Biocompatibility Analysis of Bioglass^® 45S5 and Biosilicate^® Implants in the Rabbit Eviscerated Socket

REFERENCES

• Migliori ME. Enucleation versus evisceration. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2002;13:298–302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perry JD, Lewis CD, Levine M. Evisceration after complete evaluation an acceptable option. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1227–8; author reply 1229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su GW, Yen MT. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;20:274–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkelaar Id Henkes, HE, Leersum Gk. Herman Snellen (1834–1908) and Müller’s ‘reform-auge’. A short history of the artificial eye. Doc Ophthalmol 1991;77:349–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perry AC. Integrated orbital implants. Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;8:75–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blaydon SM, Shepler TR, Neuhaus RW, et al. The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;19:364–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry JD, Goldberg RA, McCann JD, et al. Bovine hydroxyapatite orbital implant: a preliminary report. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;18:268–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodrigues AC, Schellini SA, Moraes-Silva MRB, Padovani CR. Fatores relacionados a extrusão do implante de cavidade. Rev Bras Oftalmol 1997;56:259–64.
   Google Scholar
• Brito MM. Análise da biocompatibilidade da esfera de quitosana porosa em cavidade eviscerada de coelho. Estudo comparativo com polietileno poroso [dissertation]. Botucatu: Universidade Estadual Paulista; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• França VP, Figueiredo AR, Vasconcelos AC, et al. [Experimental comparative study of bioactive composite with polymeric matrix for applications to oculoplastic surgery for tissue replacement]. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2005;68:425–431.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karesh JW. Biomaterials in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1998;9:66–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hench LL. The story of Bioglass. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006;17:967–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato MM, Blaydon SM, Scribbick FW Jr, et al. Use of bioglass for orbital volume augmentation in enophthalmos: a rabbit model (oryctolagus cuniculus). Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;19:455–465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenlee TK Jr, Beckham CA, Crebo AR, et al. Glass ceramic bone implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1972;6:235–244.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roriz VM. Avaliação clínica, histológica e morfométrica de alvéolos dentários de cães preenchidos com biovidro ou biossilicato, que posteriormente receberam implantes ossointegráveis [thesis]. Ribeirão Preto: Universidade de São Paulo; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Tirapelli C. Avaliação da eficácia de um biomaterial e conhecidos agentes dessensibilizantes no tratamento da hipersensibilidade dentinária – estudo in vitro e in vivo [thesis]. Ribeirão Preto: Universidade de São Paulo; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Massuda ET. Avaliação do biosilicato como prótese de orelha média [thesis]. Ribeirão Preto: Universidade de São Paulo; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Turrer CL, Figueiredo ARP, Oréfice RL, Maciel PE, et al. O uso de implantes de compósito bioativo de biocerâmica em matriz polimérica na reconstrução do complexo zigomático orbitário: novas perspectivas em biomateriais. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2008;71:153–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner PV, Baar M, Olfert ED. Laboratory animal medicine - needs and opportunities for Canadian veterinarians. Can Vet J 2009;50:257–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamada S, Ito T, Tamura T, et al. Age-related changes in serum/plasma biochemical parameters of WHHLMI rabbits. Exp Anim 2004;53:159–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL, Shoen FJ. (1994). Environmental and nutritional pathology. In: Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL, Shoen FJ, eds. Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 45–83.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson RL, Yen MT, Lucci LM, et al. The quasi-integrated porous polyethylene orbital implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;18:50–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraz LC, Schellini SA, Wludarski SL, et al. [Gel and porous polyethylene implants in the rabbit anophthalmic cavity]. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2006;69:305–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hench LL. Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 1991;74:1487–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hench LL, West JK. Biological applications of bioactive glasses. Life Chem Rep 1996;13:187–241.
   Google Scholar
• Peitl O, Zanotto ED, Hench LL. Highly bioactive P2O5 - CaO - Si O2 Glass ceramics. J Non-Crystalline Solids 2001;292:115–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar