Adolescents with traumatic brain injury: Assessing pragmatic language function

References

• Basso A., Scarpa M. T. Traumatic aphasia in children and adults: a comparison of clinical features and evolution. Cortex 1990; 26: 502–514
   Google Scholar
• Bond M. R. Assessment of the psychosocial outcome after severe head injury. Outcome of Severe Damage to the CNS: Ciba Foundation Symposium 34 (new series), R. Porter, D. W. Fitzsimmons. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1975
   Google Scholar
• Bond M. R. Assessment of the psychosocial outcome of severe head injury. Acta Neurochirurgica 1976; 34: 57–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown P., Levinson S. C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987
   Google Scholar
• Burke W., Wesolowski M., Buyer D., Zawlocki R. J. The rehabilitation of adolescents with traumatic brain injury: outcome and follow up. Brain Injury 1990; 4: 371–378
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chapman S. B., Culhane K. A., Levin H. S., Harward H., Mendelsohn D., Ewing-Cobbs L., Fletcher J. M., Bruce D. Narrative discourse after closed head injury in children and adolescents. Brain and Language 1992; 43: 42–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark H. H. Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology 1979; 11: 430–477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark H. H., Lucy P. Understanding what is meant from what is said: a study in conversationally conveyed requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 1975; 14: 56–72
   Google Scholar
• Clark H. H., Schunk D. H. Polite responses to polite requests. Cognition 1980; 8: 111–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho C. A., Liles B. Z., Duffy R. J. Impairments of discourse abilities and executive functions in traumatically brain injured adults. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 471–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton A. V. Behavioural change strategies for children and adolescents with severe brain injury. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1987; 20: 581–589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich J. S. Selective characteristics of narrative discourse in head-injured and normal adults. Journal of Communication Disorders 1988; 21: 1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayol M., Lemaire P. Levels of approach to discourse. Narrative Discourse in Neurologically Impaired and Normal Aging Adults, H. H. Brownell, Y. Joanette. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA 1993
   Google Scholar
• Franick E. P., Clark H. H. How to make requests that overcome obstacles to compliance. Journal of Memory and Language 1985; 24: 560–568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon D., Lakoff G. Conversational postulates. Syntax and Semantics: Speech acts, P. Cole, J. L. Morgan. Academic Press, New York 1975; Vol. 3
   Google Scholar
• Hagan C. Language disorders in head trauma. Language Disorders in Adults, A. Holland. College-Hill, San Diego, CA 1984
   Google Scholar
• Hartley L. L., Jenson P. J. Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury 1991; 5: 267–285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartley L. L., Jenson P. J. Three discourse profiles of closed-head-injured speakers: theoretical and clinical implications. Brain Injury 1992; 6: 271–382
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasan R. The texture of a text. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective, M. A. K. Halliday, R. Hasan. Deakin University Press, Victoria 1985
   Google Scholar
• Haverkate H. A speech act analysis of irony. Journal of Pragmatics 1990; 14: 77–109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman K. M., Safran A., Geshwind N. Closed head trauma and aphasia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1971; 34: 265–269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan F. M., Murdoch B. E., Buttsworth D. L. Closed head injured children's performance on narrative tasks. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 572–582
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalsbeek W. D., McLaurin R. L., Harris B. S. H., Miller J. D. The national head and spine cord injury survey: major findings. Journal of Neurosurgery Supplement 1980; 53: S19–S31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus J. F., Black M. A., Hessol N., Ley P., Rokaw W., Sullivan C., Bowers S., Knowlton S., Marshall L. The incidence of acute brain injury and serious impairment in a defined population. American Journal of Epidemiology 1984; 119: 186–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson S. C. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Sydney 1983
   Google Scholar
• Liles B. Z., Coelho C. A., Duffy R. J., Zalagens M. R. Effects of elicitation procedures on the narratives of normal and closed head injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1989; 54: 356–366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald S. Differential pragmatic language loss following closed head injury: Ability to comprehend conversational implicature. Applied Psycholinguistics 1992; 13: 295–312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S. Pragmatic language loss following closed head injury: inability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain and Language 1993; 44: 28–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S., Pearce S. The Dice Game: a new test of organisational skills in language. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 255–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S., Pearce S. Clinical insights into pragmatic language theory: the case of sarcasm. Brain and Language 1996; 53: 81–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S., Pearce S. Requests that overcome listener reluctance: impairment associated with executive dysfunction in brain injury. Brain and Language. 1997, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S., van Sommers P. Differential pragmatic language loss following closed head injury: ability to negotiate requests. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1993; 10: 297–315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentis M., Prutting C. A. Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1987; 30: 88–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milton S. B., Wertz R. T. Management of persisting communication deficits in patients with traumatic brain injury. Clinical Neuropsychology of Intervention, B. P. Uzzell, Y. Gross. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, MA 1986
   Google Scholar
• Milton S. B., Prutting C. A., Binder G. M. Appraisal of communication in head injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1984; 30: 88–98
   Google Scholar
• Muuss R. E. Theories of Adolescence, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York 1996
   Google Scholar
• Nippold M. A. Developmental markers in adolescent language: Syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools 1993; 24: 21–28
   Google Scholar
• Nippold M. A., Cuyler J. S., Braunbeck-Price R. Explanation of ambiguous advertisements: A developmental study with children and adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1988; 31: 466–474
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patry R., Nespoulous J-L. Discourse analysis in linguistics: historical and theoretical background. Discourse Ability and Brain Damage: Theoretical and empirical perspectives, Y. Joanette, H. H. Brownell. Springer-Verlag, New York 1990
   Google Scholar
• Pearce S., McDonald S., Coltheart M. Ability to process ambiguous advertisements after frontal lobe damage, in preparation
   Google Scholar
• Phelps-Terasaki D., Phelps-Gunn T. The Test of Pragmatic Language. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 1992
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano G. P., Roueche J. R., Fordyce D. J. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation after Brain Injury. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD 1986
   Google Scholar
• Sarno M. T. The nature of verbal impairment after closed head injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 1980; 168: 685–692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarno M. T. Verbal impairment after closed head injury: report of a replication study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 1984; 172: 475–479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarno M. T. Head injury: language and speech defects. Scandanavian Journal of Rehabilitation (Medical Supplement) 1988; 17: 55–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarno M. T., Buonaguo A., Levita E. Characteristics of verbal impairment in closed head injury patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1986; 67: 400–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle J. R. Indirect speech acts. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, P. Cole, J. L. Morgan. Academic Press, New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• Selecki B. R., Ring I. T., Simpson D. A., Vanderfield G. K., Sewell M. F. Injuries to the Head, Spine and Peripheral Nerves. Health Commission of New South Wales, Sydney 1981
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg L., Levine A. You and Your Adolescent. Harper Collins, New York 1990
   Google Scholar
• Strong C. J., Saver J. P. Stability of cohesion in the spoken narratives of language impaired and normally developing school-aged children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 95–111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tate R. L. (1991) Impairments after severe blunt head injury: Their consequences for rehabilitation and psychosocial reintegration. Brain Impairment: Advances in applied research. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment. 1991, W. R. Levick, B. G. Frost, M. Watson, H. P. Pfister. University of Newcastle, Newcastle
   Google Scholar
• Tate R. L., Broe G. A., Lulham J. M. Impairment after severe head injury: The results from a consecutive series of 100 patients. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1989; 79: 97–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate R. L., McDonald S., Lulham J. L. Traumatic brain injury: severity of injury and outcome in an Australian community, in preparation
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen I. V. Evaluation and outcome of aphasia in patients with severe closed head trauma. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1975; 38: 713–718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkstra L., McDonald S., Kaufman P. Assessment of pragmatic communication skills in adolescents after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1995; 10: 329–345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanleer E., Turkstra L. Effect of elicitation procedure on discourse coherence and cohesion in brain-injured adolescents, in preparation
   Google Scholar
• Walsh K. W. Neuropsychology: A clinical approach. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 1987
   Google Scholar
• Wiig E. H., Secord W. Test of Language Competence-Expanded. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 1988
   Google Scholar