Secular trends in cranial morphological traits: a socioeconomic perspective of change and sexual dimorphism in North Americans 1849–1960

References

• A’Hearn B. 1998. The antebellum puzzle revisited: a new look at the physical stature of Union Army recruits during the Civil War. In: Komlos J, Baten J, editors. The biological standard of living in comparative perspective. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. p 250–267
   Google Scholar
• Agresti A. 1983. A suvey of strategies for modeling cross-classifications having ordinal variables. J Am Stat Assoc 78:184–198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agresti A. 1984. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York: John Wiley and Sons
   Google Scholar
• Buikstra J, Ubelaker D, 1994. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains: Proceedings of a seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History. Fayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Survey
   Google Scholar
• Buretic-Tomljanovic A, Ostojic S, Kapovic M. 2006. Secular change of craniofacial measures in Croatian younger adults. Am J Hum Biol 18:668–675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron N, Tobias P, Fraser W, Nagdee M. 1990. Search for secular trends in calvarial diameters, cranial base height, indices, and capacity in South African Negro crania. Am J Hum Biol 2:53–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson S. 2011. Height of female Americans in the 19th century and the antebellum puzzle. Econ Hum Biol 9:157–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole T. 2000. Secular trends in growth. P Nutr Soc 59:317–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dautartas A, Godde K. 2008. Are cranial morphological traits population specific? A re-evaluation of traditional sex-estimation methodology. P Am Ac Forensic Sci XIV:349
   Google Scholar
• Dautartas A, Godde K. 2010. Secular trends in cranial morphological sexing: the mastoid process. Proc Am Assoc Forensic Sci 16:393
   Google Scholar
• DeBruine L, Jones B, Crawford J, Welling L, Little A. 2010. The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces. Proc R Soc B 277:2405–2410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBruine L, Jones B, Little A, Crawford J, Welling L. 2011. Further evidence for regional variation in women's masculinity preferences. Proc R Soc B 278:813–814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogel R, Engerman S, Floud R, Steckel R, Trussell J, Wachter K, Margo R, Sokoloff K, Villaflor G. 1979. The economic and demographic significane of secular changes in human stature: the U.S. 1790–1960. NBER working paper
   Google Scholar
• Fogel R. 1986. Nutrition and the decline in mortality since 1700s: some preliminary findings. In: Engerman S, Gallman R, editors. Long-term factors in American economic growth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. p 439–555
   Google Scholar
• Godde K, Dautartas A. 2009. Secular trends in morphological sexing. Proc Am Assoc Forensic Sci 15:311–312
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton M. 1982. Sexual dimorphism in skeletal samples. In: Hall R, editor. Sexual dimorphism in Homo sapiens: a question of size. New York: Praeger. p 107–149
   Google Scholar
• Hintze J. 2006. NCSS, PASS and GESS. Kaysville, UT: NCSS
   Google Scholar
• Ingervall B, Lewin T, Hedegard B. 1972. Secular changes in the morphology of the skull in Swedish men. Acta Odontol Scand 30:539–554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantz R, Meadows Jantz L. 2000. Secular change in craniofacial morphology. Am J Hum Biol 12:327–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantz R. 2001. Cranial change in Americans: 1850–1975. J Forensic Sci 46:784–787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman L, Malkin I, Seibel M, Kobyliansky E, Livshits G. 2008. Age-related changes and secular trends in hand bone size. Homo 59:301–315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmerle E, Ross A, Slice D. 2008. Sexual dimorphism in America: geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region. J Forensic Sci 53:54–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komlos J, Baur M. 2004. From the tallest to (one of) the fattest: the enigmatic fate of the American population in the 20th century. Econ Hum Biol 2:57–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komlos J, Coclanis P. 1997. On the puzzling cycle in the biological standard of living: the case of antebellum Georgia. Explor Econ Hist 34:433–459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komlos J, Lauderdale B. 2007. The mysterious trend in American heights in the 20th century. Ann Hum Biol 34:206–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komlos J. 1987. The heigh and weight of West Point cadets: dietary chance in antebellum America. J Econ Hist 47:897–927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komlos J. 1993. The secular trend in the biological standard of living in the United Kingdom, 1730–1860. Econ Hist Rev 46:115–144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komlos J. 1996. Anomalies in economic history: toward a resolution of the “antebellum puzzle”. J Econ Hist 56:202–214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komlos J. 1998. Shrinking in a growing economy? The mystery of physical stature during the industrial revolution. J Econ Hist 58:779–802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komlos J. 2009a. Anomalies in economic history: toward a resolution of the “antebellum puzzle”. J Econ Hist 56:202–214
   Google Scholar
• Komlos J. 2009b. The height and weight of West Point cadets: dietary change in antebellum America. J Econ Hist 47:897–927
   Google Scholar
• Konigsberg L, Hens S. 1998. Use of ordinal categorical variables in skeletal assessment of sex from the cranium. Am J Phys Anthropol 107:97–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouchi M. 2004. Secular changes in the Japanese head form viewed from somatometric data. Anthropol Sci 112:41–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogman W, Iscan M. 1986. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas
   Google Scholar
• Little A, DeBruine L, Jones B. 2013. Environment contingent preferences: exposure to visual cues on direct male-male competition and wealth increase women's preferences for masculinity in male faces. Evol Hum Behav 34:193–200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little A, Jones B, Penton-Voak I, Burt D, Perrett D. 2002. Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 269:1095–1100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little B, Buschang P, Reyes M. 2006. Craniofacial dimensions in children in rural Oaxaca, Southern Mexico: secular change, 1968-2000. Am J Phys Anthropol 131:127–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin D, Danforth M. 2009. An analysis of secular change in the human mandible over the last century. Am J Hum Biol 21:704–706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows Jantz L, Jantz R. 1999. Secular change in long bone length and proportion in the United States, 1800–1970. Am J Phys Anthropol 110:57–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore-Jansen P. 1989. A multivariate craniometric analysis of secular change and variation amoung recent North American populations. PhD Dissertation. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee
   Google Scholar
• Pawlowski R, Dunbar R, Lipwicz A. 2000. Evolutionary fitness: tall men have more reproductive success. Nature 403:156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2005. R: a language and environment for statistical computing
   Google Scholar
• Saint Onge J, Krueger P, Rogers R. 2008. Historical trends in height, weight, and body mass: data from U.S. Major League Baseball players, 1869–1983. Econ Hum Biol 6:482–488
   Google Scholar
• Steckel R. 1992. Stature and living standards in the United States. In: Gallman R, Wallis J, editors. American economic growth and standards of living before the civil war. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. p 265–310
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson J, Mahoney E, Walker P, Everson P. 2009. Technical note: prediction of sex based on five skull traits using decision analysis (CHAID). Am J Phys Anthropol 139:434–441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart T. 1979. Essentials of forensic anthropology. Springfield: C.C. Thomas
   Google Scholar
• Sunder M. 2011. Upward and onward: high-society American women eluded the antebellum puzzle. Econ Hum Biol 9:165–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunder M. 2013. The height gap in 19th-century America: net-nutritional advantage of the elite increased at the onset of modern economic growth. Econ Hum Biol 11:245–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatarek N, Sciulli P. 2000. Comparison of population structure in Ohio's late archaic and late prehistoric periods. Am J Phys Anthropol 112:363–376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker P. 1995. Problems of preservation and sexism in sexing: some lessons from historical collections for paleodemographers. In: Saunders S, Herring A, editors. Grave reflections: portraying the past through skeletal studies. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press. p 31–47
   Google Scholar
• Walker P. 2008. Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits. Am J Phys Anthropol 136:39–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisensee K, Jantz R. 2011. Secular changes in craniofacial morphology of the portuguese using geometric morphometrics. Am J Phys Anthropol 145:548–559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar