Exploration of a new tool for assessing emotional inferencing after traumatic brain injury

References

• Barrett LF, Mesquita B, Gendron M. Context in emotion perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2011;20:286–290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett LF, Lindquist KA, Gendron M. Language as context for the perception of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007;11:327–332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindquist KA, Gendron M. What’s in a Word? Language constructs emotion perception. Emotion Review 2013;5:66–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin I, McDonald S. Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain Language 2003;85:451–466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdonald S. Editorial Putting communication disorders in context after traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2000;14:339–347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkstra LS. Conversation-based assessment of social cognition in adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2008;22:397–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferstl EC, Rinck M, von Cramon DY. Emotional and temporal aspects of situation model processing during text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005;17:724–739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channon S, Watts M. Pragmatic language interpretation after closed head injury: Relationship to executive functioning. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 2003;8:243–260
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muller F, Simion A, Reviriego E, Galera C, Mazaux J, Barat M, Joseph P. Exploring theory of mind after severe traumatic brain injury. Cortex 2010;46:1088–1099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milders M, Ietswaart M, Crawford JR, Currie D. Social behavior following traumatic brain injury and its association with emotion recognition, understanding of intentions, and cognitive flexibility. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2008;14:318–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbage DR, Yim J, Zupan B, Neumann D, Tomita MR, Willer B. Meta-analysis of facial affect recognition difficulties after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 2011;25:277–285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupan B, Neumann D, Babbage DR, Willer B. The importance of vocal affect to bimodal processing of emotion: Implications for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Communication Disorders 2009;42:1–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radice-Neumann D, Zupan B, Babbage DR, Willer B. Overview of impaired facial affect recognition in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2007;21:807–816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ietswaart M, Milders M, Crawford JR, Currie D, Scott CL. Longitudinal aspects of emotion recognition in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2008;46:148–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Flanagan S, Rollins J, Kinch J. TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2003;18:219–238
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Saunders JC. Differential impairment in recognition of emotion across different media in people with severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2005;11:392–399
   Google Scholar
• Williams C, Wood RL. Impairment in the recognition of emotion across different media following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 2010;32:113–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S. Exploring the process of inference generation in sarcasm: A review of normal and clinical studies. Brain & Language 1999;68:486–506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird J, Parente R. Recognition of nonverbal communication of emotion after traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2014;34:39–43
   Google Scholar
• Zupan B, Babbage DR, Neumann D, Willer B. Recognition of facial and vocal affect following traumatic brian injury. Brain Injury 2014;28:1087–1095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Rodríguez JF, León-Carrión J. Theory of mind deficits in patients with acquired brain injury: A quantitative review. Neuropsychologia 2010;48:1181–1191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibby H, McDonald S. Theory of mind after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2005;43:99–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamay-Tsoory SG, Tomer R, Berger BD, Goldsher D, Aharon-Peretz J. Impaired “affective theory of mind” is associated with right ventromedial prefrontal damage. Cognitive & Behavioral Neurology 2005;18:55–67
   Google Scholar
• Stone VE, Baron-Cohen S, Knight RT. Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998;10:640–656
   Google Scholar
• Milders M, Ietswaart M, Crawford JR, Currie D. Impairments in theory of mind shortly after traumatic brain injury and at 1-year follow-up. Neuropsychology 2006;20:400–408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milders M, Fuchs S, Crawford JR. Neuropsychological impairments and changes in emotional and social behaviour following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 2003;25:157–172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Flanagan S, Martin I, Saunders C. The ecological validity of TASIT: A test of social perception. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2004;14:285–302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Bornhofen C, Shum D, Long E, Saunders C, Neulinger K. Reliability and validity of The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT): A clinical test of social perception. Disability & Rehabilitation 2006;28:1529–1542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S. New frontiers in neuropsychological assessment: Assessing social perception using a standardised instrument, The Awareness of Social Inference Test. Australian Psychology 2012;47:39–48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I. The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry 2001;42:241--251
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid J, Fishburne R, Rogers R, Chissom B. Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated readability index, fog count, and Flesch reading ease formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel. Millington, TN: Naval Technical Training, US Naval Air Station; 1975. p 8–75
   Google Scholar
• SuperLab. SuperLab Version 5. Sheriff Hutton York, UK: Psychology Software Distribution; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Neumann D, Babbage D, Zupan B, Willer B. A randomized controlled trial of emotion recognition training after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2014. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000054. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Biszak AM, Babbage DR. Facial affect recognition difficulties in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation services. Brain Injury 2014;28:97–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookshire RH, Nicholas LE. Discourse Comprehension Test. Tuscon, AZ: Communication Skills Builder, A division of the Psychological Corporation; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Nowicki S. The Manual for the Receptive Tests of the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy 2 (DANVA2). Albquerque, New Mexico: PICA Programs; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Spell LA, Frank E. Recognition of nonverbal communication of affect following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 2000;24:285–300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann D, Zupan B, Babbage DR, Radnovich AJ, Tomita M, Hammond F, Willer B. Affect recognition, empathy, and dysosmia after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2012;93:1414–1420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupan B, Neumann D. Affect Recognition in Traumatic Brain Injury: Responses to Unimodal and Multimodal Media. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2014;29:E1--E12
   Google Scholar
• Osterlind SJ. Constructing test items: Multiple-choice, constructed-response, performance, and other formats. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Downing SM. Statistics of testing. Assessment in health professions education. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009. p 93–118
   Google Scholar
• George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows Step by Step Reference, 11.0 Update. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Bond F, Godfrey HP. Conversation with traumatically brain-injured individuals: A controlled study of behavioral changes and their impact. Brain Injury 1997;11:319–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galski T, Tomkins C, Johnston MV. Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998;12:769–782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedictus MR, Spikman JM, van der Naalt J. Cognitive and behavioral impairment in traumatic brain injury related to outcome and return to work. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2010;91:1436–1441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croker V, McDonald S. Recognition of emotion from facial expression following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2005;19:787–799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins MJ, Dywan J, Segalowitz SJ. Altered electrodermal response to facial expression after closed head injury. Brain Injury 2002;16:245–257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson HF, Moffat NJ. Impaired emotional recognition following severe head injury. Cortex 1987;23:293–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucharska-Pietura K, Phillips ML, Gernand W, David AS. Perception of emotions from faces and voices following unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia 2003;41:1082–1090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dethier M, Blairy S, Rosenberg H, McDonald S. Emotional regulation impairments following severe traumatic brain injury: An investigation of the body and facial feedback effects. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2013;19:367–379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Pribram KH. Perception and memory of facial affect following brain injury. Perceptual & Motor Skills 1982;54:859–869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosip JC, Hall J A. Knowledge of nonverbal cues, gender, and nonverbal decoding accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 2004;28:267–286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett LF, Lane RD, Sechrest L, Schwartz GE. Sex differences in emotional awareness. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 2000;26:1027–1035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collignon O, Girard S, Gosselin F, Saint-Amour D, Lepore F, Lassonde M. Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men. Neuropsychologia 2010;48:220–225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green R. Deficits in facial emotion perception in adults with recent traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2004;42:133–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radice-Neumann D, Zupan B, Tomita M, Willer B. Training emotional processing in persons with brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2001;24:313–323
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella GJ. Assessment of attention following traumatic brain injury: A review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1998;8:351–375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss D, Gow AD. Frontal dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology & Behavioral Neurology 1992;5:272–282
   Google Scholar
• Spikman JM, Boelen DHE, Lamberts KF, Brouwer WH, Fasotti L. Effects of a multifaceted treatment program for executive dysfunction after acquired brain injury on indications of executive functioning in daily life. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2010;16:118–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar