Home Modification Assessments: Clinical Utility and Treatment Context

REFERENCES

• American Association of Retired Persons. (2000). Fixing to stay: A national survey on housing and home modification issues. Retrieved October 22, 2008, from http://www.aarp.org/research/reference/publicopinions/aresearch-import-783.html.
   Google Scholar
• Anemaet, W.K. & Moffa-Trotter, M.E. (1999). Promoting safety and function through home assessments. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 15(1), 26–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auriemma, D., Faust, S., Sibrian, K. & Jimenez, J. (1999). Home modifications for the elderly: Implications for the occupational therapist. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 16(3/4), 135–144.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005). Economic news release: Work at home summary. Retrieved May 4, 2009, from http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos078.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). Occupational outlook handbook, 2008–09 edition: Occupational therapists. Retrieved March 13, 2009, from http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos078.htm
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, J.M., Duncan, P.W., Weiner, D.K. & Studenski, S.A. (2001). Special feature: The home assessment profile –a reliable and valid assessment tool. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 16(3), 77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, T. & Oliver, R. (2006). Factor analysis and construct validity of the SAFER-HOME. OTJR: Occupation, Participation & Health, 26(4), 132–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, T., Oliver, R., Ascott, P., Ch’un Choo, L., Davis, V., Gay, A., et al. (2006). The safety assessment of function and the environment for rehabilitation –Health outcome measure and evaluation (SAFER-HOME) v.3. Toronto, Canada: COTA Health.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, W., Brown, C. & McGuigan, A. (1994). The ecology of human performance: A framework for considering the effect of context. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(7), 595–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Extended Home Living Services. (2002). Comprehensive assessment and solution process for aging residents (CASPAR). Wheeling, IL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fange, A. & Iwarsson, S. (1999). Physical housing environment: Development of a self-assessment instrument. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(5), 250–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fange, A. & Iwarsson, S. (2007). Challenges in the development of strategies for housing adaptation evaluations. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 14(3), 140–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher, G.S., Baker, A., Koval, D., Lishok, C. & Maisto, E. (2007). A field test of the Cougar Home Safety Assessment (version 2.0) in the homes of older persons living alone. The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54(2), 124–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, G.S., Civitella, H. & Perez, V. (2006). The cougar home safety assessment: Version 4.0. Dallas, PA: College Misericordia.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, G.S., Coolbaugh, K. & Rohes, C. (2006). A field test of the Cougar Home Safety Assessment for older persons, Version 1.0. California Journal of Health Promotion, 4(2), 181–196.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, L.N. (2003). Conducting research on home environments: Lessons learned and new directions. The Gerontologist, 43(5), 628–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin, L.N., Mann, W., Tomit, M. & Marcus, S.M. (2001). Factors associated with home environmental problems among community-living older people. Disability & Rehabilitation, 23(17), 777–787. doi: 10.1080/09638280110062167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin, L.N., Schinfeld, S., Winter, L., Corcoran, M., Boyce, A.A. & Hauck, W. (2002). Evaluating home environments of persons with dementia: Interrater reliability and validity of the home environmental assessment protocol (HEAP). Disability & Rehabilitation, 24(1), 59–71. doi: 10.1080/09638280110066325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golant, S.M. (2003). Conceptualizing time and behavior in environmental gerontology: A pair of old issues deserving new thought. The Gerontologist, 43(5), 638–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood, F. (2004). Understanding needs: A starting point for quality. Housing Studies, 19(5), 709–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwarsson, S. (1999). The housing enabler: An objective tool for assessing accessibility. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(11), 491–497.
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson, S., Nygren, C. & Slaug, B. (2005). Cross-national and multi-professional inter-rater reliability of the housing enabler. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 12(1), 29–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klein, S.I., Rosage, L. & Shaw, G. (1999). The role of occupational therapists in home modification programs in an area agency on aging. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 16(3/4), 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Niva, B. & Skar, L. (2006). A pilot study of the activity patterns of five elderly persons after a housing adaptation. Occupational Therapy International, 13(1), 21–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petersson, I., Fisher, A.G., Hemmingsson, H. & Lilja, M. (2007). The client-clinician assessment protocol (C-CAP): Evaluation of its psychometric properties for use with people aging with disabilities in need of home modifications. OTJR: Occupation, Participation & Health, 27(4), 140–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pynoos, J., Sanford, J. & Rosenfelt, T. (2002). A team approach for home modifications. OT Practice, 7(7), 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, J.A., Pynoos, J.P., Tejral, A. & Browne, A. (2002). Development of a comprehensive assessment for delivery of home modifications. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 20(2), 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Tickle-Degnen, L. (2000). Evidence-based practice forum: What is the best evidence to use in practice? The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(2), 218–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar