Diagnostic performance of p16 staining in atypical squamous cells ‘cannot exclude high-grade squamous epithelial lesion’ in predicting high-grade cervical pathology

References

• Agoff N, Lin P, Morihara J, Mao C, Kiviat NB, Koutsky LA. 2003. p16(INK4a) expression correlates with degree of cervical neoplasia: a comparison with Ki-67 expression and detection of high risk HPV types. Modern Pathology 16:665–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay S, Austin RM, Dabbs D, Zhao C. 2008. Adjunctive human papillomavirus DNA testing is a useful option in some clinical settings for disease risk assessment and triage of females with ASC-H Papanicolaou test results. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 132: 1874–1881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benevolo M, Vocaturo A, Mottolese M, Mariani L, Vocaturo G, Marandino F et al. 2008. Clinical role of p16INK4a expression in liquid-based cervical cytology: correlation with HPV testing and histologic diagnosis. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 129:606–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S, Evans H, Lantzy L, Scharre K, Youssef E. 2005. p16(INK4a) is a surrogate biomarker for a subset of human papilloma virus-associated dysplasias of the uterine cervix as determined on the Pap smear. Diagnostic Cytopathology 32:21–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun SW, Lee A, Kim S, Choi YJ, Lee YS, Park JS. 2013. Immunostaining of p16(INK4a)/Ki-67 and L1 capsid protein on liquid-based cytology specimens obtained from ASC-H and LSIL-H cases. International Journal of Medical Sciences 10:1602–1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey DD, Neal MH, Wilbur DC, Colgan TJ, Styer PE, Mody DR. 2004. Bethesda 2001 implementation and reporting rates: 2003 practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 128:1224–1229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton KJ, Bergeron C, Klement P, Trunk MJ, Keller T, Ridder R et al. 2010. The sensitivity and specificity of p16(INK4a) cytology vs HPV testing for detecting high-grade cervical disease in the triage of ASC-US and LSIL pap cytology results. European CINtec Cytology Study Group. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 134:12–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan LD, Jacob SV. 2005. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: the practice experience of a hospital-based reference laboratory with this new Bethesda System diagnostic category. Diagnostic Cytopathology 32:243–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans MF, Adamson CS, Papillo JL, St John TL, Leiman G, Cooper K. 2006. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes. Cancer 106:1054–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M, Hu L, Baliga M, He Z, Hughson MD. 2004. The predictive value of p16INK4a and hybrid capture 2 human papillomavirus testing for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 122:894–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaes R, Benner A, Friedrich T, Ridder R, Herrington S, Jenkins D et al. 2002. p16INK4a immunohistochemistry improves interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. American Journal of Surgical Pathology 26:1389–1399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotov P, Parameswaran L, Parisi JA et al. 2005. Application of p16INK4a immunostaining for definitive interpretation of ASC-H in liquid based cervical cytology smears with SurePath [abstract]. Modern Pathology 18:69A.
   Google Scholar
• Liu H, Shi J, Wilkerson M, Huang Y, Meschter S, Dupree W et al. 2007. Immunohistochemical detection of p16INK4a in liquid-based cytology specimens on cell block sections. Cancer 111:74–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louro AP, Roberson J, Eltoum I, Chhieng DC. 2003. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: A follow-up study of conventional and liquid-based preparations in a high-risk population. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 120:392–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtar GA, Delatour NL, Assiri AH, Gilliatt MA, Senterman M, Islam S. 2008. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: Cytohistologic correlation study with diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytologica 52:169–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negri G, Egarter-Vigl E, Kasal A, Romano F, Haitel A, Milan C. 2003. p16INK4a is a useful marker for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the cervix uteri and its precursors: an immunohistochemical study with immunocytochemical correlations. American Journal of Surgical Pathology 27:187–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negri G, Moretto G, Menia E, Vittadello F, Kasal A, Milan C et al. 2006. Immunocytochemistry of p16INK4a in liquid based cervicovaginal specimens with modified Papanicolaou counterstaining. Journal of Clinical Pathology 59:827–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieh S, Chen SF, Chu TY, Lai HC, Fu E. 2003. Expression of p16INK4a in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance from the uterine cervix. Gynecologic Oncology 91:201–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieh S, Chen SF, Chu TY, Lai HC, Lin YS, Fu E et al. 2005. Is p16INK4a expression more useful that human papillomavirus test to determine the outcome of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-categorized Pap smears?A comparative analysis using abnormal cervical smears with follow-up biopsies. Gynecologic Oncology 97:35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Patton AL, Duncan L, Bloom L, Phaneuf G, Zafar N. 2008. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and its clinical significance in postmenopausal, pregnant, postpartum, and contraceptive-use patients. Cancer 114:481–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samarawardana P, Dehn DL, Singh M, Franquemont D, Thompson C, Gaido L et al. 2010. p16(INK4a) is superior to high-risk human papillomavirus testing in cervical cytology for the prediction of underlying high-grade dysplasia. Cancer Cytopathology 118:146–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvaggi SM. 2013. Clinical significance of atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with histologic correlation: a 9-year experience. Diagnostic Cytopathology 41:943–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman ME, Castle PE, Solomon D. 2006. Cervical cytology of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): Characteristics and histologic outcomes. Cancer 108: 298–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung CO, Kim SR, Oh YL, Song SY. 2010. The use of p16(INK4A) immunocytochemistry in ‘Atypical squamous cells which cannot exclude HSIL’ compared with ‘Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance’ in liquid-based cervical smears. Diagnostic Cytopathology 38:168–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tringler B, Gup C, Singh M, Groshong S, Shroyer AL, Heinz DE et al. 2004. Evaluation of p16INK4a and pRb expression in cervical squamous and glandular neoplasia. Human Pathology 35:659–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoumpou I, Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Wentzensen N, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P et al. 2009. p16(INK4a) immunostaining in cytological and histological specimens from the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treatment Reviews 35:210–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. 2002. ASCCP-sponsored consensus conference. 2001 consensus guidelines or the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. Journal of the American Medical Association 287:2120–2129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, Spitzer M, Wilkinson EJ, Solomon D. 2006. ASCCP Sponsored Consensus Conference 2007. 2006 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical screening tests. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease 11:201–222.
   Google Scholar
• Wu HH, Allen SL, Kirkpatrick JL, Elsheikh TM. 2006. Reflex high-risk human papilloma virus DNA test is useful in the triage of women with atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Diagnostic Cytopathology 34:707–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar