Control of upper-limb prostheses

References

• Houk J., Henneman E. Feedback control of muscle: introductory concepts, Medical Physiology, 13th by, V. B. Mountcastle. Saint Louis, Mosby 1974; 608–616
   Google Scholar
• Mann R. W. Force and position proprioception for prostheses. The Control of Upper Extremity Prostheses and Orthoses, P. Herberts, P. Kadefors, R. Magnusson, P. Petersen. Thomas, Springfield, Ill. 1974; 201–209
   Google Scholar
• Clippinger F. W., Avery R., Titus B. A sensory feedback system for an upper limb amputation prosthesis. Bull. Prosthet. Res. 1974; 22: 247–258
   Google Scholar
• Anani A. B., Ikeda K., Körner L. M. Human ability to discriminate various parameters in afferent electrical nerve stimulation with particular reference to prostheses sensory feedback. Med. Biol. Engrg. and Comput. 1977; 15: 363–373
   Google Scholar
• Solomonow M., Lyman J., Freedy A. Electro-tactile two-point discrimination as a function of frequency, body site, laterality, and stimulation codes. Annals of Biomed. Engrg. 1977; 5: 47–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney V. M., Reswick J. Rancho Los Amigos Hospital-Veterans Administration sensory feedback myoelectric prosthesis. Final Report, Rehab. Engrg. Ctr. at Rancho Los Amigos Hospital U. S. G, Downey, California, 1976
   Google Scholar
• Polit A., Bizzi E. Properties of the motor programs underlying visually triggered arm movements in monkeys. Soc. for Neurosci. Abstr 1977; 3: 276
   Google Scholar
• Taub E., Perrella P., Barro G. Behavioral development after forelimb deafferentiation on day of birth in monkeys with and without blinding. Science 1973; 181: 959–960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson D. C., Smith J. G. An externally powered controlled complete arm prosthesis. Jour. of Med. Engrg. and Tech. 1977; 1: 275–277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams T. W. Clinical applications of the improved Boston Arm. Proc. of Conf. on Systems and Devices for the Disabled. 1976; 109–113
   Google Scholar
• Schmeisser G., Seamone W. A five year review of clinical experience with Johns Hopkins University externally powered upper-limb prostheses and orthoses. Bull. Prosth. Res. 1975; 23: 211–217
   Google Scholar
• Dorcas D. S., Dunfield V. A., Scott R. N. Improved myoelectric control system. Med. Biol. Engrg. 1970; 8: 333–341
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mason C. P. Practical problems in myoelectric control. Bull Prosth, Res. 1970; 13: 39–45
   Google Scholar
• Childress D. S., Billock J. N. An experiment with the control of a hybrid prosthetic system: electric elbow, body-powered hook. Bull. Prosth. Res. 1970; 62–77, fall
   Google Scholar
• Aaron S. L., Stein R. B. Comparison of an EMG-controlled prosthesis and the normal human biceps brachii muscle. American Journal of Physical Medicine 1976; 55: 1–14
   Google Scholar
• Morecki A., Kedzior K. Development and testing of the “Warsaw Arm”. Digest of the 11th Intern. Conf. on Med. and Biol. Engrg.. 1976; 22–23
   Google Scholar
• Schmidl H. The INAIL–CECA prostheses. Orthotics and Prosthetics 1973; 27: 1–12
   Google Scholar
• Herberts P., Almström C., Kadefors R., Lawrence P. D. Hand prosthesis control via myoelectric patterns. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1973; 44: 389–406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirta R. W., Taylor D. R. Development of a multi-axis myoelectrically controlled prosthetic arm. Proc. of the Third International Symposium on External Control of Human Extremities, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, 1969
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen S. C. Control systems for artificial arms, Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1973
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen S. C., Jerard R. B., Knutti D. Development and control of the Utah Arm. Advances in External Control of Human Extremities, Jugoslav Committee for Electronics and Automation, Belgrade, 1975
   Google Scholar
• Freedy A., Lyman J., Solomonow M. A microcomputer aided prosthesis control system. Proc. of RO. MAN SY-76 Conference, Warsaw, Poland, 1976
   Google Scholar
• Graupe D. Control of upper-limb prostheses in several degrees of freedom. Bull. Prosth. Res. 1974; 226–236, fall
   Google Scholar
• De Luca C. J., Gilmore L. D., Cudworth A. L. Neuroelectric signal recordings from severed nerves. 1978, In preparation
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg B. K., De Luca C. J. Distinguishability of functionally-distinct evoked neuroelectric signals on the surface of a nerve. 1978, accepted for by I.E.E.E. Trans, on BME.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca C. J., Gilmore L. D., Thomson S. J., Nichols R. T. Chronically Implanted Nerve-Electrodes. Proc. of 2nd Annual New England Bioengineering Conference. 1974; 13.9
   Google Scholar
• De Luca C. J., Gilmore L. D. Voluntary nerve signals from severed mammalian nerves: long term recordings. Science 1976; 191: 193–195
   Google Scholar
• De Luca C. J., Gilmore L. D., Glimcher M. J., Cudworth A. L., Thomson S. J. Histological investigation of severed nerves enclosed in tubes. 1978, In preparation
   Google Scholar
• De Luca C. J., Gilmore L. D., Glimcher M. J., Cudworth A. L., Thomson S. J. Neural Control of Prostheses: A Possibility?. Proc. of 22nd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. 1976; 107
   Google Scholar
• De Luca C. J., Gilmore L. D., Cudworth A. L. A New Control Source for Prostheses. The Digest of the 11th International Conf. on Med. and Biol. Engrg.. 1976; 14
   Google Scholar