Effect of Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin on the Ocular Bioavailability of Dexamethasone from a pH-Induced Mucoadhesive Hydrogel

REFERENCES

• Lee VHL, Robinson JR. Mechanistic and quantitative evaluation of precorneal pilocarpine disposition in albino rabbits. J Pharm Sci. 1979;68:673–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H, Sung KC. Carbopol/pluronic phase change solutions for ophthalmic drug delivery. J Control Release. 2000;69:379–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee VHL, Robinson JR. Topical ocular drug delivery: Recent developments and future challenges. J Ocul Pharmacol. 1986;2:67–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee VHL. New directions in the optimization of ocular drug delivery. J Ocul Pharmacol. 1999;6:157–164.
   Google Scholar
• Ganguly S, Dash AK. A novel in situ gel for sustained drug delivery and targeting. Int J Pharm. 2004;276:83–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingham RB, Berry M, Stevenson D, Cortleld AP. Secreted human conjunctival mucus contains MUC5AC glycoforms. Glycobiology. 1999;9:1181–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Robinson JR. Mechanisms of mucoadhesion of poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels. Pharm Res. 1987;4:457–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szejtli J. Introduction and general overview of cyclodextrin chemistry. Chem Rev. 1998;98:1743–1753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftsson T, Stefansson E. Cyclodextrins in eye drop formulations: Enhanced topical delivery of corticosteroids to the eye. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80:144–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu C, Qi H, Chen W, Huang C, Su C, Li W, Hou S. Preparation and evaluation of a carbopol/HPMC based in situ gelling ophthalmic system for puerarin. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2007;127:183–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies NM, Farr SJ, Hadgraft J, Kellaway IW. Evaluation of mucoadhesive polymers in ocular drug delivery. I. Viscous solutions. Pharm Res. 1991;8:1039–1043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig A. The use of mucoadhesive polymers in ocular drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:1595–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bourlais C, Acar L, Zia H, Sado PA, Needham T, Leverge R. Ophthalmic drug delivery systems− Recent advances. Prog Retinal Eye Res. 1998;17:33–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerami A, Beutler B. The role of cachectin/TNF in endotoxic shock and cachexia. Immunol Today. 1988;9:28–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li Q, Peng B, Whitcup SM, Jang SU, Chan CC. Endotoxin induced uveitis in the mouse: susceptibility and genetic control. Exp Eye Res. 1995;61:629–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta SK, Agarwal R, Srivastava S, Agarwal P, Agrawal SS, Saxena R, Galpalli N. The anti-inflammatory effects of Curcuma longa and Berberis aristata in endotoxin-induced uveitis in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4036–4040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz-Fernandez S, Martin-Mola E. Uveitis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20:487–505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristinsson JK, Fridriksdottir H, Thorisdottir S, Sigurdardottir AM, Stefansson E, Loftsson T. Dexamethasone-cyclodextrin-polymer co-complexes in aqueous eye drops− Aqueous humor pharmacokinetics in humans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;7:1199–1203.
   Google Scholar
• Leibowitz HM, Kupferman A. Bioavailability and therapeutic effectiveness of topically administered corticosteroids. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otol. 1975;79:78–88.
   Google Scholar
• Loftsson T, Brewster ME, Derendorf H, Bodor N. 2- hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin: Properties and usage in pharmaceutical formulations. Pharm Ztg Wisw. 1991;136:5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Loftsson T, Olafsdottir BJ, Bodor N. The effects of cyclodextrin on transdermal delivery of drugs. Eur J Pharmacol Biopharmacol. 1991;37:30–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi T, Lach JL. Investigation of some complexes formed in solution by caffeine: IV. Interactions between caffeine and sulfathiazole, sulfadiazine, p-aminobenzoic acid, benzocaine, phenobarbital, and barbital. J Am Pharm Assoc Sci Ed. 1954;43:349–354.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan EE, Gallo JM. A simple rheological method for the in vitro assessment of mucin-polymer bioadhesive bond strength. Pharm Res. 1990;7:491–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesavan K, Nath G, Pandit JK. Sodium alginate based mucoadhesive system for gatifloxacin and its in vitro antibacterial activity. Sci Pharm. 2010;78:941–957.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibaldi M, Feldman S. Establishment of sink conditions in dissolution rate determinations. Theoretical considerations and application to non-disintegrating dosage forms. J Pharm Sci. 1967;56:1238–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner JG. Interpretation of percent dissolved-time plots derived from in vitro testing of conventional tablets and capsules. J Pharm Sci. 1969;58:1253–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained action medication: Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci. 1963;52:1145–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker EM, Buri P, Peppas NA. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm. 1983;15:25–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppas NA. Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release polymers. Pharm Acta Helv. 1985;60:110–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruiz-Moreno JM, Thillaye B, de Kozak Y. Retino-choroidal changes in endotoxin-induced uveitis in the rat. Ophthalmic Res. 1992;24:162–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi T, Kristiansen H. Binding specificity between small organic solutes in aqueous solution: Classification of some solutes into two groups according to binding tendencies. J Pharm Sci. 1970;59:1601–1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo JA, Palomo-Canales J, Garcia JJ. Preparation and characterization of albendazole b-cyclodextrin complexes. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1999;25:1241–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftsson T, Friðriksdottir H, Thorisdottir S, Stefansson E. The effect of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose on release of dexamethasone from aqueous 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin formulations. Int J Pharm. 1994;104:181–184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ooteghem MM., In Edman P, ed. Biopharmaceutics of Ocular Drug Delivery. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1993: 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bothner H, Waaler T, Wik O. Rheological characterization of tear substitutes. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1990;16:755–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu J, Robinson JR, Leung S. Binding of acrylic polymers to mucin/epithelial surfaces: structure property-relationships. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1988; 5:21–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohdanecky M, Kvar J., In Jenkins AD, ed. Viscosity of Polymer Solution, Polymer Science Library 2, Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific;1982.
   Google Scholar
• Peppas NA, Buri PA. Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of bioadhesion on soft tissues. J Control Release. 1985;2:257–275.
   Google Scholar