Robustness of IMPT treatment plans with respect to inter-fractional set-up uncertainties: Impact of various beam arrangements for cranial targets

References

• Lomax A, Rutz EPH, Goitein G. The clinical potential of intensity modulated proton therapy. Z Med Phys 2004;14:147–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palm Å, Johansson K. A review of the impact of photon and proton external beam radiotherapy treatment modalities on the dose distributions in field and out-of-field; implications for the long-term morbidity of cancer survivors. Acta Oncol 2007;46:462–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomquist E, Bjelkengren G, Glimelius B. The potential of proton beam radiation for intracranial and ocular tumours. Acta Oncol 2005;44:862–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber DC, Schneider R, Goitein G, Koch T, Ares C, Geismar JH, . Spot scanning-based proton therapy for intracranial meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;83:865–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georg D, Bogner J, Dieckmann K, Pötter R. Is mask-based stereotactic head-and-neck fixation as precise as stereotactic head fixation for precision radiotherapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;66:61–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider U, Pedroni E, Lomax AJ. The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 1996;41:111–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäkel O, Reiss P. The influence of metal artefacts on the range of ion beams. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:635–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomax AJ. Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 1: The potential effects of calculational uncertainties. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:1027–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen-Ramshad Y, Vestergaard A, Muren LP, Hoyer M, Petersen JBB. Plan robustness in proton beam therapy of a childhood brain tumour. Acta Oncol 2011;50:791–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomax AJ. Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 2: The potential effects of inter-fraction and inter-field motions. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:1043–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Góra J, Stock M, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Georg D. Is there an advantage in designing adapted, patient specific PTV margins in intensity modulated proton beam therapy for prostate cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Epub 2012 Jul 17.
   Google Scholar
• Homayuni AR, Georg D, Dieckmann K, Stock M, Pötter R, Osztavics A. Evaluation of the reproducibility of patient set-up for a double-mask system using additional thermoplastic pellets for precision radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2011;99:560.
   Google Scholar
• Rutz HP, Weber DC, Goitein G, Ares C, Bolsi A, Lomax AJ, . Postoperative spot-scanning proton radiation therapy for chordoma and chondrosarcoma in children and adolescents: Initial experience at Paul Scherrer Institute. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;71:220–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillbrand M, Georg D. Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity-modulated proton therapy planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2010;11:93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukumitsu N, Okumura T, Mizumoto M, Oshiro M, Hashimoto T, Kanemoto A, . Outcome of T4 (International Union Against Cancer Staging System, 7th edition) or recurrent nasal cavity and paranasal sinus carcinoma treated with proton beam. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;83: 704–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertini F, Hub EB, Lomax AJ. Is it necessary to plan with safety margins for actively scanned proton therapy? Phys Med Biol 2011;56:4399–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenda S, Kohno R, Kawashima M, Arahira S, Hishio T, Nishio T, . Proton beam therapy for unresectable malignancies of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;81:1473–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Comission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU Report No. 78 Prescribing, recording, and reporting proton-beam therapy. Tech Report 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Sejpal SV, Amos RA, Bluett JB, Levy LB, Kudchadker RL, Johnson J, . Dosimetric changes resulting from patient rotational setup errors in proton therapy prostate plans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;75:40–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer J, Bluett J, Amos R, Levy L, Choi S, Nguyen Q, . Spot scanning proton beam therapy for prostate cancer: Treatment planning technique and analysis of consequences of rotational and translational alignment errors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;78:428–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomax NJ, Scheib SG. Quantifying the degree of conformity in radiosurgery treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;55:1409–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon M, Park SY, Shin D, Lee SB, Pyo HR, Kim DY, . A new homogeneity index based on statistical analysis of the dose-volume histogram. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2007; 8:9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park PC, Zhu XR, Lee AK, Sahoo N, Melancon AD, Zhang L, . A beam-specific planning target volume (PTV) design for proton therapy to account for setup and range uncertainties. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;82:329–36.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrikson A, Forsgren A, Hordemark B. Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy. Med Phys 2011;38:1672–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Unkelbach J, Trofimov A, Madden T, Kooy H, Bortfeld T, . Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:591–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar