453
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Inter-Rater and Test–Retest Reliability of the German Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-G)

, , , &
Pages 296-310 | Received 14 Jan 2014, Accepted 31 Aug 2014, Published online: 06 Nov 2014

REFERENCES

  • Anastasi A, Urbina S. (1997). Psychological testing. Prentice Hall.
  • Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. (2002). Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of health status measures. from http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/ assets/images/pdfs/xculture2002.pdf
  • Berg M, Fräslie KF, Hussain A. (2003a). Applicability of pediatric evaluation of disability inventory in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 10(3):118–126.
  • Berg M, Jahnsen R, Froslie KF, Hussain A. (2004). Reliability of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 24(3):61–77.
  • Berg M, Jahnsen R, Holm I, Hussain A. (2003b). Translation of a multi-disciplinary assessment - procedures to achieve functional equivalence. Advances in Physiotherapy 5(2):57–66.
  • Chen K-L, Hsieh C-L, Sheu C-F, Hu F-C, Tseng M-H. (2009). Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory in children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 41(4):273–278. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0319
  • Chen K-L, Tseng M-H, Hu F-C, Koh C-L. (2010). Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory: A cross-cultural comparison of daily function between Taiwanese and American children. Research in Developmental Disabilities 31(6):1590–1600. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.05.002
  • Cohen J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Retrieved from Your Journals@ database (70, 4). Psychological Bulletin October. Landis, R. K., Gary. (1977). The Measurement of observer Agreement for Categorical Data. International Biometrics Society 33(1):159–174.
  • Elad D, Barak S, Eisenstein E, Bar O, Herzberg O, Brezner. (2012). A. Reliability and validity of Hebrew Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) in children with cerebral palsy –health care professionals vs. mothers. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine 5(2):107–115.
  • Erkin G, Elhan A, Aybay C, Sirzai H, Ozel S. (2007). Validity and reliability of the Turkish translation of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Disability & Rehabilitation 29(16):1271–1279.
  • Feldman AB, Haley SM, Coryell J. (1990). Concurrent and construct validity of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Physical Therapy Journal 70(10):602–610.
  • Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. (2004). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley.
  • Fragala-Pinkham MA, Haley SM, Rabin J, Kharasch VS. (2005). A fitness program for children with disabilities. Physical Therapy 85(11):1182–1200.
  • Gannotti ME. (1998). The validity and reliability of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory for children living in Puerto Rico. (Ph.D.), University of Connecticut. Retrieved Available from EBSCOhost cin20 database.
  • Gannotti ME, Cruz C. (2001). Content and construct validity of a Spanish translation of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory for children living in Puerto Rico. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 20(4):7–24.
  • Gantschnig BE, Page J, Nilsson I, Fisher AG. (2013). Detecting differences in activities of daily living between children with and without mild disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy May/June 67(3):319–327.
  • Groleger K, Vidmar G, Zupan A. (2005). Applicability of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory in Slovenia. Journal of Child Neurology 20(5):411–416. doi: 10.1177/08830738050200050301
  • Haley SM, Coster WJ, Dumas HM, Moed R. (2012). PEDI-CAT: Development, standardization and administration manual. Trustees of Boston University, under license to CREcare, LLC.
  • Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow LH, Haltiwanger JT, Andrellos PJ. (1992). Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory: Development, standardization, and administration manual. Boston, MA: New England Medical Centre Inc. and PEDI Research Group.
  • Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. (2006). Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Physical Therapy 86(5):735–743.
  • Hambleton RK. (2001). The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 17(3):164–172.
  • Knox V, Usen Y. (2000). Clinical review of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 63(1):29–32.
  • Kottorp A, Bernspang B, Fisher AG. (2003). Validity of a performance assessment of activities of daily living for people with developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 47(Pt 8):597–605.
  • Iyer LV, Haley SM, Watkins MP, Dumas HM. (2003). Establishing minimal clinically important differences for scores on the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory for inpatient rehabilitation. Physical Therapy 83(10):888–898.
  • McCarthy ML, Silberstein CE, Atkins EA, Harryman SE, Sponseller PD, Hadley-Miller NA. (2002). Comparing reliability and validity of pediatric instruments for measuring health and well-being of children with spastic cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 44(7):468–476.
  • Mancini M. (2005). Inventory Pediatric Evaluation of Disability (PEDI): Brazilian adapted version of the manual. Belo Horizonte UFMG 6:55–133.
  • Merbitz C, Morris J, Grip JC. (1989). Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 70:308–312.
  • Morales N, Funayama C, Rangel V, Frontarolli A, Araujo R, Pinto R, Silva C. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) applied to children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 6(1):109.
  • Nichols, Case-Smith. (1996). Reliabilty and validity of the Peidatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association 8:15–24.
  • Nordmark E, Orban K, Hägglund G, Jarnlo GB. (1999). The American Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Applicability of PEDI in Sweden for children aged 2.0–6.9 years. Scandinavian Journal of Rehababilitation Medicine 31(2):95–100.
  • Nordtorp HL, Nyquist A, Jahnsen R, Moser T, Strand LI. (2013). Reliability of the Norwegian version of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC). Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 33(2):199–212. doi: doi:10.3109 /01942638.2012.739269.
  • Norman PHD, Streiner DL. (2008). Biostatistics: The bare essentials. B.C. Decker.
  • Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, Livingston M. (2008). Content validity of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 50(10):744–750.
  • Palisano RJ, Rosenbaum PL, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. (1997). Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 39:214–233.
  • Projektgruppe ergotherapeutische Befundinstrumente in der Pädiatrie, D. (Ed.). (2004). Befundinstrumente in der pädiatrischen Ergotherapie. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner Verlag.
  • Rich D, Rigby P, Wright V. (2013). Mothers’ experiences with the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 0(0), null. doi: doi:10.3109/01942638.2013.823473
  • Schulze C, Page J, Kottorp A, Lilja M. (2013). Adapting functional assessments for use in a new context: A balancing act. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 20(5):336–342. doi: doi:10.3109/11038128.2013.802010
  • Stahlhut M, Christensen J, Aadahl M. (2010). Applicability and intrarespondent reliability of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory in a random danish sample. Pediatric Physical Therapy 22(2):161–169 110.1097/PEP.1090b1013e3181dbf1965.
  • Stahlhut M, Gard G, Aadahl M, Christensen J. (2011). Discriminative validity of the danish version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 31(1):78–89. doi: doi:10.3109/01942638.2010.486824
  • Streiner DL, Norman GR. (2008). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press.
  • Vacha-Haase T. (1998). Reliability generalization: Exploring variance in measurement error affecting score reliability across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement 58(1):6–20. doi: 10.1177/0013164498058001002
  • Wassenberg-Severijnen JE. (2005). Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI): Calibrating the Dutch version. (PhD Doctoral thesis), Universiteit Utrecht.
  • Wright B, Linacre M. (1989). Observations are always ordinal; Measurement, however, must be interval. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 70:857–860.
  • Ziviani J, Ottenbacher KJ, Shepard K, Foreman S, Astbury W, Ireland P. (2001). Concurrent validity of the Functional Independence Measure for Children (Wee-FIM) and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory for children with developmental disabilities and acquired brain injury. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 21:91–101.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.