Limited acquisition and generalisation of rhotics with ultrasound visual feedback in childhood apraxia

References

• Adams, S. G., & Page, A. D. (2000). Effects of selected practice and feedback variables on speech motor learning. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler-Bock, M., Bernhardt, B., Gick, B., & Bacsfalvi, P. (2007). The use of ultrasound in remediation of North American English /ɹ/ in 2 adolescents. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 128–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2007). Childhood apraxia of speech [Technical Report]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy.
   Google Scholar
• Bacsfalvi, P. (2010). Attaining the lingual components of /ɹ/ with ultrasound for three adolescents with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 34, 206–217.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, K. J., Maas, E., & Robin, D. A. (2007). Treating control of voicing in apraxia of speech with variable practice. Aphasiology, 21, 1195–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, K. J., & Robin, D. A. (2007). Influence of continual biofeedback on jaw pursuit-tracking in healthy adults and in adults with apraxia plus aphasia. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39, 19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A., McCabe, P., & McDonald, J. (2010). A treatment for dysprosody in childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1227–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., & Robey, R. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychology review, 16, 161–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weeninck, D. (2013). Praat v 5.3.49. Retrieved from www.praat.org.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F., Gick, B., Wilson, I., & Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. (2010). Spatial and temporal properties of gestures in North American English /r/. Language and Speech, 53, 49–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delattre, P., & Freeman, D. C. (1968). A dialect study of American r’s by X-ray motion picture. Linguistics, 6, 29–68.
   Google Scholar
• Dollaghan, C. A., & Campbell, T. F. (1998). Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1136–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4 ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, S. E., Maas, E., Caligiuri, M. P., Wulf, G., & Robin, D. A. (2007). Internal versus external: Oral-motor performance as a function of attentional focus. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froud, K., & Khamis-Dakwar, R. (2012). Mismatch negativity responses in children with a diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 302–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gick, B., Bacsfalvi, P., Bernhardt, B. M., Oh, S., Stolar, S., & Wilson, I. (2007). A motor differentiation model for liquid substitutions in children’s speech. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 1, 060003.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. (2000). Goldman Fristoe test of articulation (2 ed.). Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, F. H., Espy-Wilson, C. Y., Boyce, S. E., Matthies, M. L., Zandipour, M., & Perkell, J.S. (1999). Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 2854–2865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, E. R., & McAllister Byun, T. (2015). Enhancing generalisation in biofeedback intervention using the challenge point framework: A case study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29, 59–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, N. J., & Franks, I. M. (2001). Learning a coordination skill: Interactive effects of instruction and feedback. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 132–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iuzzini-Seigel, J., Hogan, T. P., Guarino, A. J., & Green, J. R. (in press). Reliance on auditory feedback in children with Childhood Apraxia of Speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 54, 32–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M. & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B. A., Freebairn, L. A., Hansen, A. J., Iyengar, S. K., & Taylor, H. G. (2004). School-age follow-up of children with childhood apraxia of speech. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 122–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisman, A. L., & Sadagopan, N. (2013). Focus of attention and speech motor performance. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46, 281–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., Butalla, C. E., & Farinella, K. A. (2012). Feedback frequency in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 239–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., & Farinella, K. A. (2012). Random versus blocked practise in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 561–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., Gildersleeve-Neumann, C. E., Jakielski, K. J., & Stoeckel, R. (2014). Motor-based intervention protocols in treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 1, 197–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Austermann Hula, S. N., Freedman, S. E., Wulf, G., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 277–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt, T. P., Jacks, A., & Davis, B. L. (2004). Token-to-token variability in developmental apraxia of speech: Three longitudinal case studies. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 18, 127–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister Byun, T., & Hitchcock, E.R. (2012). Investigating the use of traditional and spectral biofeedback approaches to intervention for /r/ misarticulation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 207–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister Byun, T., Hitchcock, E. R., & Swartz, M. T. (2014). Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: Evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 2116–2130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan, R. S., Nittrouer, S., & Manning, C. J. (2004). Development of /r/ in young, Midwestern, American children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 871–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, B. C., Gillon, G. T., & Dodd, B. (2009). Effectiveness of an integrated phonological awareness approach for children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 25, 341–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modha, G., Bernhardt, B., Church, R., & Bacsfalvi, P. (2008). Ultrasound in treatment of /r/: A case study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43, 323–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, K., Carlton, M., & Antoniou, A. (1990). The interaction of criterion and feedback information in learning a drawing task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 536–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. L., Brick, N., & Landi, N. (2013). Ultrasound biofeedback treatment for persisting childhood apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22, 627–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. L., & Edwards, M. L. (2007). Phonological processing skills of adolescents with residual speech sound errors. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 297–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. L., & Koenig, L. L. (2011). Phonetic variability in residual speech sound disorders: Exploration of subtypes. Topics in Language Disorders, 31, 168–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. L., & Leaman, M. (2014). Ultrasound visual feedback for acquired apraxia of speech: A case report. Aphasiology, 28, 278–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. L., McCabe, P., Rivera-Campos, A., Whittle, J. L., Landry, E., & Maas, E. (2014). Ultrasound visual feedback treatment and practise variability for residual speech sound errors. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 2102–2115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. L., Molfese, P. J., Gumkowski, N., Sorcinelli, A., Harwood, V., Irwin, J. R., & Landi, N. (2014). Neurophysiology of speech differences in childhood apraxia of speech. Developmental Neuropsychology, 39, 385–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rvachew, S. (1994). Speech perception training can facilitate sound production learning. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 37, 347–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rvachew, S., Nowak, M., & Cloutier, G. (2004). Effect of phonemic perception training on the speech production and phonological awareness skills of children with expressive phonological delay. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 250–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rvachew, S., Ohberg, A., & Savage, R. (2006). Young children’s responses to maximum performance tasks: Preliminary data and recommendations. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 30, 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Rvachew, S., Rafaat, S., & Martin, M. (1999). Stimulability, speech perception skills, and the treatment of phonological disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 33–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor control and learning: A behavioural emphasis (2nd ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Secord, W. A., Boyce, S. E., Donohue, J. S., Fox, R. A., & Shine, R. E. (2007). Eliciting sounds: Techniques and strategies for clinicians (2nd ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2003). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (4th ed.) San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D. (1975). A response evocation programme for /ɝ/. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 40, 92–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D. (2009). Childhood speech sound disorders: From postbehaviourism to the postgenomic era. In R. Paul & P. Flipsen (Eds.), Speech sound disorders in children (pp. 1–34). San Diego: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., Fourakis, M., Hall, S. D., Karlsson, H. B., Lohmeier, H. L., McSweeny, J. L., Potter, N. L., Scheer-Cohen, A. R., Strand, E. A., Tilkens, C. M., & Wilson, D. L. (2010). Extensions to the speech disorders classification system (SDCD). Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24, 795–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., & Kent, R. D. (2013). Clinical phonetics (4 ed.) Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, E. A., & Debertine, P. (2000). The efficacy of integral stimulation intervention with developmental apraxia of speech. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology, 8, 295–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., McDonald, S., Perdices, M., Togher, L., Schultz, R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18, 385–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terband, H., Maassen, B., Guenther, F. H., & Brumberg, J. (2009). Computational neural modeling of speech motor control in childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1595–1609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoonen, G., Maassen, B., Gabreëls, F., & Schreuder, R. (1999). Validity of maximum performance tasks to diagnose motor speech disorders in children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 13, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. R. (2013). Comprehensive test of phonological processing (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2011). Wechsler abbreviated scales of intelligence (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. T. (2007). Expressive vocabulary test (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & McNevin, N. (2003). Simply distracting learners is not enough: More evidence for the learning benefits of an external focus of attention. European Journal of Sport Science, 3, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar