The impact of communication partner and discourse task on a person with traumatic brain injury: The use of multiple perspectives

References

• Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Wald MM. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: A brief overview. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006; 21: 375–378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalpakjian CZ, Lam CS, Toussaint LL, Merbitz NKH. Describing quality of life and psychosocial outcomes after traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2004; 83: 255–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Hernandez R, Max JE, Kosier T, Paradiso S, Robinson RG. Social impairment and depression after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1997; 78: 1321–1326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, Youse KM, Le KN. Conversational discourse in closed-head-injured and non-brain-injured adults. Aphasiology 2002; 16: 659–672
   Google Scholar
• Togher L. Interpersonal communication skills in the traumatic brain injury population: an analysis across situations [Thesis Ph D]. Sydney, NSW: University of Sydney; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Hellawell DJ, Taylor RT, Pentland B. Cognitive and psychosocial outcome following moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 489–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersel DA, Marsh NV, Havill JH, Sleigh JW. Psychosocial functioning during the year following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 683–696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey HPD, Shum D. Executive functioning and the application of social skills following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2000; 14: 433–444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall RC, Karow CM, Morelli CA, Iden KK, Dixon J. Problem-solving by traumatically brain injured and neurologically intact subjects on an adaptation of the twenty questions test. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 589–608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal M. Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury3rd. F.A. Davis, Philadelphia, PA 1999
   Google Scholar
• Coelho CA. Management of discourse deficits following traumatic brain injury: Progress, caveats and needs. Seminars in Speech & Language 2007; 28: 122–135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ehrlich JS. Selective characteristics of narrative discourse in head-injured and normal adults. Journal of Communication Disorders 1988; 21: 1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentis M, Prutting CA. Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 1987; 30: 88–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coelho C, Ylvisaker M, Turkstra L. Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language 2005; 26: 223–241
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bond F, Godfrey HP. Conversation with traumatically brain-injured individuals: A controlled study of behavioural changes and their impact. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 319–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, Liles BZ, Duffy RJ. Analysis of conversational discourse in head-injured adults. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1991; 6: 92–98
   Google Scholar
• Marsh NV, Knight RG. Behavioral assessment of social competence following severe head injury. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 1991; 13: 729–740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: A follow-up study. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 911–935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilov AM, Togher L, Grant S. Problem solving with friends: Discourse participation and performance of individuals with and without traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2009; 23: 584–605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: Telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 169–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Taylor C, Aird V, Grant S. The impact of varied speaker role and communication partner on the communicative interactions of a person with traumatic brain injury: A single case study using systemic functional linguistics. Brain Impairment 2006; 7: 190–201
   Google Scholar
• Larkins B, Worrall L, Hickson L. Everyday communication activities of individuals with traumatic brain injury living in New Zealand. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing 1999; 4: 183–191
   Google Scholar
• Galski T, Tompkins C, Johnston MV. Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 769–782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM, O'Flaherty CA, Snow PC. Measuring perception of communicative ability: The development and evaluation of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Aphasiology 2000; 14: 251–268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM, Bracy CA, Snow PC. Measuring perceived communicative ability after traumatic brain injury: Teliability and validity of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2007; 22: 31–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Winckel J, Black S, Duchan JF, Simmons-Mackie N, Square P, Winckel J. A set of observational measures for rating support and participation in conversation between adults with aphasia and their conversation partners. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2004; 11: 67–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halliday MAK. An introduction to functional grammar2nd. E. Arnold, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Eggins S, Slade D. Analysing casual conversation. Cassell, London 1997
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. A new perspective on the relationship between communication impairment and disempowerment following head injury in information exchanges. Disability & Rehabilitation 1996; 18: 559–566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hands L, Code C. Measuring service encounters with the traumatic brain injury population. Aphasiology 1997; 11: 491–504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Body R, Parker M. The use of multiple informants in assessment of communication after traumatic brain injury. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury, C Code, S McDonald, L Togher. Psychology Press, Hove 1999; 147–174
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Tate R, Togher L, Bornhofen C, Long E, Gertler P, Bowen R. Social skills treatment for people with severe, chronic acquired brain injuries: A multicenter trial. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2008; 89: 1648–1659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Power E, McDonald S, Tate RL, Rietdijk R. Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: The adapted Kagan scales. Aphasiology 2010; 24: 914–927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamovich B, Henderson J. Scales of cognitive ability for traumatic brain injuryNormed. The Riverside Publishing Company, Chicago, IL 1992
   Google Scholar
• Togher L. TBI rehabilitation: the road less travelled. International Aphasia Research Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 24–27 July 2002
   Google Scholar
• Spencer EL. An investigation into how adults who stutter use language using systemic functional linguistics [Thesis Ph D]. Sydney, NSW: University of Sydney; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Berry M. Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: a multi-layered approach to exchange structure. Studies in discourse analysis, M Montgomery, M Coulthard. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1981; 120–145
   Google Scholar
• Martin JR. English text: System and structure. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Philadelphia, PA 1992
   Google Scholar
• Ventola E. The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. F. Pinter, London 1987
   Google Scholar
• Hunt KW. Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1970; 35: 1–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L. An analysis of interpersonal meanings: An introduction for speech pathologists. Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney 1998
   Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Bracy CA, Snow P. Exploring the factor structure of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire: Insights into the nature of communication deficits following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2007; 21: 1181–1194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCluskey A. Paid attendant carers hold important and unexpected roles which contribute to the lives of people with brain injury. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 943–957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney TJ, Urbanczyk B. Developing a positive communication culture for staff and family members. Staff development and clinical intervention in brain injury rehabilitation, CJ Durgin, ND Schmidt, LJ Fryer. Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg 1993; 57–81
   Google Scholar
• Braga LW, Da Paz AC, Ylvisaker M, Da Paz ACJ. Direct clinician-delivered versus indirect family-supported rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury: A randomized controlled trial. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 819–831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale GJ, Anselmi V, Johnston MV, Busichio K, Walsh V. A natural setting behavior management program for persons with acquired brain injury: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2006; 87: 1289–1297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Code C, Grant S. Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: Q randomised controlled trial. Aphasiology 2004; 18: 313–335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade SL, Michaud L, Brown TM, Wade SL, Michaud L, Brown TM. Putting the pieces together: Preliminary efficacy of a family problem-solving intervention for children with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006; 21: 57–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MR, Coelho C. Self-regulation after traumatic brain injury: A framework for intervention of memory and problem solving. Seminars in Speech & Language 2005; 26: 242–255
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kennedy MR, Coelho C, Turkstra L, Ylvisaker M, Sohlberg MM, Yorkston K, Chiou H-H, Kan P-F. Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2008; 18: 257–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall E, Shum D, Halson D, Bunning S, Teh M. The assesment of social problem-solving ability following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1997; 12: 68–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linscott R, Knight R, Godfrey H. The profile of functional impairment in communication (PFIC): A measure of communication impairment for clinical use. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 397–412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2008; 51: 225–239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney N, Chesnut RM, Maynard H, Mann N, Patterson P, Helfand M. Effect of cognitive rehabilitation on outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1999; 14: 277–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MR. Self-monitoring recall during two tasks after traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2004; 13: 142–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park NW, Ingles JL. Effectiveness of attention rehabilitation after an acquired brain injury: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychology 2001; 15: 199–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin HS, Culhane KA, Mendelsohn D, Lilly MA, Bruce D, Feletcher JM, Chapman S, Harward H, Eisenberg H. Cognition in relation to magnetic resonance imaging in head-injured children and adolescents. Archives of Neurology 1993; 50: 897–905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasotti L, Kovacs F, Eling PA, Brouwer WH. Time pressure management as a compensatory strategy training after closed head injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2000; 10: 47–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rath JF, Simon D, Langenbahn DM, Sherr RL, Diller L. Group treatment of problem-solving deficits in outpatients with traumatic brain injury: A randomised outcome study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2003; 13: 461–488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar