Issues of loss to follow-up in a population study of traumatic brain injury (TBI) followed to 3 years post-trauma

References

• Corrigan JD, Harrison-Felix MS, Bogner J, Dijkers M, Sendroy Terrill M, Whiteneck G. Systematic bias in traumatic brain injury outcome studies because of loss to follow up. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 153–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Bogner JA, Mysiw J, Clinchot D, Fugate L. Systematic bias in outcome studies of persons with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997; 78: 132–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribisl JM, Walton MA, Mowbay CT, Luke DA, Davidson WS, Bootsmiller BJ, Minimizing participant attrition in panel studies through the use of effective retention and tracking strategies: review and recommendations. Available online at: http/www.sciencedirect.com/science, accessed 26 February 2007
   Google Scholar
• Stuart M. Fighting the silent epidemic. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2004; 19: 329–340
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langlois JA, Marr A, Mitchko J, Johnson RL. Tracking the silent epidemic and educating the public. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 20: 196–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Wald MM. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006; 21: 375–378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein A, Rapport M. Mild traumatic brain injury: The silent epidemic. Canadian Journal of Public Health 2000; 91: 325–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Holm L, Kraus J, Coronado VG. Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: The World Health Organisation collaborating centre tasks force on mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2004, Suppl 43: 113–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sander AM, Kreutzer HS, Rosenthal M, Delmonico R, Young ME. A multicenter longitudinal investigation of return to work and community integration following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1996; 11: 70–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver JH, Ponsford JL, Curran CA. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 841–848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Olver J, Ponsford M, Nelms R. Long-term adjustment of families following traumatic brain injury where comprehensive rehabilitation has been provided. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 453–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomberg T, Toomela A, Ennok M, Tikk A. Changes in coping strategies, social support, optimism and health related quality of life following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 497–488
   Google Scholar
• Hammond FM, Hart T, Bushnik T, Corrigan JD, Sasser H. Change and predictors of change in communication, cognition and social function between one and five years after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2004; 19: 314–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labi MLC, Brentjens M, Coad ML, Flynn WJ, Zielezny M. Development to a longitudinal study of complications and functional outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 265–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickelsimer EE, Selassie AW, Kook Gu J, Langlois JA. A population based outcomes study of persons hospitalised with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006; 21: 491–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulemeijer M, Sieberen P, Van Der, Wer F, Jacobs B, Biert J, Van Vugt AB, Brauer JMP, Vos PE. Impact of additional extracranial injuries on outcome after mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma 2006; 23: 1561–1569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Naalt J, Van Zomeren AH, Sluiter WJ, Minderhoud JM. One year outcome in mild to moderate head injury: The predictive value of acute injury characteristics related to complaints and return to work. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1999; 66: 207–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakola AS, Muller K, Larsen M, Waterloo K, Romner B, Ingerbrigtse T. Five-year outcome after mild head injury: Aspective controlled study. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 2007; 115: 398–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynods S, Paniak C, Toller-Lobe G, Nagy J. A longitudinal study of compensation-seeking and return to work in a treated mild traumatic brain injury sample. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2003; 18: 139–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraus J, Schaffer K, Ayers K, Stenehjem J, Shen H, Afifi AA. Physical complaints, medical service use and social and employment changes following mild traumatic brain injury: A six month longitudinal study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 20: 239–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boake C, McCauley SR, Pedroza C, Levin HS, Brown SA, Brudage SI. Lost productive work time after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury with and without hospitalisation. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 994–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stålanacke B, Bjornsig U, Karlsson K, Sojka P. One-year follow up of mild traumatic brain injury: Post-concussion symptoms, disabilities and life satisfaction in relation to serum levels of S-100B and neuron-specific enolase in acute phase. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2005; 37: 300–305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bazarian J, Wong T, Harris M, Leahey N, Mookerjee S, Dombovy M. Epidemiology and predictors of post-concussive syndrome after minor head injury in an emergency population. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 173–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stålanacke B-M. Community integration, social support and life satisfaction in relation to symptoms 3 years after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 933–942
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraus J, Schaffer K, Ayers K, Stenehjem J, Shen H, Afifi AA. Physical complaints, medical service use and social and employment changes following mild traumatic brain injury: A six month longitudinal study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 20: 239–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff R. Two decades of advances in understanding of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 20: 5–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Report to Congress on mild traumatic brain injury in the United States: Steps to prevent a serious public health problem. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune N, Wen X, The definition, incidence and prevalence of acquired brain injury in Australia. AIHW cat. No. DIS15. Canberra: AIHW; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL, McDonald S, Lulham JM. Incidence of hospital-treated traumatic brain injury in an Australian community. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 1998; 22: 419–423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slatyer M, Skilbeck CE, Marsden K, Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Tasmania 1993–2003. Brain Injury Association of Tasmania Conference, Launceston, Tasmania. May 2004
   Google Scholar
• Hillier SL, Hiller JE, Metzer J. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in South Australia. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 649–659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas M, Skilbeck CE, Slatyer MA. Pre-injury estimates of subjective quality of life following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2009; 23: 516–527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NEG, Wade DT. The Rivermead post concussion symptoms questionnaire: A measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. Journal of Neurology 1995; 242: 581–592
   Google Scholar
• Silver JM, McAllister TM, Yudofsky SC. The textbook of traumatic brain injury. American Psychiatric Publishing, Alington, VA 2005; 279–308
   Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatry 1975; 12: 189–198
   Google Scholar
• Russell WR, Smith A. Post traumatic amnesia in closed head injury. Archives of Neurology 1961; 5: 16–29
   Google Scholar
• Tabchnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariante analysis, 4th. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1995
   Google Scholar