Use of assistive technology in cognitive rehabilitation: Exploratory studies of the opinions and expectations of healthcare professionals and potential users

References

• Khaw KT. Epidemiology of stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1996; 61: 333–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholte Op Reimer W. Long term care after stroke. Studies on care utilisation, quality of care and burden of caregiving. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• van Heugten C, Fasotti L. Revalidatie van cognitieve, emotionele en gedragsmatige gevolgen na verworven hersenletsel. Handboek Handicap en chronische ziekte. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004; aanvulling 87:37–56
   Google Scholar
• Sundet K, Finset A, Reinvang I. Neuropsychological predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1988; 10: 363–379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstenbach JB, den Otter R, Mulder TW. Cognitive recovery after stroke: A 2-year follow-up. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 1499–1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasquin SM, Verhey FR, Lousberg R, Winkens I, Lodder J. Vascular cognitive disorders: Memory, mental speed and cognitive flexibility after stroke. Journal of Neurological Sciences 2002; 203–204: 115–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Naalt J, van Zomeren AH, Sluiter WJ, Minderhoud JM. One year outcome in mild to moderate head injury: The predictive value of acute injury characteristics related to complaints and return to work. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1999; 66: 207–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel M, Coshall C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Natural history of cognitive impairment after stroke and factors associated with its recovery. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003; 17: 158–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholte op Reimer W, de Haan R, Rijnders P, Limburg M. The burden of caregiving in partners of long-term stroke survivors. Stroke 1998; 29: 6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser-Meily A, van Heugten C, Post M, Schepers V, Lindeman E. Intervention studies for caregivers of stroke survivors: A critical review. Patient Education and Counseling 2005; 56: 257–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry TAP, Wallace J, Kvarfordt C, Lynch KB. Personal digital assistants as cognitive aids for individuals with severe traumatic brain injury: A community-based trial. Brain Injury 2008; 22: 19–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depompei R, Gillette Y, Goetz E, Xenopoulos-Oddsson A, Bryen D, Dowds M. Practical applications for use of PDAs and smartphones with children and adolescents who have traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2008; 23: 487–499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Emslie H, Quirk K, Evans J, Watson P. A randomized control trial to evaluate a paging system for people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 891–894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch N, Shenton M, Spirl E, Simpson R, LoPresti E, Schreckenghost D. An assistive-technology intervention for verbose speech after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2004; 19: 366–377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MM, Connolly I. Roles of aided communication: Perspectives of adults who use AAC. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2008; 3: 260–273
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Fager S, Ball L, Dietz A. AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2007; 23: 230–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund SK, Light J. Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part III–contributing factors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2007; 23: 323–335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs B, Drew R, Ogletree BT, Pierce K. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) for adults with severe aphasia: Where we stand and how we can go further. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26: 1231–1240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch NL, Shenton M, Spirl E, Rowan J, Simpson R, Schreckenghost D, LoPresti EF. Web-based assistive technology interventions for cognitive impairments after traumatic brain injury: A selective review and two case studies. Rehabilitation Psychology 2004; 49: 200–212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Fickas S, Hung PF, Fortier A. A comparison of four prompt modes for route finding for community travellers with severe cognitive impairments. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 531–538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang YJ, Peng SM, Wang TY, Chen SF, Chen YR, Chen HC. Autonomous indoor wayfinding for individuals with cognitive impairments. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2010; 7: 45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, O'Neil-Pirozzi T, Morita C. Clinician expectations for portable electronic devices as cognitive-behavioural orthoses in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 401–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neil-Pirozzi TM, Kendrick H, Goldstein R, Glenn M. Clinician influences on use of portable electronic memory devices in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 179–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Buchhofer R, Vaccaro M. Portable electronic devices as memory and organizational aids after traumatic brain injury: A consumer survey study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2004; 19: 351–365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol R. Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. British Medical Journal 1997; 315: 418–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bie SE. Standaardvragen 1987: Voorstellen voor uniformering van vraagstellingen naar achtergrondkenmerken en interviews. Leiden: Stuurgroep Dataverzameling; 1987. VOI. 87.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers EM, Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003
   Google Scholar
• de Joode E, van Heugten C, Verhey F, van Boxtel M. Efficacy and usability of assistive technology for patients with cognitive deficits: A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation 2010; 24: 701–714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar