How does the thought of cancer arise in a general practice consultation? Interviews with GPs

References

• Hamilton W. Cancer diagnosis in primary care. Brit J Gen Pract 2010;60:121–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtedahl KA. Diagnosis of cancer in general practice. Thesis, University of Tromsø, Institute of Community Medicine; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Jones R, Latinovic R, Charlton J, Gulliford MC. Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: Cohort study using General Practice Research Database. BMJ 2007;334:1040–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton W. Five misconceptions in cancer diagnosis. Brit J Gen Pract 2009;59:441–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylenna M. Fear of cancer among patients in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 1984;2:24–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McWhinney IR. Problem solving and decision-making in primary care medical practice. Can Fam Physician 1972;18: 109–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Style A. Intuition and problem solving. J R Coll Gen Pract 1979;29:71–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heneghan C, Glasziou P, Thompson M, Rose P, Balla J, Lasserson D, . Diagnostic strategies used in primary care. BMJ 2009;338:1003–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G, Young M, Brooks L. Non-analytical models of clinical reasoning: The role of experience. Med Educ 2007;41: 1140–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André M, Borgquist L, Foldevi M, Mölstad S. Asking for “rules of thumb”: A way to discover tacit knowledge in general practice. Fam Pract 2002;19:617–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery K. How doctors think: Clinical judgement and the practice of medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyvenhoven MM, Spreeuwenberg C, Touw-Otten FWMM. Diagnostic styles of general practitioners confronted with ambiguous symptoms: An exploratory study. Scand J Prim Health Care 1989;7:43–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polanyi M. “Creative imagination” and “the body–mind relation”. In: Allen RT, editor. Society, economics & philosophy: Selected papers. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Rudebeck CE. Imagination and empathy in the consultation. Br J Gen Pract 2002; 52:450–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha SR. Reconsidering Michael Polanyi's philosophy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter KM. Doctors’ Stories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Marton F, Booth S. The idea of phenomenography. In: Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard A, McCosker H, Gerber R. Phenomenography: A qualitative research approach for exploring understanding in health care. Qual Health Res 1999;9:212–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton F. Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. In: Sherman RR, Webb RB, editors. Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods. London: Falmer Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen M-L, Holtedahl KA, Rudebeck CE. A doctor close at hand: How GPs view their role in cancer care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2010;28:249–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torring ML, Frydenberg M, Hansen RP, Olesen F, Hamilton W, Vedsted P. Time to diagnosis and mortality in colorectal cancer: A cohort study in primary care. Br J Cancer 2011;104:934–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nortvedt P. Sensibility and clinical understanding. Med Health Care Philos 2008;11:209–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall JA. Clinicians’ accuracy in perceiving patients: Its relevance for clinical practice and a narrative review of methods and correlates. Patient Educ Couns 2011;84:319–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siminoff LA, Rogers HL, Thomson MD, Dumenci L, Harris-Haywood S. Doctor, what's wrong with me? Factors that delay the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2011;84:352–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hjortdahl P. The influence of general practitioners’ knowledge about their patients on the clinical decision-making process. Scand J Prim Health Care 1992;10:290–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen R, Vedsted P, Sokolowski I, Sondergaard J, Olesen F. General practitioner characteristics and delay in cancer diagnosis: A population-based cohort study. BMC Fam Pract 2011;12:100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stolper E, van Bokhoven M, Houben P, van Royen P, van de Wiel M, van der Weijden T, . The diagnostic role of gut feelings in general practice: A focus group study of the concept and its determinants. BMC Fam Pract 2009;10:17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plessner H, Betsch C, Betsch T. Intuition in judgment and decision making. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Schön DA. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Avebury; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Singh H, Petersen LA, Daci K, Collins C, Khan M, El–Serag HB. Reducing referral delays in colorectal cancer diagnosis: is it about how you ask? Qual Safe in Health Care 2010;19: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Smith LK, Pope C, Botha JL. Patients’ help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: A qualitative synthesis. Lancet 2005;366:825–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen RS, Vedsted P, Olesen F, Bro F, Søndergaard J. Does the organizational structure of health care systems influence care-seeking decisions? A qualitative analysis of Danish cancer patients’ reflections on care-seeking. Scand J Prim Health Care 2011;29:144–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar