In Search of an Ideal Skin Substitute

References

• Alexander J. W., Ogle C. K., Stnett J. D., MacMillan B. G. A sequential, prospective analysis of immunologic abnormalities and infections following severe thermal injury. Ann Surg 1978; 188: 809
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alexander J. W., Wheeler L. M., Rooney R. C., McDonald J. J., MacMillan B. G. Clinical evaluation of Epigard, a new synthetic substitute for homograft and heterograft skin. J Trauma 1973; 13: 374
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alsbjörn B. F. Langerhans cell depleted allograft skin on excised burns. Lancet 1983a; I: 1106
   Google Scholar
• Alsbjörn B. F. A depression technique of the epidermal Langerhans cell in cadaver split skin. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1983b; 18: 61
   Google Scholar
• Artz C. P., Becker J. M., Sako Y., Bromwell A. W. Postmortem skin homografts in the treatment of extensive burns. Arch Surg 1955; 71: 682
   Google Scholar
• Batchelor J. R., Hackett M. HL-A matchng in treatment of burned patients with skin allografts. Lancet 1970; II: 581
   Google Scholar
• Bjornson A. B., Altemeier W. A., Bjornson H. S. Complement, opsonins, and the immune response to bacterial infection in burned patients. Ann Surg 1980; 191(3)323
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown J., Winklemann R. K., Wolff K. Langerhans cells in vitiligo: a quantitative study. J Invest Dermatol 1967; 49: 386
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown J. B., Fryer M. P., Randall P., Lu M. Postmortem homografts as “biological dressings” for extensive burns and denuded areas. Immediate and preserved homografts as life saving procedures. Ann Surg 1953; 138: 618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke J. F., Bondoc C. C. Combined burn therapy utilizing immediate skin allografts and 0.5% AgNO3. Arch Surg 1968; 97: 716
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burke J. F., Quinby W. C., Bondoc C. C., Cosimi A. B., Russell P. S., Szyfelbein S. K. Immunosuppression and temporary skin transplantation in the treatment of massive third degree burns. Ann Surg 1975; 182: 183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burleson R., Eiseman B. Mechanisms of antibacterial effet of biological dressings. Ann Surg 1973; 177: 181
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chambler K., Batchelor J. R. Influenze of defined incompatibilities and area of burn on skin-homograft survival in burned subjects. Lancet 1969; I: 16
   Google Scholar
• Colocho G., Graham W. P., Greene A. E., Matheson D. W., Lynch D. Human amniotic membrane as a physiologic wound dressing. Arch Surg 1974; 109: 370
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Copenhagen H. A new collagen tape in reconstructive surgery. Br J Surg 1965; 52: 697
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dogo G. Survival and utilization of cadaver skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1952; 10: 10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott R. A., Jr, Hoehn J. G. Use of commercial porcine skin for wound dressing. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 52: 401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gang R. K., Arturson G., Hakelius L. The effect of split skin allografts on wound epithelialization from autologous patch grafts. An experimental study in rabbits. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 15: 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldalian J., Jelenko C., Callaway D., McKnight J. T. A comparative study of synthetic and biological materials for wound dressings. J Trauma 1973; 13: 32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hait M. R., Battista O. A., Stark R. B., McCord C. W. Microcrystalline collagen as a biologic dressing, vascular prosthesis, and hemostatic agent. Surg Forum 1969; 20: 51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris N. S., Compton J. B., Abston S., Larson D. L. Comparison of fresh, frozen and lyophilized porcine skin as xenografts on burned patients. Burns 1976; 2: 71
   Google Scholar
• Haynes B. W., Jr. Skin homografts—a life-saving measure in severely burned children. J Trauma 1963; 3: 217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson D. A clinical study of the use of skin homografts for burns. Br J Plast Surg 1954; 7: 26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James J. H., Watson A. C. H. The use of opsite, a vapour permeable dressing, on skin graft donor sites. Br J Plast Surg 1975; 28: 107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz S. I., Tamaki K., Sachs D. H. Epidermal Langerhans cells are derived from cells originating in bone marrow. Nature 1979; 282: 324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay G. D. Prolonged survival of skin homograft in a patient with very extensive burns. Ann NY Acad Sci 1957; 64: 767
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klareskog L. U. M., Tjernlund U. M., Forsum U. M., Peterson P. A. Epidermal Langerhans cells express Ia antigenes. Nature 1977; 268: 248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kornberg J., Burns N. E., Kafesjian R., Bartlett R. H. Ultra thin silicone polymer membrane: A new synthetic skin substitute. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1972; 18: 39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Körlof B., Simoni E., Båryd I., Lamke L.-O, Eriksson G. Radiation-sterilized split skin: A new type of biological wound dressing. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 6: 126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamke L.-O, Nilsson G. E., Reithner H. L. The evaporative water loss from burns and the watervapour permeability of grafts and artificial membranes used in the treatment of burns. Burns 1977; 3: 159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langerhans P. Über die Nerven der menschlichen Haut. Virchows Arch Path Anat 1868; 44: 325
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie I. C., Squire C. A. Cytochemical identification of ATPase-positive Langerhans cells in EDTA-separated sheets of mouse epidermis. Br J Dermatol 1975; 92: 523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMillan B. G. Homograft skin: A valuable adjunct to the treatment of burns. J Trauma 1962; 2: 130
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• May S. R., DeClement F. A. Skinbanking methodology: An evaluation of package format, cooling and warming rates, and storage efficiency. Cryobiology 1980; 17: 33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monafo W. W., Tandon S. N., Bradley R. E., Condict C. Bacterial contamination of skin used as a biological dressing. A potential hazard. JAMA 1976; 235(12)1248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris P. J., Bondoc C. C., Burke J. F. The use of frequently changed skin allografts to promote healing in the nonhealing infected ulcer. Surgery 1966; 60: 13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munster A. M., Eurenius K., Katz R. M., Canales L., Foley F. D., Mortensen R. F. Cell-mediated immunity after thermal injury. Ann Surg 1973; 177: 139
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nathan P., Law E. J., MacMillan B. G., Murphy S. H., D'Andrea M. J., Abrahams R. A. A new biomaterial for the control of infection in the burn wound. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1976; 22: 30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niederhuber J., Feller I. Permanent skin homografting in identical twins. Arch Surg 1970; 100: 126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nimmeman J. L., Fisher J. C., Frank H. A. Prolonged survival of human skin allografts following thermal injury. Transplantation 1978; 25: 69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pery J., Tsur H., Horowitz A., Garzit E. Enzymatic chemical modification of human amniotic membrane and skin as a means for the preparation of biological dressing. Burns 1982; 8: 207
   Google Scholar
• Quinby W. C., Jr, Hoover H. C., Scheflan M., Walters P. T., Slavin S. A., Bondoc C. C. Clinical trials of amniotic membranes in burn wound care. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 70: 711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapaport F. T., Lawrence H. S., Thomas L., Converse J. M., Tillett W. S., Mulholland J. H. Cross-reactions to skin homografts in man. J Clin Invest 1962; 41: 2166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rappaport I., Pepino A. T., Dietrick W. Early use of xenografts as biologic dressing in burn trauma. Am J Surg 1970; 120: 144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts M. The role of the skin bank. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1976; 58: 70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robson M. C., Krizek T. J., Koss N., Samburg J. L. Amniotic membranes as a temporary wound dressing. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1973; 136: 904
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saymen D. G., Nathan P., Holder I. A., Hill E. O., MacMillan B. G. Control of surface wound infecstion: skin versus synthetic grafts. Appl. Microbiol 1973; 25: 921
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shircliffe A. C., James P. M., Meredith J. H. Technique for obtaining porcine heterografts for use on burned patients. J Trauma 1974; 14: 168
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shuck J. M., Pruitt B. A., Jr, Moncrief J. A. Homograft skin for wound coverage. A study of versatility. Arch Surg 1969; 98: 472
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sølash;rensen B. The use of non-stored, sterilized body homografts in the treatment of severely burned patients. Research in burns. Transactions of the Second International Congress on Research in Burns. Edinburgh 1965, 20–24 September
   Google Scholar
• Stingl G., Gazze-Stingl L. A., Aberer W., Wolff K. Antigen presentation by murine epidermal Langerhans cells and its alteration by ultraviolet B Light. J Immunol 1981; 127: 1707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stingl G., Wolff-Schreiner E. C., Pichler W. J., Geschnait F., Knapp W., Wolff K. Epidermal Langerhans cells bear Fc & C3b receptors. Nature 1977; 268: 245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavis M. J., Harney J. H., Thornton J. W., Bartlett R. H. Modified collagen membrane as a skin substitute: Preliminary studies. J Biomed Mater Res 1975; 9: 285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tavis M. J., Thornton J. W., Bartlett R. H., Roth J. C., Woodroof E. A. A new composite skin prosthesis. Burns 1980; 7: 123
   Google Scholar
• Tavis M. J., Thornton J. W., Harney J. H., Woodroof E. A., Bartlett R. H. Graft adherence to deepithelialized surfaces: A comparative study. Ann Surg 1976; 184: 594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trier W. C., Sell K. W. United States Navy skin bank. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 41: 543
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unger M. G., Roberts M. Lyophilized amniotic membranes on graft donor sites. Br J Plast Surg 1976; 29: 99
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chin-Chun Yang, Tsi-Siang Shih, Te-An Chu, Wei-Shia Hsu, Shou-Yen Kuo, Yen-Fei Chao. The intermingled transplantation of auto- and homografts in severe burns. Burns 1980; 6: 141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaroff L. I., Mills W., Jr, Duchett J. W., Jr, Switzer W. E., Moncrief J. A. Multiple uses of viable cutaneous homografts in the burned patient. Surgery 1966; 59: 368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar