Correct information unit analysis for determining the characteristics of narrative discourse in individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury

References

• Coelho CA. Discourse analysis in traumatic brain injury. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury, S McDonald, L Togher, C Code. Psychology Press, East Sussex 1999; 55–79
   Google Scholar
• Hartley LL, Levin HS. Linguistic deficits after closed head injury: A current appraisal. Aphasiology 1990; 4: 353–370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe FJ, Murdoch BE, Chenery HJ. Towards a conceptualization of language and cognitive impairment in closed-head injury: Use of clinical measures. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 109–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan FM, Murdoch BE, Buttsworth DL. Closed-head-injured children's performance on narrative tasks. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 572–582
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Roueche JR, Fordyce DJ. Nonaphasic language disturbances after closed head injury. Language Sciences 1985; 7: 217–229
   Google Scholar
• Rousseaux M, Vérigneaux C, Kozlowski O. An analysis of communication in conversation after severe traumatic brain injury. European Journal of Neurology 2010; 17: 922–929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis GA, Coelho CA. Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after closed head injury. Brain and Language 2004; 89: 508–523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Body R, Perkins MR. Validation of linguistic analyses in narrative discourse after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 707–724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker FM, Hanlon RE. Effects of mild traumatic brain injury on narrative discourse production. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 783–792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman SB, Culhane KA, Levin HS, Harward H, Mendelsohn D, Ewing-Cobbs L, Fletcher JM, Bruce D. Narrative discourse after closed head injury in children and adolescents. Brain and Language 1992; 43: 42–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, Grela B, Corso M, Gamble A, Feinn R. Microlinguistic deficits in the narrative discourse of adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 1139–1145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley LL, Jensen PJ. Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury 1991; 5: 267–285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald S, Pearce S. The ‘dice’ game: A new test of pragmatic language skills after closed-head injury. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 255–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Discourse assessment following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study examining some demographic and methodological issues. Aphasiology 1995; 9: 365–380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Body R, Perkins M, McDonald S. Pragmatics, cognition, and communication in traumatic brain injury. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury, S McDonald, L Togher, C Code. Psychology Press, East Sussex 1999; 81–112
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich JS. Selective characteristics of narrative discourse in head-injured and normal adults. Journal of Communication Disorders 1988; 21: 1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough MS, Barrow I. Descriptive discourse abilities of traumatic brain-injured adults. Aphasiology 2003; 17: 183–191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan FM, Murdoch BE, Buttsworth DL. Closed-head-injured children's performance on narrative tasks. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 572–582
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King KA, Hough MS, Walker MM. Rastatter M, Holbert D. Mild traumatic brain injury: Effects on naming in word retrieval and discourse. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 725–732
   Google Scholar
• Biddle KR, McCabe A, Bliss L. Narrative skills following traumatic brain injury in children and adults. Journal of Communication Disorders 1996; 29: 447–469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galski T, Tompkins C, Johnston MV. Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 769–782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, Liles BZ, Duffy RJ. Impairment of discourse abilities and executive functions in traumatically brain-injured adults. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 471–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M. Communication outcome in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1993; 3: 367–387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youse KM, Coelho CA, Mozeiko JL, Feinn R. Discourse characteristics of closed-head-injured and non-brain-injured adults misclassified by discriminant function analysis. Aphasiology 2005; 19: 297–313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1993; 36: 338–350
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prins R, Bastiaanse R. Analysing the spontaneous speech of aphasic speakers. Aphasiology 2004; 18: 1075–1091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capilouto G, Wright HH, Wagovich SA. CIU and main event analyses of the structured discourse of older and younger adults. Journal of Communication Disorders 2005; 38: 431–444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honda R, Mitachi M, Watamori T. Production of discourse in high-function individuals with aphasia: With reference to performance on the Japanese CADL. Aphasiology 1999; 13: 475–493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nihon-Koujinou-Kinou-Syougai-Gakkai. Supplementary tests for Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA-ST) manual. Shinko-Igaku-Syuppansya, Tokyo 1999, (in Japanese)
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery (WAB). The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 1982
   Google Scholar
• Sugishita M. Japanese version of Western Aphasia Battery (WAB). Igaku-Syoin, Tokyo 1986, (in Japanese)
   Google Scholar
• Nelson HE, Willison JR. National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test manual2nd. NFER-Nelson, Windsor 1991
   Google Scholar
• Matsuoka K, Uno M, Kasai K, Koyama K, Kim Y. Estimation of premorbid IQ in individuals with Alzheimer's disease using Japanese ideographic script (Kanji) compound words; Japanese version of National Adult Reading Test. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2006; 60: 332–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised. Psychological Corporation, New York 1987
   Google Scholar
• Sugishita M. Japanese version of Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised (WMS-R). Nihon–Bunka-Kagaku-Sya, Tokyo 2001, (in Japanese)
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Alderman N, Burgess PW, Emslie H, Evans JJ. Behavioural assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. Thames Valley Test Company, St Edmunds 1996
   Google Scholar
• Kashima H, Mimura M, Tabuchi H, Moriyama Y, Kato M. Japanese version of behavioral assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. Shinko Igaku Syuppansya, Tokyo 2003, (in Japanese)
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey HPD, Knight RG, Marsh NV, Moroney B, Bishara SN. Social interaction and speed of information processing following very severe head-injury. Psychological Medicine 1989; 19: 175–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ríos M, Periáñez JA, Muñoz-Céspedes JM. Attentional control and slowness of information processing after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 257–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar