Treatment plan comparison using grading analysis based on clinical judgment

References

• Båth M, Månsson LG. Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: A non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation. Br J Radiol 2007;80:169–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman G, Yartsev S, Rodrigues G, Lewis C, Venkatesan VM, Yu E, et al. A prospective evaluation of helical tomotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;68:632–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo GM, Dell’oca I, Broggi S, Fiorino C, Perna L, Pasetti M, et al. Treatment planning comparison between conformal radiotherapy and helical tomotherapy in the case of locally advanced-stage NSCLC. Radiother Oncol 2008; 88:310–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elith C, Dempsey SE, Findlay N, Warren-Forward HM. An introduction to the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques, tomotherapy, and VMAT. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2011;42:37–43.
   Google Scholar
• van Vulpen M, Field C, Raaijmakers CP, Parliament MB, Terhaard CH, MacKenzie MA, et al. Comparing step-and-shoot IMRT with dynamic helical tomotherapy IMRT plans for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62:1535–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Penagaricano J, Moros EG, Corry PM, Yan Y, Ratanatharathorn V. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and linac-IMRT treatment plans for head and neck cancer patients. Med Dosim 2010;35:264–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemierko A. Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: A concept of equivalent uniform dose. Med Phys 1997; 24:103–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson K, Ceberg C, Engström P, Benedek H, Nilsson P, Knöös T. Conversion of helical tomotherapy plans to step-and-shoot IMRT plans – Pareto front evaluation of plans from a new treatment planning system. Med Phys 2011;38:3130–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson K, Ceberg C, Engström P, Knöös T. Beam commissioning and measurements validating the beam model in a new TPS that converts helical tomotherapy plans to step-and-shoot IMRT plans. Med Phys 2011;38:40–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mould RF, editor. Introductory medical statistics. 3rd ed. Bristol and Philadelphia: Institute of Physics Publishing; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• ICRU.Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). ICRU Report 83. J ICRU 2010;10.
   Google Scholar
• Niemierko A. A generalized concept of equivalent uniform dose (EUD). Med Phys 1999;26:1100.
   Google Scholar
• Semenenko VA, Reitz B, Day E, Qi XS, Miften M, Li XA. Evaluation of a commercial biologically based IMRT treatment planning system. Med Phys 2008;35: 851–60.
   Google Scholar
• Quantitative analyses of normal tissue effects in the clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76(3 Suppl):S1–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sterzing F, Uhl M, Hauswald H, Schubert K, Sroka-Perez G, Chen Y, et al. Dynamic jaws and dynamic couch in helical tomotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:1266–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh A, Read PW, Khandelwal SR, Arthur DW, Turner AB, Ruchala KJ, et al. Evaluation of coplanar partial left breast irradiation using tomotherapy-based topotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;71:603–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knöös T, Benedek H, Ceberg C, Nilsson P, Petersson K. Uncertainties in the evaluation of treatment plans, in uncertainties in external beam radiation therapy: AAPM Medical Physics Monograph No. 35. Palta JR, Mackie TR, editors. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing; 2011. p. 117–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ottosson RO, Engstrom PE, Sjostrom D, Behrens CF, Karlsson A, Knöös T, et al. The feasibility of using Pareto fronts for comparison of treatment planning systems and delivery techniques. Acta Oncol 2009;48:233–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thor M, Benedek H, Knöös T, Engstrom P, Behrens CF, Hauer AK, et al. Introducing multiple treatment plan-based comparison to investigate the performance of gantry angle optimisation (GAO) in IMRT for head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol 2012;51:743–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar