How best to orient travellers with acquired brain injury: A comparison of three directional prompts

References

• Whiteneck GG, Gerhart KA, Cusick CP. Identifying environmental factors that influence the outcomes of people with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2004; 19: 191–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker T. Community members with disabilities participate in designing new lane transit district vehicles. Easter Seals Project ACTION Update 2005; 16: 1–2
   Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Todis B, Fickas S, Hung P, Lemoncello R. A profile of community navigation in adults with chronic cognitive impairments. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 1249–1259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groce MM. A model of a travel training program—the New York City Board of Education Travel Training Program. National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities Transition Summary 1996; 9: 10–13
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch N, Shenon M, Spirl E, Rowan J, Simpson R, Schreckenghost D, LoPresti EF. Web-based assistive technology interventions for cognitive impairments after traumatic brain injury: A selective review and two case studies. Rehabilitation Psychology 2004; 49: 200–212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Fickas S, Hung P, Fortier A. A comparison of four prompt modes for route finding for community travelers with severe cognitive impairments. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 531–538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michon P, Denis M. When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions?. Spatial information theory: Foundations of geographic information science., DR Montello. Springer, Berlin 2001; 292–305
   Google Scholar
• Daniel M, Denis M. The production of route directions: Investigating conditions that favour conciseness in spatial discourse. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2004; 18: 57–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky B, Lee PU. Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. Spatial information theory: Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science., C Freska, DM Mark. Springer, Berlin 1999; 51–64
   Google Scholar
• Lovelace KL, Hegarty M, Montello DR. Elements of good route directions in familiar and unfamiliar environments. Spatial information theory: Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science., C Freska, DM Mark. Springer, Berlin 1999; 65–82
   Google Scholar
• Schneider LF, Taylor HA. How do you get there from here? Mental representations of route descriptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1999; 13: 415–441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeter LA, Vitello D, Wonsiewicz SA. How to tell people where to go: Comparing navigation aids. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies 1985; 22: 546–562
   Google Scholar
• Denis M, Pazzaglia F, Cornoldi C, Bertolo L. Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1999; 13: 145–174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tom A, Denis M. Language and spatial cognition: Comparing the roles of landmarks and street names in route instructions. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2004; 18: 1213–1230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaDuke RO, LaGrow SJ. Photo-bus-route-map: An intervention to produce independence in bus travel for mentally retarded adults. Mental Retardation and Learning Disabilities Bulletin 1984; 12: 71–75
   Google Scholar
• Kirasic KC. Age differences in adults’ spatial abilities, learning environmental layout, and wayfinding behavior. Spatial Cognition and Computation 2000; 2: 117–134
   Google Scholar
• Lawton CA. Gender differences in wayfinding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles 1994; 30: 765–779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N. Cognitive-linguistic quick test. Pearson, San Antonio 2001
   Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Johnson L, Paule L, Raskin SA, Mateer CA. Attention process training II: A program to address attentional deficits for persons with mild cognitive dysfunction. Lash & Associates, Wake Forest, NC 1994
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland A, Harris JE, Baddeley AD. Do laboratory tests predict everyday memory? A neuropsychological study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1983; 22: 341–357
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Alderman N, Burgess P, Emslie HC, Evans JJ. The behavioral assessment of dysexecutive syndrome. Thames Valley Test Company, SuffolkUK 1996
   Google Scholar
• Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1992
   Google Scholar
• Glass GV, Hopkins KD. Statistical methods in education and psychology. 3rd ed. Allyn & Bacon, Boston 1996
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. Academic Press, New York 1988
   Google Scholar
• Glenn MB, Rotman M, Goldstein R, Selleck EA. Characteristics of residential community integration programs for adults with brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 20: 393–401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl M, Davies D, Carlson P, Johnston J, Harrick L, Minnes P, Shue K. Transitions to independent living after ABI. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 311–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemoncello R, Sohlberg MM, Fickas S. When directions fail–Investigation of getting lost behavior in adults with acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2010; 24: 550–559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar