patey R. Rating non-technical skills: Developing a behavioural marker system for use in anaesthesia. Cogn Tech Work 2004; 6: 165–171
   Google Scholar
• Frank JR, ed. 2005. The CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. Ottawa, Canada: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Frank JR, Brien S. The Safety Competencies Steering Committee. The safety competencies: Enhancing patient safety across the health professions. Canadian Patient Safety Institute, OttawaCanada 2008
   Google Scholar
• Friedman CP. The research we should be doing. Acad Med 1994; 69: 455–457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman CP. Anatomy of the clinical simulation. Acad Med 1995; 70: 205–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in healthcare. Simul Healthc 2007; 2: 126–135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaba DM, Howard SK, Fish KJ, Smith BE, Sowb YA. Simulation-based training in anesthesia crisis resource management (ACRM): A decase of experience. Simul Gaming 2001; 32: 175–193
   Google Scholar
• Gagné RM, Medsker KL. The conditions of learning: Training applications. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Gagné RM, Wager WW, Golas KC, Keller JM. Principles of instructional design5th. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA 2005
   Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors: Outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. GMC, London 2009
   Google Scholar
• Gorman PJ, Meier AH, Krummel TM. Simulation and virtual reality in surgical education: Real or unreal?. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 1203–1208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross DC. Report from the Fidelity Implementation Study Group. Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, Orlando, FL 1999
   Google Scholar
• Harden RM. Outcome-based education – The ostrich, the peacock and the beaver. Med Teach 2007; 29: 666–671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan Z-U, Sloan P. Using a mannequin-based simulator for anesthesia resident training in cardiac anesthesia. Simul Healthc 2006; 1: 44–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hewson MG, Little ML. Giving feedback in medical education: Verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13: 111–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huwendiek S, De leng BA, Zary N, Fischer MR, Ruiz JG, Ellaway R. Towards a typology of virtual patients. Med Teach 2009; 31: 743–748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen DR, Fisher CD, Taylor MS. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. J Appl Psychol 1979; 64: 349–371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005; 27: 10–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby J, Mazursky D, Troutman T, Kuss A. When feedback is ignored: Disutility of outcome feedback. J Appl Psychol 1984; 69: 531–545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DS, Perlow R, Pieper KF. Differences in task performance as a function of type of feedback: Learning-oriented versus performance-oriented feedback. J Appl Social Psychol 1993; 23: 303–320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann C, Liu A. Trauma training: Virtual reality applications. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001; 81: 236–241
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keane DR, Norman GR, Vickers J. The inadequacy of recent research on computer-assisted instruction. Acad Med 1991; 66: 444–448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern DE, Thomas PA, Hughes MT, eds. 2009. Curriculum development for medical education: A six-step approach, 2nd. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kneebone R, Kidd J, Nestel D, Asvall S, Paraskeva P, Darzi A. An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. Med Educ 2002; 36: 628–634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi L, Suner S, Shapiro MJ, Jay G, Sullivan F, Overly F, Seekell C, Hill A, Williams KA, EMT-P NR. Multipatient disaster scenario design using mixed modality medical simulation for the evaluation of civilian prehospital medical response: A “dirty bomb” case study. Simul Healthc 2006; 1: 72–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kolb DA. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1984
   Google Scholar
• Lampotang S. Virtual anesthesia machine has worldwide impact. APSF Newslett 2003; 18: 57
   Google Scholar
• Lareau SA, Kyzer BD, Hawkins SC, McGinnis HD. Advanced wilderness life support education using high-technology patient simulation. Wilderness Environ Med 2010; 21: 166–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SK, Pardo M, Gaba D, Sowb Y, Dicker R, Straus EM, Khaw L, Morabito D, Krummel TM, Knudson MM. Trauma assessment training with a patient simulator: A prospective, randomized study. J Trauma 2003; 55: 651–657
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeFlore JL, Anderson M. Alternative educational models for interdisciplinary student teams. Simul Healthc 2009; 4: 135–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Saari LM, Shaw KN, Latham GP. Goal setting and performance: 1969–1980. Psychol Bull 1981; 90: 125–152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maran NJ, Glavin RJ. Low- to high-fidelity simulation – A continuum of medical education?. Med Educ 2003; 37: 22–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire CH. Simulation: Its essential nature and characteristics. Innovative simulations for assessing professional competence: From paper-and-pencil to virtual reality, A Tekian, CH McGuire, WC McGaghie. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago 1999; 3–6
   Google Scholar
• Monti EJ, Wren K, Haas R, Lupien AE. The use of an anesthesia simulator in graduate and undergraduate education. CRNA 1998; 9: 59–66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moorthy K, Smith S, Brown T, Bann S, Darzi A. Evaluation of virtual reality bronchoscopy as a learning and assessment tool. Respiration 2003; 70: 195–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris J. Peer assessment: A missing link between teaching and learning? A review of the literature. Nurse Educ Today 2001; 21: 507–515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G. Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends. Med Educ 2005; 39: 418–427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick J, James N. A task-oriented perspective of situation awareness. A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory and application, SP Banbury, S Tremblay. Ashgate Publishing, HampshireEngland 2004; 61–81
   Google Scholar
• Phillips J, Berge ZL. Second life for dental education. J Dent Educ 2009; 73: 1260–1264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raemer DB. Team-oriented medical simulation. Simulators in critical care education and beyond, WF Dunn. Society of Critical Care Medicine, Des Plaines, IL 2004; 42–46
   Google Scholar
• Reader T, Flin R, Lauche K, Cuthbertson BH. Non-technical skills in the intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96: 551–559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehmann AJ, Mitman RD, Reynolds MC. A handbook of flight simulation fidelity requirements for human factors research. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Atlantic City, NJ 1995
   Google Scholar
• Reiser RA, Gagné RM. Selecting media for instruction. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1983
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There's no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc 2006; 1: 49–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salas E, Bowers CA, Rhodenizer L. It is not how much you have but how you use it: Toward a rational use of simulation to support aviation training. Int J Aviat Psychol 1998; 8: 197–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas E, Burke CS. Simulation for training is effective when…. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11: 119–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas E, Klein C, King H, Salisbury M, Augenstein JS, Birnbach DJ, Robinson DW, Upshaw C. Debriefing medical teams: 12 Evidence-based best practices and tips. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008; 34: 518–527
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salas E, Wilson KA, Burke CS, Priest HA. Using simulation-based training to improve patient safety: What does it take?. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005; 31: 363–371
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schär SG, Schluep S, Schierz C, Krueger H. Interaction for computer-aided learning. Interact Multimedia Electr J Comput-Enhanced Learn 2000; 2, [Accessed 1 February 2012] Available from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2000/1/03/
   Google Scholar
• Schiavenato M. Reevaluating simulation in nursing education: Beyond the human patient simulator. J Nurs Educ 2009; 48: 388–394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuwirth L. Can clinical reasoning be taught or can it only be learned?. Med Educ 2002; 36: 695–696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JR, Cole FS. Patient safety: Effective interdisciplinary teamwork through simulation and debriefing in the neonatal ICU. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2009; 21: 163–179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swing SR. The ACGME outcome project: Retrospective and prospective. Med Teach 2007; 29: 648–654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triola M, Feldman H, Kalet AL, Zabar S, Kachur EK, Gillespie C, Anderson M, Griesser C, Lipkin M. A randomized trial of teaching clinical skills using virtual and live standardized patients. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: 424–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai T-C, Harasym PH, Nijssen-Jordan C, Jennett P. Learning gains derived from a high-fidelity mannequin-based simulation in the pediatric emergency department. J Formos Med Assoc 2006; 105: 94–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukanovic-Criley JM, Boker JR, Criley SR, Rajagopalan S, Criley JM. Using virtual patients to improve cardiac examination competency in medical students. Clin Cardiol 2008; 31: 334–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallin CJ, Meurling L, Hedman L, Hedegard J, Fellander-Tsai L. Target-focused medical emergency team training using a human patient simulator: Effects on behaviour and attitude. Med Educ 2007; 41: 173–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayne DB, Didwania A, Feinglass J, Fudala MJ, Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC. Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses at an academic teaching hospital: A case-control study. Chest 2008; 133: 56–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams V. Designing simulations for learning. E-J Instruct Sci Technol 2003; 6, [Accessed 11 November 2011] Available from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/e-jist/docs/Vol6_No1/contents2.htm
   Google Scholar
• Youngblood P, Harter PM, Srivastava S, Moffett S, Heinrichs WL, Dev P. Design, development, and evaluation of an online virtual emergency department for training trauma teams. Simul Healthc 2008; 3: 146–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngblood P, Heinrichs L, Cornelius C, Dev P. Designing case-based learning for virtual worlds. Simul Healthc 2007; 2: 246–247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar