Moving from aged care facilities to community-based accommodation: Outcomes and environmental factors

References

• Lanno E, Larmuseau D, Van Hoorde W, Eyssen M. Prevalence of young adults with acquired brain injury (ABI) in nursing homes in Belgium: Aged care facilities are not the best option. Brain Injury 2008; 22(1)49
   Google Scholar
• McMillan TM, Laurie M. Young adults with acquired brain injury in nursing homes in Glasgow. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004; 18: 132–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulsby G. Returning to the community – issues in placing people with complex care needs following brain injury in their own homes. Brain Injury 2008; 22(1)155–156
   Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Farnworth L, Sloan S. People under 60 living in aged care facilities in Victoria. Australian Health Review 2006; 30: 100–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abello D, Muir K, Quality of life’ outcomes reporting for younger people with disabilities in residential aged care; draft final report. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Table at 30 June 2006 by state/territory and age group. Adelaide, SA: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Sloan S, Callaway L, Younger people in residential aged care: Support needs, preferences and future directions. Melbourne, Victoria: Summer Foundation Limited; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Report of study to review levels of services and responses in need in a sample of Ontario long term care facilities and select comparators. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Health and Long Term Care; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Families Housing Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. Younger people with disability in residential aged care program. Available online at: http://www.fahcsia.gov.au/sa/disability/progserv/people/ypdracp/Pages/default.aspx, accessed 29 January 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services. Acquired brain injury strategic plan. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Human Services; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Papastrat LA. Outcome and value following brain injury: A financial provider's perspective. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1992; 7: 11–23
   Google Scholar
• State of Victoria. Intellectually Disabled Persons’ Services Act 1986. Act No. 53/1986; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• State of Victoria. Disability Services Act 1991. Act No. 80/1991; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• State of Victoria. Disability Act 2006. Act No. 23/2006; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Aged Care Price Review Taskforce. Review of pricing arrangements in residential aged care – Full report. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth Department of Health & Ageing; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer K. Study into the accommodation needs for young people requiring nursing home level of care. Melbourne City Mission, Melbourne, Victoria 1999
   Google Scholar
• Strettles B, Bush M, Simpson G, Gillet L. Accommodation in NSW for adults with high care needs after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit, Liverpool Health Service, Sydney, NSW 2005
   Google Scholar
• Senate Community Affairs References Committee. Community Affairs References Committee: Quality and equity in aged care. Canberra ACT: The Senate; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Residential aged care in Australia 2004–05: A statistical overview. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2006. Report nr AIHW Cat. No. AGE 43.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron C, Pirozzo S, Tooth L. Long-term care of people below age 65 with severe acquired brain injury: Appropriateness of aged care facilities. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2001; 25: 261–264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moylan M, Dey P, McAlpine E. A national research project examining the placement of younger people with a disability in nursing homes for the aged: Data supplement. NSW Department of Community Services, Sydney, NSW 1995
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Families Housing Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. Younger people with disability in residential aged care program. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Department of Families Housing Community Services and Indigenous Affairs; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Shorten B, Speech: Bill Shorten MP, Parliamentary Secretary for Disabilities and Children's Services. Shaping the Future Today. Moonee Valley Racing Club Convention Centre, Melbourne; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Gallop J, Board of Inquiry into Disability Services: Final report part 1. Canberra: Disability ACT; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services. Creating new opportunities: Responding to the needs of younger people in Victoria's residential Aged Care Services. Melbourne, Victoria: Department of Human Services; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Regnier V, Denton A. Ten new and emerging trends in residential group environments. NeuroRehabilitation 2009; 15: 169–188
   Google Scholar
• Roberts K, Taykor B. Nursing research processes: An Australian perspective. Nelson, Melbourne, Victoria 1998
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A. Awareness of dying. Weidebnfeld and Nicolson, London 1965
   Google Scholar
• Richards L. Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. Sage Publications Pty Ltd, LondonUK 2005
   Google Scholar
• Schofield M. Sampling in quantitative research. Research methods for nursing and health science, 2nd, V Minichiello, G Sullivan, K Greenwood, R Axford. Pearson Education Australia, Sydney, NSW 2004
   Google Scholar
• Sloan S. Acquired brain injury slow to recover program. Report of the Therapy Review Program. Osborn Sloan & Associates Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria 2008
   Google Scholar
• Transport Accident Commission. Transport Accident Commission. Melbourne, Victoria: Transport Accident Commission. Available online at: http://www.tac.vic.gov.au, accessed 29 January 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson B, Scott-Findlay S. Critical issues in interviewing people with traumatic brain injury. Qualitative Health Research 2002; 12: 399–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd, NVivo 2.0.: Melbourne, Victoria: International Pty Ltd; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Chua K, Chuo A, Kong KH. Urinary incontinence after traumatic brain injury: Incidence, outcomes and correlates. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 469–478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foxx-Orenstein A, Kolakowsky-Hayner S, Marwitz JH, Cify DX, Dunbar A, Englander J, Francisco G. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of fecal incontinence after acute brain injury: Findings from the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems national database. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 231–237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Continence Foundation of Australia. Funding Schemes for continence products. Available online at: http://www.continence.org.au/client_images/801897.pdf, accessed 8 November 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Shimada H, Tiedemann A, Lord SR, Suzuki T. Falls: The effect of enhanced supervision on fall rates in residential aged care. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2009; 88: 823–828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreca S, Velikonja D, Brown L, Williams L, Davis L, Sigouin C. Evaluation of the effectiveness of two clinical training procedures to elicit yes/no reponses from patients with severe acquired brain injury: A randomized single-subject design. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 1065–1075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates PJ. Psychological adjustment, social enablement and community integration following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2003; 13: 291–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou S, Boldy DP, Lee AH. Factors influencing residents’ satisfaction in residential aged care. Gerontologist 2003; 43: 459–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason T. Scatolia: Psychosis to protest. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2008; 3: 303–311
   Google Scholar
• Kelly G, Winkler D. Long-term accomodation and support for people with higher levels of challenging behaviour. Brain Impairment 2007; 8: 262–275
   Google Scholar
• VicHealth. Social inclusion as a determinant of mental health and wellbeing. Melbourne, Victoria: VicHealth; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Unsworth C, Sloan S. Factors that lead to successful community integration following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006; 21: 8–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Inclusion Unit. The Australian public service social inclusion policy design and delivery toolkit. In: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, editor. Canberra: Blue Star; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight J. The careless society: Community and its counterfeits. Basic Books, New York 1995
   Google Scholar
• Callaway L, Sloan S, Winkler D. Maintaining and developing friendships following severe traumatic brain injury: Principles of occupational therapy practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 2005; 52: 262–263
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL. Long-term outcomes and support needs after traumatic brain injury: A 20–26 year perspective. In: Contole J, editor. From hospital to … Where? Melbourne, Victoria: Victorian Brain Injury Recovery Association Inc; 2003. pp. 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Burleigh SA, Farber RS, Gillard M. Community integration and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury: Long-term findings. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1998; 52: 45–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eames P, Cotterill G, Kneale TA, Storrar AL, Yeomans P. Outcome of intensive rehabilitation after severe brain injury: A long-term follow-up study. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 631–650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver J, Ponsford JL, Curren CA. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain injury 1996; 10: 841–848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Tasman. ACIL, Efficient workforce structures in the Australian aged care sector. Melbourne, Victoria: ACIL Tasman Pty Ltd; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Martin B, King D. Who cares for older Australians? A picture of the residential and community based aged care workforce 2007. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, ACT 2008
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental inpatients and other inmates. Doubleday, New York 1961
   Google Scholar
• Sloan S, Winkler D, Anson K. Long-term outcome following traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment 2007; 8: 251–261
   Google Scholar
• Jones G, Lawn R, The young people in nursing homes project: The efficiency and effectiveness of project management structures. Perth, WA: E-QUAL; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Jones G, Lawn R. The young people in nursing homes project evaluation: The history of the YPINH Project from 1995 to 1997. Disability Services Commission of Western Australia, Perth, WA 1999
   Google Scholar
• Jones G, Lawn R. The young people in nursing homes project evaluation: Evaluation of the individual planning process. Disability Services Commission of Western Australia, Perth, WA 1999
   Google Scholar
• ACT Government Department of Disability, Housing and Community Services. Acquired brain injury project research paper. Canberra, ACT: ACT Government Department of Disability Housing and Community Services; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Fyffe C, McCubbery J, Honey K. Young people with ABI less than 65 years requiring nursing home level of care. Melbourne. Grimwood Pty Ltd, Victoria 2003
   Google Scholar
• Sloan S, Callaway L, Winkler D, McKinley K, Ziino C, Anson K. The community approach to participation: Outcomes following acquired brain injury intervention. Brain Impairment 2009; 10: 282–294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan S, Callaway L, Winkler D, McKinley K, Ziino C, Anson K. Changes in care and support needs following community-based intervention for individuals with acquired brain injury. Brain Impairment 2009; 10: 295–306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UDS Data Management Service, Guide for use of the Uniform Data Set for medical rehabilitation including the Functional Independence Measure (version 3.1). Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1990
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL. Assessing support needs for people with traumatic brain injury: The care and needs scale (CANS). Brain Injury 2004; 18: 445–460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleminger S, Leigh E, Eames P, Langrell L, Nagraj R, Logsdail S. HoNOS-ABI: A reliable outcome measure of neuropsychiatric sequelae to brain injury?. Psychiatric Bulletin 2005; 29: 53–55
   Google Scholar
• Kelly G, Todd J, Simpson G, Kremer P, Martin C. The Overt Behaviour Scale (OBS): A tool for measuring challenging behaviours following ABI in community settings. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 307–319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley F, Kielhofner G, Barris R, Reichler RK. The Role Checklist: Development and empirical assessment of reliability. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 1986; 6: 157–170
   Google Scholar
• Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer J, Gordon W, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for TBI. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993; 8: 11–23
   Google Scholar
• Sloan S, Winkler D, Callaway L. Community integration following severe traumatic brain injury: Outcomes and best practice. Brain Impairment 2004; 5: 12–29
   Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Sloan S, Callaway L, Truscott C. Younger people in residential aged care in Tasmania: Characteristics, support needs and preferences. Summer Foundation Limited, Melbourne 2008
   Google Scholar
• Cummins RA, Lau ALD. Personal Wellbeing Index – Intellectual Disability (English), 3rd. Deakin University, Manual. Melbourne 2005
   Google Scholar
• Cummins RA, Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale – Intellectual/Cognitive Disability, 5th ed. (ComQol-I5). Melbourne: Deakin University; 1997
   Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Davies D, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P. The community integration measure: Development and preliminary validation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001; 82: 429–434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felce D. Quality of support for ordinary living. Deinstitutionalisation and community living, J Mansell, K Ericsson. Chapman and Hall, London 1996; 81–96
   Google Scholar
• Mansell J, Ericsson K. Conclusion: Integration diverse experience. Deinstitutionalisation and community living, J Mansell, K Ericsson. Chapman and Hall, London 1996; 242–253
   Google Scholar
• Ball K, We don’t live in our homes, we live in our carers’ workplace. Link Magazine 2001;10:14
   Google Scholar