references
- Sprangers M. Disregarding clinical trial-based patient-reported outcomes is unwarranted: Five advances to substantiate the scientific stringency of quality-of-life measurement. Acta Oncol 2010;49:155–63.
- US Department of Health Human Services, FDA, research, C. f. D. E., Evaluation, H. S. F. C. f. B., & Health, H. S. F. C. f. D. R. Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims: Draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcome 2006;4:79.
- Eriksson M, Lindstrom B. Validity of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale: A systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:460–482.
- Eriksson M, Lindstrom B. Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale and its relation with health: A systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:376–81.
- Eriksson M, Lindstrom B. Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale and its relation with quality of life: A systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:938–44.
- Delbar V, Benor DE. Impact of a nursing intervention on cancer patients’ ability to cope. J Psychosoc Oncol 2001;19:57–75.
- Koinberg I, Langius-Eklöf A, Holmberg L, Fridlund B. The usefulness of a multidiciplinary programme after breast cancer surgery. A prospective and comparative study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2006;10:273–82.
- Börjeson S, Langius-Eklöf A, Tishelman C. State of Science Conference in Cancer Care – identification of front line research topics. Acta Oncol 2010;49:134–35.