Bringing conversations to a close: The management of closings in interactions between AAC users and ‘natural’ speakers

References

• Alm N., Todman J., Elder L., Newell A. F. Computer-aided conversation for severely physically impaired non-speaking people. Interchi '93 1993; 236–241, 24–29 April
   Google Scholar
• Aston G. Say ‘thank you’: some pragmatic constraints in conversational closings. Applied Linguistics 1995; 16: 57–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. M. Atkinson, J. Heritage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984
   Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig K., Hartford B., Mahan-Taylor R., Morgan M., Reynolds D. Developing pragmatic awareness: closing the conversation. English Language Teaching Journal 1991; 45: 4–15
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman D. R., Mirenda P. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Paul Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1992
   Google Scholar
• Button G. On varieties of closings. Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 3: Discourse and Dialogue, T. A. van Dijk. Academic Press, London 1985
   Google Scholar
• Button G. Moving out of closings. Talk and Social Organisation, G. Button, J. R. E. Lee. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, PA 1987
   Google Scholar
• Buzolich M. J., Weimann J. M. Turntaking in atypical conversations: the case of the speaker/augmented communicator dyad. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1988; 31: 3–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calculator S., Dollaghan C. The use of communication boards in a residential setting: an evaluation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1982; 47: 281–287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cerebral Palsy Today. The experts respond: are cognitive impairments associated with cerebral palsy?. 1991; 1: 7
   Google Scholar
• Clayman S. The production of punctuality: social interaction, temporal organisation, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology 1989; 95: 659–691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins S., Murphy J. The development of news-tellings in conversations between AAC users and ‘natural’ speakers. Communication Matters 1994; 8: 20–24
   Google Scholar
• Collins S., Markova I., Murphy J. Interactive Strategies of Users of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) Systems and their Partners. Final Report to the Disability Research Committee, Scottish Office Home and Health Department, Edinburgh, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Dornyei Z., Thurrell S. Teaching conversational skills intensively: course content and rationale. English Language Teaching Journal 1994; 48: 40–49
   Google Scholar
• Talk at Work, P. Drew, J. Heritage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992
   Google Scholar
• Harris D. Communicative interaction processes involving nonvocal physically handicapped children. Topics in Language Disorders 1982; 2: 21–37
   Google Scholar
• Hartford B. S., Bardovi-Harlig K. Closing the conversation: evidence from the academic advising session. Discourse Processes 1992; 15: 93–116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath C. Taking leave of the doctor. Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction, C. Heath. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1986
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J., Bedrosian J. Subject selection in AAC research: decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1995; 11: 11–13
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J., Mathy-Laikko P., Yoder D. E. Studying conversations of augmentative communication system users. The Vocally Impaired: Clinical Practice and Research, L. E. Bernstein. Grune & Stratton, Philadelphia, PA 1988
   Google Scholar
• Kratt A. Communication Interaction between Aided and Natural Speakers. Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled, Toronto 1985, Report
   Google Scholar
• Lesser R., Milroy L. Linguistics and Aphasia: psycholinguistic and pragmatic aspects of intervention. Longman, London 1993
   Google Scholar
• Levinson S. L. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1983
   Google Scholar
• Light J. Interaction involving individuals using AAC systems: state of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1988; 4: 66–82
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Collier B., Parnes P. Communicative interaction between young non-speaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part 1: Discourse patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1985; 2: 74–83
   Google Scholar
• Murphy J., Marková I., Moodie E., Scott J., Boa S. Augmentative and alternative communication systems used by people with cerebral palsy in Scotland: demographic survey. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1995; 11: 26–36
   Google Scholar
• Murphy J., Marková I., Collins S., Moodie E. AAC systems: obstacles to effective use. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 1996; 31: 31–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newell A., Alm N., Arnott J. The use of models of human communication patterns within a prosthesis for non-speaking people. Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications 1991; 27: 225–231
   Google Scholar
• Ochs E. Transcription as theory. Developmental Pragmatics, E. Ochs, B. Schieffelin. Academic Press, New York 1979
   Google Scholar
• Psathas G. Conversation Analysis: the study of talk-in-interaction. Qualitative Research Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California 1995; vol. 35
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff E., Sacks H. Opening up closings. Semiotica 1973; 8: 289–372
   Google Scholar
• Smith M. M. Speech by any other name: the role of communication aids in interaction. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 1994; 29: 225–240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ten Have P. Talk and institution: a reconsideration of the ‘asymmetry’ of doctor-patient information. Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conservation Analysis, D. Boden, D. H. Zimmerman. Polity Press, Cambridge 1991
   Google Scholar