Towards a dosimetric framework for therapeutic ultrasound

References

• DUTy. Website of the EMRP Joint Research Project ‘Dosimetry for Ultrasound Therapy (DUTy)’ 2013. http://www.duty-project.eu (accessed 1 October 2014)
   Google Scholar
• ter Haar G, Shaw A, Pye S, Ward B, Bottomley F, Nolan R, et al. Guidance on reporting ultrasound exposure conditions for bio-effects studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011;37:177–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC 61689: Ultrasonics – Physiotherapy systems – Field specifications and methods of measurement in the frequency range 0.5 MHz to 5 MHz, version 3. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2013
   Google Scholar
• IEC 61157: Standard means for the reporting of the acoustic output of medical diagnostic ultrasonic equipment, version 2.1. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2013
   Google Scholar
• IEC 61161: Standard means for the reporting of the acoustic output of medical diagnostic ultrasonic equipment, version 2.1. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2013
   Google Scholar
• IEC 62127-1: Ultrasonics – Hydrophones – Part 1: Measurement and characterization of medical ultrasonic fields up to 40 MHz, version 1.1. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2013
   Google Scholar
• IEC 62359: Ultrasonics – Field characterization – Test methods for the determination of thermal and mechanical indices related to medical diagnostic ultrasound fields, version 2. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2010
   Google Scholar
• IEC 60601-2-37: Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-37: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of ultrasonic medical diagnostic and monitoring equipment, version 2. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2007
   Google Scholar
• IEC 62556: Ultrasonics – Field characterization – Specification and measurement of field parameters for high intensity therapeutic ultrasound (HITU) transducers and systems, version 1. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2014
   Google Scholar
• IEC 62555: Ultrasonics – Power measurement – Output power measurement for high intensity therapeutic ultrasound (HITU) transducers and systems’, version 1. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2013
   Google Scholar
• IEC 60601-2-62: Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-62: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of high intensity therapeutic ultrasound (HITU) equipment, version 1. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2013
   Google Scholar
• Nyborg WL. Solutions of the bio-heat transfer equation. Phys Med Biol 1989;33:785–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCRP Report 140: Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: II. Criteria based on all known mechanisms. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiological Protection and Measurements, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Shaw A, Martin E, Haller J, ter Haar GR. Dose for Ultrasound Therapy – What does it mean to you? Poster presented at 2014 International Society of Therapeutic Ultrasound conference, Las Vegas. Downloadable from https://doi.org/http://www.duty-project.eu. Accessed on 21 Jan 2015
   Google Scholar
• Duck FA. Acoustic dose and acoustic dose-rate. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009;35:1679–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck FA. A new definition for acoustic dose. J Phys Conf 2011;279:012006
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Kargl SG, Hwang JH. The effect of the scanning pathway in high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy on lesion production. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011;37:1457–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapareto SA, Dewey WC. Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 1984;10:787–800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC/TR 62799: Models for evaluation of thermal hazard in medical diagnostic ultrasonic fields, version 1. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2013
   Google Scholar
• McDannold N. Quantitative MRI-based temperature mapping based on the proton resonant frequency shift: Review of validation studies. Int J Hyperthermia 2005;21:533–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivens I, Shaw A, Civale J, & Morris H. Treatment monitoring and thermometry for therapeutic focused ultrasound. Int J Hypertherm 2007;23:121–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarmolenko PS, Moon EJ, Landon C, Manzoor A, Hochman DW, Viglianti BL, et al. Thresholds for thermal damage to normal tissues: An update. Int J Hypertherm 2011;27:320–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin E, Shaw A, Faruqui N, Shaw M. Accurate quantification and delivery of thermal dose to cells in culture. J Acoust Soc Am 2013;134:4182
   Google Scholar
• Chen W-S, Brayman AA, Matula TJ, Crum LA. Inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis produced in vitro with or without Optison. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:725–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber PE, Debus J. Tumor cytotoxicity and radical formation in vitro depend on the shock wave-induced cavitation dose. Radiation Res 2001;156:301–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller MW, Miller DL, Brayman AA. A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996;22:1131–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth K, Salgaonkar VA, Corregan NM, Holland CK, Mast TD. Spatial specificity and sensitivity of passive cavitation imaging for monitoring high-intensity focused ultrasound thermal ablation in ex vivo bovine liver. Proc Meet Acoust 2013;19:075022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li T, Chen H, Khokhlova T, Wang YN, Kreider W, He X, et al. Passive cavitation detection during pulsed HIFU exposures of ex vivo tissues and in vivo mouse pancreatic tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014;40:1523–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Nyborg WL. Ultrasound, cavitation bubbles and their interaction with cells. Adv Drug Del Rev 2008;60:1103–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell AD, Cain CA, Hall TL, Fowlkes JB, Xu Z. Probability of cavitation for single ultrasound pulses applied to tissues and tissue-mimicking materials. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013;39:449–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park MJ, Kim YS, Rhim H, Lim HK. Safety and therapeutic efficacy of complete or near-complete ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroid tumors by MR imaging-guided high-intensity focused US therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014;25:231–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouzet S, Murat FJ, Pasticier G, Cassier P, Chapelon JY, Gelet A. High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for prostate cancer: Current clinical status, outcomes and future perspectives. Int J Hyperthermia 2010;26:796–803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furusawa H, Namba K, Nakahara H, Tanaka C, Yasuda Y, Hirabara E, et al. The evolving non-surgical ablation of breast cancer: MR guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS). Breast Cancer 2007;14:55–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer K, Gedroyc W, Jolesz FA. Focused ultrasound as a local therapy for liver cancer. Cancer J 2010;16:118–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli A, Anzidei M, Marincola BC, Brachetti G, Noce V, Boni F, et al. MR imaging guided focused ultrasound for treatment of bone metastasis. Radiographics 2013;33:1555–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias WJ, Huss D, Voss T, Loomba J, Khaled M, Zadicario E, et al. A pilot study of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor. N Engl J Med 2013;369:640–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw C, ter Haar G, Rivens I, Giussani D, Lees C. Pathophysiological mechanisms of high intensity focused ultrasound mediated vascular occlusion and relevance to non-invasive fetal surgery. J Royal Soc Interface 2014;11:20140029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charrel T, Birer A, Chavrier F, Romano F, Chapelon J-Y, Denis P, et al. Development of a miniaturized HIFU device for glaucoma treatment with conformal coagulation of the ciliary bodies. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011;37:742–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackmann M, Delius, M, et al. Shock-wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones. N Engl J Med 1988;318:393–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake AM, Hall TL, Kieran K, Fowlkes JB, Cain CA, Roberts WW. Histotripsy: Minimally invasive technology for prostatic tissue ablation in an in vivo canine model. Urology 2008;72:682–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Smet M, Heijman E, Langereis S, Hijnen NM, Grull H. Magnetic resonance imaging of high intensity focused ultrasound mediated drug delivery from temperature-sensitive liposomes: An in vivo proof-of-concept study. J Control Release 2011;150:102–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pounder N, Harrison A. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound for fracture healing: A review of the clinical evidence and the associated biological mechanism of action. Ultrasonics 2008;48:330–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker K, Robertson V, Duck F. A review of therapeutic ultrasound: Biophysical effects. J Women Health Phys Ther 2010;34:71–124
   Google Scholar
• Clarke RH, Valentin J. The history of ICRP and the evolution of its policies. ICRP Publication 109. Ann ICRP 2009;39:75–110
   Google Scholar
• ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:2–4
   Google Scholar
• Dewey WC. Arrhenius relationships from the molecule and cell to the clinic. Int J Hyperthermia 1994;10:457–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw A, Hodnett M. Calibration and measurement issues for therapeutic ultrasound. Ultrasonics 2008;48:234–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haller J, Jenderka K-V, Durando G, Shaw A. A comparative evaluation of three hydrophones and a numerical model in high intensity focused ultrasound fields. J Acoust Soc Am 2012;131:1121–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill CR, Rivens I, Vaughan MG, ter Haar GR. Lesion development in focused ultrasound surgery: A general model. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994;20:259–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Physical Laboratory. Available from http://www.npl.co.uk/acoustics/ultrasonics/products-and-services/calibration-of-ultrasound-hydrophones (accessed 21 Nov 2014)
   Google Scholar