416
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Outcomes of participation objective, participation subjective (POPS) measure following traumatic brain injury

, , , , &
Pages 266-273 | Received 27 Feb 2009, Accepted 20 Nov 2010, Published online: 31 Jan 2011

References

  • Baum FE, Bush RA, Modra CC, Murray CJ, Cox EM, Alexander KM, Potter RC. Epidemiology of participation: An Australian community study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2000; 54: 414–423
  • Cicerone KD. Participation as an outcome of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Jounal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2004; 19: 494–501
  • Brown M, Dijkers M, Gordon W, Ashman T, Charantz H, Cheng Z. Participation objective, participation subjective. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2004; 19: 459–481
  • Alston M. Globalisation, rural restructuring and health service delivery in Australia: Policy failure and the role of social work?. Health and Social Care in the Community 2007; 15: 195–202
  • Vella-Brodrick D, Scannell E, Judd F, Burney S. Examining quality of life among rural, remote and urban residents of Victoria, in 6th Australian Conference on Quality of Life: Understanding Subjective Wellbeing. Melbourne, 2004.
  • Hiller S, Hiller J, Metzer J. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in South Australia. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 649–659
  • Fleming J, Tooth L, Hassell M, Chan W. Prediction of community integration and vocational outcome 2–5 years after TBI rehabilitation in Australia. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 417–431
  • Fyffe C, McCubbery J. ‘If only we had somewhere to turn…’ The service needs of people with acquired brain injury in a rural community. Australian Journal of Rural Health 1996; 4: 232–236
  • Harradine PG, Winstandley JB, Tate R, Cameron ID, Baguley IJ, Harris RD. Severe traumatic brain injury in New South Wales: Comparable outcomes for rural and urban residents. The Medical Journal of Australia 2004; 181: 130–134
  • Farmer JE, Clark MJ, Sherman AK. Rural versus urban social support seeking as a variable in traumatic brain injury outcome. Jounal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2003; 18: 116–127
  • Minnes P, Carlson P, McColls M, Nolte M, Johnston J, Buell K. Community integration: A useful construct, but what does it really mean?. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 149–159
  • Winkler D, Unsworth C, Sloan S. Factors that lead to successful community integration following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006; 21: 8–21
  • World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organisation, Geneva 2001
  • Ponsford J. Traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove 1995
  • Nightingale E, Soo C, Tate R. A systematic review of early prognostic factors for return to work after traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment 2007; 8: 101–142
  • Lefebvre H, Cloutier G, Levert MJ. Perspectives of survivors of traumatic brain injury and their caregivers on long-term social integration. Brain Injury 2008; 22: 535–543
  • Trewin D, Pink B. Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations, S.N.Z. Australian Bureau of Statistics, editor. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2006.
  • Hoofien D, Gilboa A, Vakil E, Donovick PJ. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10-20 years later: A comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 189–209
  • Fearnside M, Gurka J. The challenge of traumatic brain injury. Medical Journal of Australia 1997; 167: 293–294
  • Avesani R, Salvi L, Rigoli G, Gambini MG. Reintegration after severe brain injury: A retrospective study. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 933–939
  • Willemse-van Son AHP, Ribbers GM, Verhagen AP, Stam HJ. Prognostic factors of long-term functioning and productivity after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Clinical Rehabilitation 2007; 21: 1024–1037
  • Khan F, Baguley I, Cameron I. Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Medical Journal of Australia 2003; 178: 290–295
  • Isaki E, Turkstra L. Communication and work re-entry following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 441–453
  • Eriksson G, Tham K, Fugi-Meyer A. Couples' happiness and its relationship to functioning in everyday life after brain injury. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2005; 12: 40–48
  • Katz S, Kravetz S, Grynbaum F. Wives' coping flexibility, time since since husbands' injury and perceived burden of wives of men with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 81–90
  • Gosling J, Oddy M. Rearranged marriages: Marital relationships after head injury. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 785–796
  • British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine and Royal College of Physicians. Rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: National clinical guidelines. Royal College of Physicians, London 2003
  • Newberry L. A new direction? A follow-up study. Monash University, Melbourne 2001
  • Johnston MV, Shawaryn MA, Malec J, Kreutzer J, Hammond FM. The structure of functional and community outcomes following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2006; 29: 391–407
  • Johnstone B, Nossaman LD, Schopp LH, Holmquist L, Rupright SJ. Distribution of services and supports for people with traumatic brain injury in rural and urban Missouri. The Journal of Rural Health 2002; 18: 109–117
  • Kaplan C. The community integration questionnaire with new scoring guidelines: Concurrent validity and need for appropriate norms. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 725–731
  • Wagner AK, Hammond FM, Sasser HC, Wiercisiewski D, Norton HJ. Use of injury severity variables in determining disability and community integration after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection and Critical Care 2002; 49: 411–419
  • Parsons L, Stanley M. The lived experience of occupational adaptation following acquired brain injury for people living in a rural area. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 2008; 55: 231–238
  • Sprangers MAG, Schwartz CE. Integrating response-shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine 1999; 48: 1507–1515
  • Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of fundtioning and disability: What is it and what is it for?. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25: 596–601
  • Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levasseur M. ‘Optimal’ participation: A reflective look. Disability and Rehabilitation 2006; 28: 1231–1235

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.