Using databases in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 77

References

• Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association. Code of ethics, american educational research association and Australian council for educational research. Educ Res 2011; 40: 145–156
   Google Scholar
• Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2000
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press, Boston 1991
   Google Scholar
• Bowling A. Research methods in health. Open University Press, Buckingham 1997
   Google Scholar
• Brice J, Bligh J, Bordage G, Colliver J, Cook D, Eva KW, Harden R, Kanter SL, Norman GR. Publishing ethics in medical education journals. Acad Med 2009; 84: S132–S134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman A. The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology?. Brit J Sociol 1984; 35: 75–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll K, Iedema R, Kerridge R. Reshaping ICU ward round practices using video-reflexive ethnography. Qual Health Res 2008; 18: 380–390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Milne A, Sinclair HK, Lee AJ. Predicting performance cohort study: Is performance on early MBChB assessments predictive of later undergraduate grades?. Med Educ 2008a; 42: 676–683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Knight L, Rees C, Tracey S, Bond CB. ‘Is it me or is it them?’ Factors influencing assessors’ failure to report underperformance in medical students. Med Educ 2008b; 42: 800–809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook D. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis in medical education: What role do they play?. Med Teach 2012; 34: 468–447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin NR, Lincolm YS. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research4th. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2001
   Google Scholar
• Egan-Lee E, Frietag S, LeBlanc V, Baker L, Reeves S. Twelve tips for ethical approval for research in health professions education. Med Teach 2011; 33: 268–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikelboom JI, ten Cate OTJ, Jaarsma D, Raat JAN, Schuwirth L, van Delden JM. A framework for the ethics review of education research. Med Educ 2012; 46: 728–737
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eva K. Research ethics requirements for medical education. Med Educ 2009; 43: 194–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding N, Lee R. Using computers in qualitative research. Sage, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Firestone WA. Meaning in method: The rhetoric of quantitative and qualitative research. Educ Res 1987; 16: 16–21
   Google Scholar
• Gage NL. The paradigm wars and their aftermath. Educ Res 1989; 18: 4–10
   Google Scholar
• Guba EG. Towards a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. Centre for the Study of Evaluation, Los Angeles, CA 1978
   Google Scholar
• Kanter S. Ethical approval for studies involving human participants: Academic Medicine's new policy. Acad Med 2009; 84: 149–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions2nd. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1970
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan JC, McHarg J. Ethical permission for the publication of routinely collected data. Med Educ 2005; 39: 944–948
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Moffat M, Cleland J, van der Molen T, Price D. Poor communication may impair optimal asthma care: A qualitative study. Fam Pract 2007; 24: 65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison J, Prideaux D. Ethics approval for research in medical education. Med Educ 2001; 35: 1008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics – The bare essentials2nd. BC Decker, Hamilton 2000
   Google Scholar
• Patricio M, Vaz Carneiro A. Systematic reviews of evidence in medical education (BEME Reviews) and clinical medicine (Cochrane Reviews): Is the nature of evidence similar?. Med Teach 2012; 34: 474–482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie A, Sabin C. Medical statistics at a glance2nd. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA 2005
   Google Scholar
• Pugsley L, Dornan T. Using a sledgehammer to crack a nut: Clinical ethics review and medical education research projects. Med Educ 2007; 41: 726–728
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ringsted C, Hodges B, Scherpier A. AMEE Guide 56 research in medical education. ‘The research compass’: An introduction to research in medical education. AMEE. Med Teach 2011; 33: 695–709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan GW, Bernard HR. ‘Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods 2003; 15(1)85–109
   Google Scholar
• Silver C, Fielding N. Using computer packages in qualitative research. The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, C Willig, W Stainton-Rogers. Sage Publications, London 2008; 334–351
   Google Scholar
• Silver C, Patashnick P, 2011. ‘Finding fidelity: Advancing audiovisual analysis using software’. The KWALON Experiment: Discussions on Qualitative Data Analysis Software by Developers and Users, FQS, Vol 12, No 1. pp. 334–351
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques2nd. Sage, Newbury Park, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• ten Cate O. Why the ethics of medical education differ from those of medical research. Med Educ 2009; 43: 608–610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todres M, Tsimtsiou Z, Sidhu K, Stephenson A, Jones R. Medical students’ perceptions of the factors influencing their academic performance: An exploratory interview study with high-achieving and re-sitting medical students. Med Teach 2012; 34: e325–e331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar