Multiple phonetically trained-listener comparisons of speech before and after articulatory intervention in two children with repaired submucous cleft palate

References

• Alexander, K. (2015). Effectiveness of ultrasound visual biofeedback therapy (Unpublished honours project). Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Amorosa, H., von Benda, U., Wagner, E., & Keck, A. (1985). Transcribing phonetic detail in the speech of unintelligible children: A comparison of procedures. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 16(3), 281–287.
   Google Scholar
• Apple. (2012). The new iPad. Retrieved March 16, 2012, from http://store.apple.com/uk/browse/home/shop_ipad/family/ipad
   Google Scholar
• Articulate Instruments Ltd. (2013). Articulate Assistant Advanced User Guide: Version 2.14. Edinburgh, UK: Articulate Instruments Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bacsfalvi, P. (2010). Attaining the lingual components of /r/ with ultrasound for three adolescents with cochlear implants. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, 34, 206–217.
   Google Scholar
• Bacsfalvi, P., Bernhardt, B. M., & Gick, B. (2007). Electropalatography and ultrasound in vowel remediation for adolescents with hearing impairment. 4th international electropalatography (EPG) symposium, held in Edinburgh in September 2005. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 9, 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bacsfalvi, P., & Bernhardt, B. M. (2011). Long-term outcomes of speech therapy for seven adolescents with visual feedback technologies: Ultrasound and electropalatography. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25(11/12), 1034–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessell, A., Sell, D., Whiting, P., Roulstone, S., Albery, L., Persson, M., & Ness, A. R. (2013). Speech and language therapy interventions for children with cleft palate: A systematic review. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 50(1), e1–e17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2013). PRAAT doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.3.57. Retrieved March, 2014, from www.praat.org
   Google Scholar
• Bressmann, T., Radovanovic, B., Kulkarni, G. V., Klaiman, P., & Fisher, D. (2011). An ultrasonographic investigation of cleft-type compensatory articulations of voiceless velar stops. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25(11–12), 1028–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, L., Albery, L., Bowden, M., Harding-Bell, A., Phippen, G., & Sell, D. (2014). A cross-sectional cohort study of speech in five-year-olds with cleft palate +/- lip to support development of national audit standards. Benchmarking speech standards in the United Kingdom. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 51(4), 431–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnegard, K., & Lohmander, A. (2007). A cross-sectional study of speech in 10-year-old children with cleft palate: Results and issues of rater reliability. Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Journal, 44(1), 33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, H. W., & Yule, G. (1987). Phonemic false evaluation: Theoretical and clinical aspects. Clinical Linguistics, 1, 113–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, T. M., Halpin, P. F., & Szeredi, D. (2015). Online crowdsourcing for efficient rating of speech: A validation study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 53, 70–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland, J., Scobbie, J. M., Nakai, S., & Wrench, A. A. (2015). Helping children learn non-native articulations: The implications for ultrasound-based clinical intervention. In: The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 ( Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK: the University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Cleland, J., Scobbie, J. M., & Wrench, A. A. (2015). Using ultrasound visual biofeedback to treat persistent primary speech sound disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29(8–10), 575–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2014). Non-parametric statistics: A step-by-step approach (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cordes, A. K. (1994). The reliability of observational data: I. Theories and methods for speech-language pathology. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 37, 264–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, B., Hua, Z., Crosbie, S., Holm, A., & Ozanne, A. (2002). Diagnostic evaluation of articulation and phonology. London: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., Dunn, D. M., & National Foundation for Educational Research. (2009). British picture vocabulary scale (BPVSIII) (3rd ed.). Great Britain: Wascana Ltd partnership and GL Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon, F. E., & Wolters, M. (2005). A new application of ultrasound to image tongue behaviour in cleft palate speech. Poster presentation at the Craniofacial Society of Great Britain and Ireland Annual Scientific Conference, Swansea, UK, April 13–15, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon, F. E., & Wood, S. (2010). Visual feedback therapy with electropalatography (EPG) for speech sound disorders in children. In L. Williams, S. McLeod, & R. McCauley (Eds.), Interventions in speech sound disorders (pp. pp. 509–536). Baltimore: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Gooch, J. L., Hardin-Jones, M., Chapman, K. L., Trost-Cardamone, J. E., & Sussman, J. (2001). Reliability of listener transcriptions of compensatory articulations. Cleft Palate Journal, 38, 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, A., & Grunwell, P. (1998). Active versus passive cleft-type speech characteristics. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 33(3), 329–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehn, D., & Moller, K. T. (2000). Speech and Language issues in the cleft palate population: The state of the art. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 37, 348–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmander, A., & Olsson, M. (2004). Methodology for perceptual assessment of speech in patients with cleft palate: A critical review of the literature. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 41, 64–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister Byun, T., Hitchcock, E. R., & Swartz, M. T. (2014). Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: Evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 57(6), 2116–2130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. L., Brick, N., & Landi, N. (2013). Ultrasound biofeedback treatment for persisting childhood apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(4), 627–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. L., Ramsdell, H. L., Oller, D. K., Edwards, M. L., & Tobin, S. T. (2011). Developing a weighted measure of speech sound accuracy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimov, F., Jugessur, A., & Murray, J. C. (2012). Genetics of nonsyndromic orofacial clefts. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 49(1), 73–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, J., Raven, J. C, & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven’s progressive matrices and Raven’s coloured matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roxburgh, Z., Scobbie, J. M., & Cleland, J. (2015). Articulation therapy for children with cleft palate using visual articulatory models and ultrasound biofeedback. In: The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK: the University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. (2005). RCSLT clinical guidelines. Oxon: Speechmark Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ruscello, D., & Vallino, L. (2014). The application of motor learning concepts to the treatment of children with compensatory speech sound errors. SIG 5 Perspectives on Speech Science and Orofacial Disorders, 24(2), 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, D. (2005). Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: A review. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40(2), 103–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2006). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (4th ed.). London: Pearson Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., Austin, D., Lewis, B. A., McSweeny, J. L., & Wilson, D. L. (1997). The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metric: Extensions and reliability data. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 708–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., & Lof, G. L. (1991). Reliability studies in broad and narrow phonetic transcription. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 1, 171–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smarty Ears. (2011). Speech trainer 3D. Retrieved November, 2011, from http://smartyearsapps.com
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. (2015). Intelligibility pre/post therapy in children with cleft lip and palate (Unpublished honours project). Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Trost, J. E. (1981). Articulatory additions to the classical description of the speech of persons with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Journal, 18, 193–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vallino-Napoli, L. (2011). Evaluation and Evidence-Based Practice. In S. Howard & A. Lohmander (Eds.), Cleft palate speech: Assessment and intervention (pp. 317–358). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Young, E. (2015). The effectiveness of ultrasound visual biofeedback in the remediation of an idiosyncratic case of alveolar backing (Unpublished master’s thesis). Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Zharkova, N. (2013). Using ultrasound to quantify tongue shape and movement characteristics. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 50, 76–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, W., & Zierdt, A. (2008). Telediagnostic assessment of intelligibility in dysarthria: A pilot investigation of MVP-online. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41, 553–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar