References
- Andrich D. Controversy and the Rasch model: A characteristic of incompatible paradigm?. Med Care 2004; 42(1 Suppl)I7–16
- Bhakta B, Tennant A, Horton M, Lawton G, Andich D. Using item response theory to explore the psychometric propertoes of extended matching questions examination in undergraduate medical education. BMC Med Educ 2005; 5(9)1–13
- Bond T, Fox C. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, London 2007
- Chang KY, Tsou MY, Chan KH, Chang SH, Tai JJ, Chen HH. Item analysis for the written test of Taiwanese board certification examination in anaesthesiology using the Rasch model. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 717–722
- Cohen R, Sweedlik M. Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Burr Ridge, IL 2010
- de Champlain A. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education. Med Educ 2010; 44: 109–117
- de Champlain AF, Melnick D, Scoles P, Subhiyah R, Holtzman K, Swanson D, Angelucci K, McGrenra C, Fournier JP, Benchimol D, et al. Assessing medical students' clinical sciences knowledge in France: A collaboration between the NBME and a consortium of French medical schools. Acad Med 2003; 78: 509–517
- Downing S. Item response theory: Applications of modern test theory in medical education. Med Educ 2003; 37: 739–743
- Hambleton R, Jones R. Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educ Meas Issues Pract 1993; 12: 38–47
- Houston J. Judges' perception of candidates' organization and communication in relation to oral certification examination ratings. Acad Med 2009; 84: 1603–1609
- Iramaneerat C, Yudkowsky R, Myford CM, Downing SM. Quality control of an OSCE using generalizability theory and many-faceted Rasch measurement. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008; 13: 479–493
- Linacre J. Detecting multidimensionality: Which residual data-type works best?. J Outcome Meas 1998; 2: 266–283
- Linacre J. What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean?. Rasch Meas Trans 2002; 16: 878
- Linacre J. A user's guide to winsteps. MESA Press, Chicago 2011
- McManus IC, Thompson M, Mollon J. Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency (‘hawk-dove effect’) in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling. BMC Med Educ 2006; 6(42)1–22
- Nunnally JC, Bernstein I. Psychometroic theory. Mcgraw-Hill, New York, NY 1994
- Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1980
- Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach' alpha. Int J Med Educ 2011a; 2: 53–55
- Tavakol M, Dennick R. Post examination analysis of objective tests. Med Teach 2011b; 33: 447–458
- Tavakol M, Dennick R. Post-examination interpretion of objective test data: Monitoring and improving the quality of high-stakes examinations – A commentary on two AMEE Guides. Med Teach 2012a; 34(3)245–248
- Tavakol M, Dennick R. Post-examination interpretion of objective test data: Monitoring and improving the quality of high-stakes examinations: AMEE Guide No 66. Med Teach 2012b; 34: e161–e175
- Wright B, Masters G. Rating scale analysis. MESA Press, Chicago 1982
- Wright B, Stone MH. Best test design. MESA Press, Chicago 1979
- Yang SC, Tsou MY, Chen ET, Chan KH, Chang KY. Statistical item analysis of the examination in anesthesiology for medical students using the Rasch. J Chin Med Assoc 2011; 74: 125–129