Metamemory adjustments over time in adults with and without traumatic brain injury

References

• Prigatano GP, Altman IM. Impaired awareness of behavioral limitations after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1990; 71: 1058–1064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Schachter DL. Awareness of deficit after brain injury: Clinical and theoretical issues. Oxford University Press, New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe F, Dockree P, Moloney P, Carton S, Robertson I. Awareness of deficits in traumatic brain injury: A multidimensional approach to assessing metacognitive knowledge and online awareness. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2007; 13: 38–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson TO, (Ed.). Metacognition: Core readings. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1992
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy MRT, Yorkston KM. The effects of frontal injury on ‘on-line’ self-monitoring during verbal learning by adults with diffuse brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2004; 14: 449–465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Woo E. Memory self-awareness and memory self-monitoring following severe closed-head injury. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 997–1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Anderson J. Feeling-of-knowing in episodic memory following moderate-to-severe closed-head injury. Neuropsychology 2007; 21: 224–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell J. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 1979; 34: 906–911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiede K. The importance of monitoring and self-regulation during multitrial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999; 6: 662–667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky J, Hertzog C, Kennedy MRT, Thiede KW. The self-monitoring approach for effective learning. Cognitive Technology 2005; 10: 4–11
   Google Scholar
• Thiede KW, Anderson MC, Therrialt D. Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of text. Journal of Educational Psychology 2003; 95: 66–73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MRT, Carney E, Peters S. Predictions of recall and study strategy decisions after diffuse brain injury. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 1043–1064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky J, Kubat-Silman AK, Hertzog C. Training monitoring skills improves older adults’ self-paced associative learning. Psychology and Aging 2003; 18: 340–350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy M, Coelho C, Turkstra L, Ylvisaker M, Moore Sohlberg M, Yorkston K, Chiou H, Kan P. Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2008; 18: 257–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson TO, Dunlosky J. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The ‘delayed-JOL effect’. Psychological Science 1991; 2: 267–270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen WL, Weaver CA, III. Enhanced metamemory at delays: Why do judgments of learning improve over time?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1997; 23: 1394–1409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheck P, Meeter M, Nelson TO. Anchoring effects in the absolute accuracy of immediate versus delayed judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language 2004; 51: 71–79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball D, Metcalf J. Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory. Memory & Cognition 2003; 6: 918–929
   Google Scholar
• Koriat A. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1997; 126: 349–370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky J, Matvey G. Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): Effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001; 27: 1180–1191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks BM. Primacy and recency in primed free association and associative cued recall. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1999; 6: 479–485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MR, Yorkston KM, Rogers M. Self-monitoring abilities of two adults with traumatic brain injury during verbal learning. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1995; 4: 159–163
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy MRT, Yorkston KM. Accuracy of metamemory after traumatic brain injury: Predictions during verbal learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2000; 43: 1072–1086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire MJ, Maki RH. When knowing more means less: The effect of fan on metamemory judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001; 27: 1172–1179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kennedy MRT. Self-monitoring recall during two tasks after traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2004; 13: 142–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlund MW. Self awareness: Effects of feedback and review on verbal self reports and remembering following brain injury. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 375–380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barona A, Reynolds C, Chastain R. A demographically based index of premorbid intelligence for the WAIS-R. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1984; 5: 885–887
   Google Scholar
• Reitan R, Wolfson D. Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery. Neuropsychology Press, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 1985
   Google Scholar
• Weschler D. Weschler memory scale-III. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 1997
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Baddeley A, Evans J, Shiel A. Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impaired people. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1994; 4: 307–326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MRT. Retrospective confidence judgments made by adults with traumatic brain injury: Relative and absolute accuracy. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 469–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar