Termination for fetal anomaly: Are women in England given a choice of method?

References

• Bartlett LA, Berg CJ, Shulman HB, Zane SB, Green CA, Whitehead S et al. 2004. Risk factors for induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology 103:729–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernick BA, Ufberg DD, Nemiroff R, Donnenfeld A, Tolosa JE. 1998. Success rate of cytogenetic analysis at the time of second-trimester dilation and evacuation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 179:957–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd PA, DeVigan C, Khoshnood B, Loane M, Garne E, Dolle H. 2008. Survey of prenatal screening policies in Europe for structural malformations and chromosome anomalies, and their impact on detection and termination rates for neural tube defects and Down's syndrome. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115:689–696.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd PA, Tondi F, Hicks NR, Chamberlain PF. 2004. Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 328:137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant AG, Grimes DA, Garrett JM, Stuart GS. 2011. Second-trimester abortion for fetal anomalies or fetal death: labor induction compared with dilation and evacuation. Obstetrics and Gynecology 117:788–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoine GA, Van Kirk SD, Romm J, Edelman AB, Jacobson SL, Jensen JT. 2005. Comparison of perinatal grief after dilation and evacuation or labor induction in second trimester terminations for fetal anomalies. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192:1928–1932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cates W Jr, Grimes DA. 1981. Deaths from second trimester abortion by dilatation and evacuation: causes, prevention, facilities. Obstetrics and Gynecology 58:401–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasen ST, Kalish RB, Gupta M, Kaufman J, Chervenak, FM. 2005. Obstetric outcomes after surgical abortion at > or = 20 weeks’ gestation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 193(3 Pt 2):1161–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitty LS, Hill M, White H, Wright D, Morris S. 2012. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy – ready for prime time? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 206:269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DH Department of Health. Abortion Statistics for England and Wales 2013. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/statistics-on-abortions-carried-out-in-england-and-wales-in-2013 (Accessed 12 June 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ernst LM, Gawron L, Fritsch MK. 2013. Pathologic examination of fetal and placental tissue obtained by dilation and evacuation. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 137:326–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawron LM, Hammond C, Ernst LM. 2013. Perinatal pathologic examination of non-intact, second-trimester fetal demise specimens: the value of standardization. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 137:1083–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson JE, Grobman WA, Haney E, Casele H. 2007. Mid-trimester dilation and evacuation with laminaria does not increase the risk for severe subsequent pregnancy complications. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 96:12–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalish RB, Chasen ST, Rosenzweig LB, Rashbaum WK, Chervenak FA. 2002. Impact of midtrimester dilation and evacuation on subsequent pregnancy outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 187:882–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly T, Suddes J, Howel D, Hewison J, Robson S. 2010. Comparing medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy at 13–20 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 117:1512–1520.
   Google Scholar
• Kerns J, Vanjani R, Freedman L, Meckstroth K, Drey EA, Steinauer J. 2012. Women's decision making regarding choice of second trimester termination method for pregnancy complications. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 116:244–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korenromp MJ, Christiaens GC, van den Bout J, Mulder EJ, Hunfeld JA, Bilardo CM et al. 2005. Long-term psychological consequences of pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality: a cross-sectional study. Prenatal Diagnosis 25:253–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr PA, Hayes JL, Gemzell-Danielsson K. 2008. Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(1):CD006714.
   Google Scholar
• Lyus R, Robson S, Parsons J, Fisher J, Cameron M. 2013. Second trimester abortion for fetal abnormality. British Medical Journal 347:f4165.
   Google Scholar
• National Health Service. Fetal anomaly screening programme. Screening for Down's syndrome: United Kingdom National Screening Committee Policy recommendations 2011–2014. Model of Best Practice. Available at: http://fetalanomaly.screening.nhs.uk/standardsandpolicies (Accessed 6 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaides K. 2011. A model for a new pyramid of prenatal care based on the 11 to 13 weeks assessment. Prenatal Diagnosis 31:3–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCOG. 2010. Termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality in England, Scotland and Wales. Report of a Working Party. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
   Google Scholar
• RCOG. 2011. The care of women requesting induced abortion. Guideline number 7. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
   Google Scholar
• Savage W, Francome C. 2011. British gynaecologists’ attitudes in 2008 to the provision of legal abortion. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 31:322–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman LP, Ling FW, Meyers CM, Shanklin DR, Simpson JL, Elias S. 1990. Dilation and evacuation for second-trimester genetic pregnancy termination. Obstetrics and Gynecology 75:1037–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statham H, Solomou W, Green J. 2001. When a baby has an abnormality: a study of parents’ experiences. University of Cambridge, Centre for Family Research; Mother and Infant Unit. (Unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Sun CC, Grumbach K, DeCosta DT, Meyers CM, Dungan JS. 1999. Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings in fetal anomalies. Pediatric and Developmental Pathology 2:131–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Paranjothy S, Templeton A. 2003. An audit of the management of induced abortion in England and Wales. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 83:327–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virk J, Zhang J, Olsen J. 2007. Medical abortion and the risk of subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine 357:648–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt C, Blaas HG, Salvesen KÅ, Eik-Nes SH. 2012. Comparison between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings in fetuses and infants with developmental anomalies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 39:666–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar