A United Kingdom national survey of trends in ectopic pregnancy management

References

• Aggarwal R, Tully A, Grantcharov T, Larsen CR, Miskry T, Farthing A, et al. 2006. Virtual reality simulation training can improve technical skills during laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 113:1382–1387.
   Google Scholar
• Aziza M, Phadnis S, Irvine LM. 2006. Surgical management of ectopic pregnancy in a district general hospital. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 26:656–662.
   Google Scholar
• Bharanthan R, Merritt S, Ahmed H. 2012. Laparoscopic tubal surgery for ectopic pregnancy: trainees’ perspective in the UK. Gynecological Surgery 9:223–229.
   Google Scholar
• Creanga AA, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Bish CL, Zane S, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM. 2011. Trends in ectopic pregnancy mortality in the United States: 1980–2007. Obstetrics and Gynecology 117:837–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson EJ, Nicholson SC. 2002. Management of ectopic pregnancy in a Scottish teaching hospital: implications for training. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 22:197–200.
   Google Scholar
• Gray DT, Thorburn J, Lundorff P, Strandell A, Lindblom B. 1995. A cost- effectiveness study of a randomised trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 345:1139–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover KW, Tao G, Kent CK. 2010. Trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology 115:495–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, Dalsgaard T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, et al. 2009. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition) 338:b1802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis G, Drife J, editors. 2001. Why Mothers Die 1997–1999. The fifth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. London: RCOG Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundorff P, Thorburn J, Hahlin M, Kallfelt B, Lindblom B. 1991. Laparoscopic surgery in ectopic pregnancy. A randomized trial versus laparotomy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 70:343–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundorff P, Thorburn J, Lindblom B. 1992. Fertility outcome after conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy evaluated in a randomized trial. Fertility and Sterility 57:998–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy AA, Nager CW, Wujek JJ, Kettel LM, Torp VA, Chin HG. 1992. Operative laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective trial. Fertility and Sterility 57: 1180–1185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE. 2012. Pain and bleeding in early pregnancy: assessment and initial management of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage in the first trimester. NICE guideline; Draft for consultation, June.
   Google Scholar
• Odejinmi F, Madhuvrata P, Naftalin A, Boulton J, Chenoy R, Raveendran M. 2003. Enthusiasm and teamwork – the basis for increase in laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy: an Inner London district hospital experience. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 23:645–647.
   Google Scholar
• Odejinmi F, Sangrithi M, Olowu O. 2011. Operative laparoscopy as the mainstay method in management of hemodynamically unstable patients with ectopic pregnancy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 18:179–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odejinmi FO, Rizzuto MI, Macrae RE, Thakur V. 2008. Changing trends in the laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancy in a London district general hospital: 7-years experience. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 28:614–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poddar A, Tyagi J, Hawkins E, Opemuyi I. 2011. Standards of care provided by early pregnancy assessment units (EPAU): a UK-wide survey. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 31:640–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCOG. 2004. Guideline number 21: The management of tubal pregnancy. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; RCOG Press.
   Google Scholar
• RCOG. 2008. Report of a Working Party: Standards for gynaecology. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; RCOG Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subair O, Omojole F, Mistry N, Morgan H. 2004. Trainees and the management of ectopic pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 24:811–812.
   Google Scholar
• Takacs P, Latchaw G, Gaitan L, Chakhtoura N, De Santis T. 2005. Risk factors for conversion to laparotomy during laparoscopic management of an ectopic pregnancy. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2273:32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Takeda A, Manabe S, Mitsui T, Nakamura H. 2006. Management of patients with ectopic pregnancy with massive hemoperitoneum by laparoscopic surgery with intraoperative autologous blood transfusion. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 13:43–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toozs-Hobson P, Bidmead J, Khalid A, Cardozo L, Hill S. 2000. Current trends in management of ectopic pregnancy in the United Kingdom. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 20:74–77.
   Google Scholar
• Vaissade L, Gerbaud L, Pouly JL, Job-Spira N, Bouyer J, Coste J, et al. 2003. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic surgery versus methotrexate: comparison of data recorded in an ectopic pregnancy registry]. Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 32:447–458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vermesh M, Silva PD, Rosen GF, Stein AL, Fossum GT, Sauer MV. 1989. Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 73(3 Pt 1):400–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar