References
- Rumeau-Rouquette C., Du Mazaubrun C., Rabarison Y. Naiˇtre en France, 10 Ans d'Evolution. 1972–1981. INSERM-Doin, Paris 1984
- Bréart G., Poisson-Salonion A. S., Cabrol D., Maillard F., Chavigny C., Llado J. Evolution de la fréquence des cesariennes. Dans: Médecine Périnatale. XVBmes Journées Nationales, Nice. Arnette, Paris 1985
- Lebrun F., Amiel-Tison C., Sureau C. Securite de la naissance à terme et taux de césarienne. Arch. franc. Pediat. 1985; 42: 391–396
- Oakley A. Social consequences of obstetric technology: the importance of measuring ‘soft’ outcomes. Birth 1983; 10: 99–108
- Draft Report of the Task Force on Cesarean Childbirth. Consensus Development Conference on Cesarean Childbirth. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, N.I.H., Bethesda, MD 1980
- Donovan B. The Cesarean Birth Experience. Beacon Press, Boston, MA 1977
- Affonso D. D. Impact of Cesarean Childbirth. Davis, Philadelphia, PA 1981
- Affonso D. D. Missing pieces. A study of postpartum feelings. Birth Fam. J. 1977; 4: 159–164
- Affonso D. D., Stichler J. Exploratory study of women's reactions to having a cesarean birth. Birth Fam. J. 1978; 5: 88–94
- Enkin M. W. Having a section is having a baby. Birth Fam. J. 1977; 4: 99–103
- Lipson J. G., Tilden V. P. Psychological integration of the cesarean birth experience. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat. 1980; 50: 598–409
- Lipson J. G. Cesarean support groups: mutual help and education. Wom. Hlth 1982; 6: 27–39
- Cohen N. W. Minimizing emotional sequelae of cesarean childbirth. Birth 1977; 10: 114–119
- Erb L., Hill G., Houston D. A survey of parent's attitudes towards their cesarean births in Manitoba hospitals. Birth 1983; 10: 85–91
- Marut J. S., Mercer R. T. Comparison of primiparas' perception of vaginal and cesarean births. Nurs. Res. 1979; 28: 260–266
- Cranley M. S., Hedahl K. J., Pegg S. Women's perceptions of vaginal and cesarean deliveries. Nurs. Res. 1983; 32: 10–14
- Bradley C. F., Ross S. E., Warnyca J. A prospective study of mothers' attitudes and feelings following cesarean and vaginal births. Birth 1983; 10: 79–83
- MacClellan M. S., Cabianca W. Effects of early mother-infant contact following cesarean birth. Obstet. Gynec. 1980; 56: 52–55
- Field T. M., Widmayer S. M. Developmental follow-up of infants delivered by cesarean section and general anesthesia. Infant Behav. Dev. 1980; 3: 253–264
- Kendell R. E., Rennie D., Clarke J. A., Dean C. The social and obstetric correlates of psychiatric admission in the puerperium. Psychol. Med. 1981; I: 341–350
- Rodholm M. Effects of father-infant post-partum contact on their interaction 3 months after birth. Early hum. Dev. 1981; 5: 79–85
- Trowell J. Possible effects of caesarean section on the mothershild relationship. Early hum. Dev. 1982; 7: 41–51
- Morgan B. M., Aulakh J. M., Barker J. P., Reginald P. W., Goroszeniuk R., Trojanowski A. Anaesthetic morbidity following caesarean section under epidural or general anaesthesia. Lancet 1984; i: 328–330
- Cain R. L., Pedersen F. A., Zaslow M., Kramer E. Effects of the father's presence or absence during a cesarean delivery. Birth 1984; II: 10–15
- Crawford J. S. Experiences with extradural analgesia for caesarean section. Brit. J. Anaesth. 1980; 52: 821–825