Predictive utility of weekly post-traumatic amnesia assessments after brain injury: A multicentre analysis

References

• Russell WR. Cerebral involvement in head injury: A study based on the examination of two hundred cases. Brain 1932; 55: 549–603
   Google Scholar
• Russell RW, Smith A. Post-traumatic amnesia in closed head injury. Archives of Neurology 1961; 5: 16–29
   Google Scholar
• Levin HS, O’Donnell VM, Grossman RG. The Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test. A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1979; 167: 675–684
   Google Scholar
• van Zomeren AH, van den Burg W. Residual complaints of patients two years after severe head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 21–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishara SN, Partridge FM, Godfrey HP, Knight RG. Post-traumatic amnesia and Glasgow Coma Scale related to outcome in survivors in a consecutive series of patients with severe closed-head injury. Brain Injury 1992; 6: 373–380
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz DI, Alexander MP. Traumatic brain injury. Predicting course of recovery and outcome for patients admitted to rehabilitation. Archives of Neurology 1994; 51: 661–670
   Google Scholar
• Ellenberg JH, Levin HS, Saydjari C. Posttraumatic amnesia as a predictor of outcome after severe closed head injury. Prospective assessment. Archives of Neurology 1996; 53: 782–791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafonte RD, Mann NR, Millis SR, Black KL, Wood DL, Hammond F. Posttraumatic amnesia: Its relation to functional outcome. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997; 78: 1103–1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Naalt J, van Zomeren AH, Sluiter WJ, Minderhoud JM. One year outcome in mild to moderate head injury: The predictive value of acute injury characteristics related to complaints and return to work. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1999; 66: 207–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deirdre RD, Levine B, Schwartz ML, Stuss DT. Acute predictors of real-world outcomes following traumatic brain injury: A prospective study. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 221–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Guise E, Leblanc J, Feyz M, Lamoureux J. Prediction of the level of cognitive functional independence in acute care following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 1087–1093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown AW, Malec JF, McClelland RL, Diehl NN, Englander J, Cifu DX. Clinical elements that predict outcome after traumatic brain injury: A prospective multicenter recursive partitioning (decision-tree) analysis. Journal of Neurotrauma 2005; 22: 1040–1051, [Erratum appears in Journal of Neurotrauma 2005;22:1503.]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde EA, Bigler ED, Pedroza C, Ryser DK. Post-traumatic amnesia predicts long-term cerebral atrophy in traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 695–699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Semik P. Measurement properties of the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) and improvement patterns during inpatient rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2000; 15: 637–655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson WT, Novack TA, Dowler RN. Effective serial measurement of cognitive orientation in rehabilitation: The Orientation Log. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998; 79: 718–720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novack TA, Dowler RN, Bush BA, Glen T, Schneider JJ. Validity of the Orientation Log, relative to the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2000; 15: 957–961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey KL, Rojas DC, Anderson CA, Arciniegas DB. Comparison of the O-Log and GOAT as measures of posttraumatic amnesia. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 513–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan TM, Jongen EL, Greenwood RJ. Assessment of post-traumatic amnesia after severe closed head injury: Retrospective or prospective?. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1996; 60: 422–427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC, Hens MM. Functional assessment scales: A study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1990; 71: 870–875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1993; 74: 531–536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 127–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boake C. Supervision rating scale: A measure of functional outcome from brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996; 77: 765–772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale GM, Pettigrew LE, Wilson JT, Murray G, Jennett B. Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: A review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Journal of Neurotrauma 1998; 15: 587–597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for their use. Journal of Neurotrauma 1998; 15: 573–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams BJ, Mandrekar JN, Mandrekar SJ, Cha SS, Furth AF. Finding optimal cutpoints for continuous covariates with binary and time-to-event outcomes. Technical report, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic. June, 2006; 79
   Google Scholar
• Therneau TM, Atkinson EJ. An introduction to recursive partitioning using the RPART routines. Technical report, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic. November, 1997; 61
   Google Scholar
• Nakase-Richardson R, Sepehri A, Sherer M, Yablon SA, Evans C, Mani T. Classification schema of posttraumatic amnesia duration-based injury severity relative to 1-year outcome: Analysis of individuals with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009; 90: 17–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993; 8: 86–87
   Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Draper K, Schonberger M. Functional outcome 10 years after traumatic brain injury: Its relationship with demographic, injury severity, and cognitive and emotional status. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2008; 14: 233–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Sander AM, Nick TG, High WM, Malec JF, Rosenthal M. Early cognitive status and productivity outcome after traumatic brain injury: Findings from the TBI model systems. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2002; 83: 183–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakase-Richardson R, Yablon SA, Sherer M. Prospective comparison of acute confusion severity with duration of post-traumatic amnesia in predicting employment outcome after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2007; 78: 872–876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Pfaff A, Jurjevic L. Resolution of disorientation and amnesia during post-traumatic amnesia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2000; 68: 178–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Pfaff A, Baguley IJ, Marosszeky JE, Gurka JA, Hodgkinson AE, King C, Lane-Brown AT, Hanna J. A multicentre, randomised trial examining the effect of test procedures measuring emergence from post-traumatic amnesia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2006; 77: 841–849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Willmott C, Rothwell A, Kelly AM, Nelms R, Ng KT. Use of the Westmead PTA scale to monitor recovery of memory after mild head injury. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 603–614, [Erratum appears in Brain Injury 2004;18:1065]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Harrison-Felix C, Bogner J, Dijkers M, Terrill MS, Whiteneck G. Systematic bias in traumatic brain injury outcome studies because of loss to follow-up. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 153–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar