Writing for academia: Getting your research into print: AMEE Guide No. 74

References

• Boice R. Professors as writers. A self-help guide to productive writing. New Forums Press Inc, Stillwater, OK 1990
   Google Scholar
• Bordage G. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Acad Med 2001; 76(9)889–896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ 2010; 44(4)358–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coverdale J, Louie A, Roberts LW. Getting started in educational research. Acad Psychiatry 2005; 29: 14–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coverdale J, Roberts L, Louie A, Beresin E. Writing the methods. Acad Psychiatry 2006; 30(5)361–364
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crandall SJ, McGaghie WC. Discussion and conclusion: Interpretation. Acad Med 2001; 76: 942–944
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE. How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA 2006
   Google Scholar
• Gall MD, Gall JP, Borg WR. Educational research: An introduction. Longman, White Plains, NY 2003
   Google Scholar
• Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 2006; 295(1)90–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 2000a; 284(3)357–362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 2000b; 284(4)478–482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Brian Haynes R. Preparing reports for publication and responding to reviewers’ comments. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59(9)900–906
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haig A, Dozier M. BEME Guide No. 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education, part 2: Constructing searches. Med Teach 2003a; 25: 463–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haig A, Dozier M. BEME Guide No. 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education, Part I: Sources of information. Med Teach 2003b; 25: 352–363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammick M, Dornan T, Steinert Y. Conducting a best evidence systematic review. Part 1: From idea to data coding. BEME Guide No. 13. Med Teach 2010; 32(1)3–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart IR. Best evidence medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ: Theory and Pract 2000; 5(1)71–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart IR, Harden RM. Best evidence medical education (BEME): A plan for action. Med Teach 2000; 22(2)131–135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn C, Plazas Snyder B, Coverdale JH, Louie AK, Roberts LW. Educational research questions and study design. Acad Psychiatry 2009; 33(3)261–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoschl C, Fialova L, Moller H-J, Balon R. European Psychiatric Association guidance on the conflicts of interest. Eur Psychiatry 2012; 27(2)142–146, (author erratum, 2012, Eur Psychiatry 27:308)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2009. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Ethical considerations in the conduct and reporting of research: Authorship and contributorship. [Accessed 29 March 2012] Available from http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html
   Google Scholar
• Inui TS, Frankel RM. Evaluating the quality of qualitative research: A proposal pro tem. J Gen Intern Med 1991; 6(5)485–486
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Louie A, Coverdale J, Edenharder K, Roberts LW. Publishing a manuscript. Handbook of career development in academic psychiatry and behavioral sciences, LW Roberts, DM Hilty. American Psychiatric Publishing, Washington, DC 2006; 241–250
   Google Scholar
• Maggio LA, Tannery NH, Kanter SL. Reproducibility of literature search reporting in medical education reviews. Acad Med 2011; 86: 1040–1054
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGaghie WC. Scholarship, publication, and career advancement in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 43. AMEE Guide 2009; 31(7)574–590
   Google Scholar
• McGaghie WC, Bordage G, Crandall S, Pangara L. Method: Research design. Acad Med 2001; 76: 929–931
   Google Scholar
• McGaghie WC, Crandall S. Data analysis and statistics. Acad Med 2001; 76: 936–938
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D, (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001; 285(15)1987–1991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pangaro L, McGaghie WC. Relevance. Acad Med 2001; 76: 927–928
   Google Scholar
• Prideaux D. Researching the outcomes of educational interventions: A matter of design. RTCs have important limitations in evaluating educational interventions. Br Med J 2002; 324(7330)126–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provenzale JM. Revising a manuscript: Ten principles to guide success for publication. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195(6)W382–W387
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reed D, Price EG, Windish DM, Wright SM, Gozu A, Hsu EB, Beach MC, Kern D, Bass EB. Challenges in systematic reviews of educational intervention studies. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142(12 Pt 2)1080–1089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regehr G. Presentation of results. Acad Med 2001; 76: 940–942
   Google Scholar
• Ringsted C, Hodges B, Scherpbier A. The research compass: An introduction to research in medical education, AMEE Guide No. 56 ed. Association for Medical Education in Europe, DundeeScotland 2011
   Google Scholar
• Roberts LW, Coverdale J, Edenharder K, Louie A. How to review a manuscript: A “down to earth” approach. Acad Psychiatry 2004; 28: 81–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts LW, Geppert C, Connor R, Nguyen K, Warner TD. An invitation for medical educators to focus on ethical and policy issues in research and scholarly practice. Acad Med 2001; 76(9)876–885
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts LW, Geppert CM, Coverdale J, Louie A, Edenharder K. Ethical and regulatory considerations in educational research. Acad Psychiatry 2005; 29(1)1–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sackett DL, Wennberg JE. Choosing the best research design for each question. Br Med J 1997; 315(7123)1636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw D. The ICMJE's definition of authorship is illogical and unethical. Br Med J 2011; 343: d7192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan GM. A primer on the validity of assessment instruments. J Grad Med Educ 2011; 3: 119–120
   PubMedGoogle Scholar