A Novel Thermodynamic Treatment for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

REFERENCES

• Foulks GN, Bron AJ. Meibomian gland dysfunction: A clinical scheme for description, diagnosis, classification, and grading. Ocul Surf. 2003;1:107–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bron AJ, Tiffany JM. The contribution of meibomian disease to dry eye. Ocul Surf. 2004;2:149–165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joffre C, Souchier M, Gregoire S, et al. Differences in meibomian fatty acid composition in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction and aqueous-deficient dry eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:116–119.
   Google Scholar
• Lemp MA, Baudouin C, Baum J, et al. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: Report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of The International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5:75–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goto E, Monden Y, Takano Y, et al. Treatment of non-inflamed obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction by an infrared warm compression device. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:1403–1407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) Communication: September 8 newsletter 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lemp MA, Bardfield L, Blackie CA, et al. Evaluation of a novel method of treatment of dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 127/A154.
   Google Scholar
• Korb DR, Blackie CA. Restoration of meibomian gland functionality with novel thermodynamic treatment device—A case report. Cornea. 2010 Aug;29(8):930–3.
   Google Scholar
• Maskin S. Intraductal meibomian gland probing relieves symptoms of obstructive MGD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 4636/D880.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman HL, Preston KL. Heat retention in varieties of warm compresses: A comparison between warm soaks, hard-boiled eggs and the re-heater. Ophthalmic Surg. 1989;20:846–848.
   Google Scholar
• Blackie CA, Solomon JD, Greiner JV, et al. Inner eyelid surface temperature as a function of warm compress methodology. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:675–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori A, Oguchi Y, Goto E, et al. Efficacy and safety of infrared warming of the eyelids. Cornea. 1999;18:188–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori A, Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, et al. Disposable eyelid-warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2003;47:578–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, Goto E, et al. Efficacy of a new warm moist air device on tear functions of patients with simple meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2006;25:644–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despa F, Orgill DP, Neuwalder J, et al. The relative thermal stability of tissue macromolecules and cellular structure in burn injury. Burns. 2005;31:568–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang HW, Shih TC, Liauh CT. Predicting effects of blood flow rate and size of vessels in a vasculature on hyperthermia treatments using computer simulation. Biomed Eng Online. 2010;9:18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bron AJ, Tiffany JM, Gouveia SM, et al. Functional aspects of the tear film lipid layer. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:347–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naoumidi TL, Pallikaris IG, Naoumidi II, et al. Conductive keratoplasty: Histological study of human corneas. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:984–992.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sporl E, Genth U, Schmalfuss K, et al. Thermomechanical behavior of the cornea. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1996;5:322–327.
   Google Scholar
• Kenshalo DR. Comparison of thermal sensitivity of the forehead, lip, conjunctiva and cornea. J Appl Physiol. 1960;15:987–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldblatt WS, Finger PT, Perry HD, et al. Hyperthermic treatment of rabbit corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30:1778–1783.
   Google Scholar
• Bollemeijer JG, Ladendijk JJ, Best JA, et al. Effects of microwave-induced hyperthermia on the anterior segment of healthy rabbit eyes. Grafes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1989;227:271–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan H, Teng SW, Lo W, et al. Characterizing the thermally induced structural changes to intact porcine eye, Part 1: Second harmonic generation imaging of cornea stroma. J Biomed Opt. 2005;10:054019-1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kampmeier J, Radt B, Birngruber R, et al. Thermal and biomechanical parameters of porcine cornea. Cornea. 2000;19:355–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharon N, Bar-Yoseph PZ, Bormusov E, et al. Simulation of heat exposure and damage to the eye lens in a neighborhood bakery. Exp Eye Res. 2008;87:49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kramar P, Harris C, Guy AW. Thermal cataract formation in rabbits. Bioelectromagnetics. 1987;8:397–406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korb DR, Herman JP, Greiner JV, et al. Lid wiper epitheliopathy and dry eye symptoms. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31:2–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korb DR, Blackie CA. Meibomian gland diagnostic expressibility: Correlation with dry eye symptoms and gland location. Cornea. 2008;27:1142–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, et al. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:615–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrota KM. The Meibomian Mastrota paddle [Cynacon/Ocusoft website]. Available from http://www.ocusoft.com/news_briefs/art_1_11_06.htm. Accessed February 16, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Korb DR, Blackie CA. Diagnostic vs. therapeutic meibomian gland expression. J Am Acad Optom—Supp: Optom Vis Sci. 2009; Program number 90745.
   Google Scholar