272
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Invited Review

What is the potential for context aware communication aids?

, , &
Pages 448-453 | Received 29 Apr 2015, Accepted 09 Aug 2015, Published online: 29 Sep 2015

References

  • Tetzchner, S., and Martinsen, H., 2000, Introduction to augmentative and alternative communication: Sign teaching and the use of communication aids for children, adolescents, and adults with developmental disorders (London/Philadelphia: Whurr)
  • Palmer, R., Enderby, P., and Hawley, M., 2010, A voice input voice output communication aid: What do users and therapists require? Journal of Assistive Technologies, 4, 4–14
  • Smith, M.M., and Connolly, I., 2008, Roles of aided communication: Perspectives of adults who use AAC. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 3, 260–273
  • Murray, J., and Goldbart, J., 2009, Augmentative and alternative communication: A review of current issues. Paediatrics and Child Health, 19, 464–468
  • Judge, S., and Friday, M., 2011, Ambiguous keyboards for AAC. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 5, 249–256
  • Baird, E., and Mays, J., 2014, “P is a Palindrome”: Case Study comparing quadrant reduction onscreen keyboard and morse code. ISAAC Biennial Conference Proceedings, (Lisbon, Portugal), 21 July 2014, p. 23
  • Judge, S., and Colven, D., 2006, Switch access to technology - A comprehensive Guide (Oxford: The ACE Centre). pp. 1–56
  • Higginbotham, D.J., Shane, H., Russell, S., and Caves, K., 2007, Access to AAC: Present, past, and future. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 243–257
  • Higginbotham, D.J., Lesher, G., and Moulton, B., Evaluating and Enhancing Communication Rate, Efficiency and Effectiveness. Available online at: http://www.aac-rerc.com/archive_aac-rerc/pages/ProjectSite/R4.htm [last accessed 10 September 2015]
  • Levine, S., Gauger, J., Bowers, L., and Khan, K., 1986, A comparison of Mouthstick and Morse code text inputs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 51–55
  • Mackenzie, I., Zhang, S., and Soukoreff, R., 1999, Text entry using soft keyboards. Behaviour and Information Technology, 18, 235–244
  • Krause, J.C., and Braida, L.D., 2002, Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: The effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2165
  • Yuan, J., Liberman, M., and Cieri, C., 2006, Towards an integrated understanding of speaking rate in conversation INTERSPEECH - ICSLP, Ninth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) 17–21 September 2006; ISCA Archive
  • Judge, S., and Townend, G., 2013, Perceptions of the design of communication aids. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48, 366–381
  • McCall, F., Marková, I., Murphy, J., Moodie, E., and Collins, S., 1997, Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 32(Suppl 1), 235–256
  • Judge, S., and Townend, G., 2010, Users’ Perceptions of Communication Aid Design - D4D Project Report (Sheffield: Devices for Dignity). p. 113
  • O’Keefe, B.M., Kozak, N.B., and Schuller, R., 2007, Research priorities in augmentative and alternative communication as identified by people who use AAC and their facilitators. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 89–96
  • Trnka, K., Yarrington, D., McCaw, J., McCoy, K.F., and Pennington, C., 2007, The effects of word prediction on communication rate for AAC. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Companion Volume: Short Papers, NAACL(Stroudsburg, PA, USA) April 2007; Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 173–176
  • Gregory, E., Soderman, M., Ward, C., Beukelman, D.R., and Hux, K., 2006, AAC menu interface: Effectiveness of active versus passive learning to master abbreviation-expansion codes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 77–84
  • Garay-Vitoria, N., and Abascal, J., 2006, Text prediction systems: A survey. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4, 188–203
  • Hill, K., and Romich, B., 2002, A rate index for augmentative and alternative communication. International Journal of Speech Technology, 5, 57–64
  • Light, J., and McNaughton, D., 2014, Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication?Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 1-18
  • Hoag, L.A., Bedrosian, J.L., McCoy, K.F., and Johnson, D.E., 2004, Trade-offs between informativeness and speed of message delivery in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 47, 1270
  • Baxter, S., Enderby, P., Evans, P., and Judge, S., 2012, Interventions using high-technology communication devices: A state of the art review. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 64, 137–144
  • Enderby, P., 2014, Introducing the therapy outcome measure for AAC services in the context of a review of other measures. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 9, 33–40
  • Shannon, C.E., 1948, A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423. Available online at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6773024. [last accessed 1 Nov 2014]
  • Clarke, M., and Kirton, A., 2003, Patterns of interaction between children with physical disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication systems and their peers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19, 135–151
  • Grove, N., 2013, Using storytelling to support children and adults with special needs: transforming lives through telling tales (London: Routledge). p. 136
  • O’Mara, D.A., 2000, Developing personal identity through story telling. IEE Seminar on Speech and Language Processing for Disabled and Elderly People. IEE, 2000, 9/1–9/4. DOI: 10.1049/ic:20000139
  • Blackstone, S.W., and Berg, M.H., 2004, Social Networks: a communication inventory for individuals with complex communication needs and their communication partners (Monterey, CA: Augmentative Communication Inc)
  • Algorithms – Inside Search – Google. (Mountain View, CA: Google Inc.) Available online at: http://www.google.co.uk/insidesearch/howsearchworks/algorithms.html. [last accessed 20 Mar 2015]
  • Apple - iOS 8 - Spotlight. (Cupertino, CA: Apple Inc.) Available online at: https://www.apple.com/ios/whats-new/spotlight/. [last accessed 20 Mar 2015]
  • Contextual targeting – Google Display Network. (Mountain View, CA: Google Inc.) Available online at: http://www.google.co.uk/ads/displaynetwork/find-your-audience/contextual-targeting.html. [last accessed 20 Mar 2015]
  • Apple (United Kingdom) – iOS 8 - QuickType. (Cupertino, CA: Apple Inc.) Available online at: https://www.apple.com/uk/ios/whats-new/quicktype/. [last accessed 20 Mar 2015]
  • Yorkston, K., Dowden, P., Honsinger, M., Marriner, N., and Smith, K., 1988, A comparison of standard and user vocabulary lists. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 189–210
  • Trnka, K., Yarrington, D., McCoy, K., and Pennington, C., 2006, Topic modeling in fringe word prediction for AAC. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces - IUI ’06. (New York, NY, USA) 2006; AMC Press, p. 276
  • Pullin, G., 2009, Design meets disability (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). p. 341
  • Pullin, G., and Cook, A., 2013, The value of visualizing tone of voice. Logopedics, Phoniatrics, Vocology, 38, 105–114. Available online at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23855927. [last accessed 20 Mar 2015]
  • Higginbotham, D.J., Lesher, G.W., Moulton, B.J., and Roark, B., 2013, The application of natural language processing to augmentative and alternative communication. Assistive Technology, 24, 14–24
  • Arnott, J.L., and Alm, N., 2013, Towards the improvement of Augmentative and Alternative Communication through the modelling of conversation. Computer Speech & Language, 27, 1194–1211
  • Wisenburn, B., and Higginbotham, D.J., 2008, An AAC application using speaking partner speech recognition to automatically produce contextually relevant utterances: Objective results. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 100–109
  • Dempster, M., Alm, N., and Reiter, E., 2010, Automatic generation of conversational utterances and narrative for augmentative and alternative communication: A prototype system (Los Angeles, CA: Association for Computational Linguistics). pp. 10–18
  • Black, R., Waller, A., Turner, R., and Reiter, E., 2012, supporting personal narrative for children with complex communication needs. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 19, 1–35
  • Netzer, Y., and Elhadad, M., 2006, Using semantic authoring for Blissymbols communication boards. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Companion Volume: Short Papers, NAACL (Stroudsburg, PA, USA) June 2006; Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 105–108
  • Mobasheri, M., Judge, S., and King, D., 2015, The use of communication aids by intubated patients on intensive care units – A narrative synthesis of a systematic review. In Preparation
  • MacAulay, F., Shearer, A.J., Gordon, B., Judson, A., Etchels, M., Ashraf, S., Ricketts, I.W., Waller, A., Brodie, J.K., Alm, N., Warden, A., 2002, ICU-Talk, a communication aid for intubated intensive care patients. Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies - Assets ’02. (New York, NY, USA) 2002; AMC Press, pp. 226
  • Judge, S., Clarke, Z., Toogood, J., and Hawley, M.S., 2015, The use of communication aids by people with dysarthria. In Preparation
  • Bloch, S., and Wilkinson, R., 2011, Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Methods of resolving understandability problems. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46, 510–523
  • Hawley, M., Cunningham, S., Green, P., Enderby, P., Palmer, R., Sehgal, S., and O’Neill, P., 2012, A Voice-Input Voice-Output Communication Aid for people with severe speech impairment. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 39, 1
  • Dunne, A., 2008, Hertzian tales: electronic products, aesthetic experience, and critical design (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.