Lower-limb prosthetic technologies in the developing world: A review of literature from 1994–2010

References

• International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO). Report of ISPO consensus conference on appropriate orthopaedic technology for low-income countries; Jun 51995; Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Day HJ, Hughes J, Jacobs NA, editors. ISPO1996
   Google Scholar
• Staats TB. The rehabilitation of the amputee in the developing world: A review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996;20(1):45–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings D. Prosthetics in the developing world: A review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996;20(1):51–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes J. Papers from the consensus conference on appropriate prosthetic technology for developing countries held in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 1995 June 5–10, Prosthet Orthot Int 1996;20(1):12–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day HJ. A review of the consensus conference on appropriate prosthetic technology in developing countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996;20(1):15–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg L. USAID's War Victims' Fund. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996;20(1):24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN). Production and distribution of assistive devices for people with disabilities: Part 1New YorkUN1997.
   Google Scholar
• Meanley S. Different approaches and cultural considerations in third world prosthetics. Prosthet Orthot Int 1995;19:176–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISPO. ISPO consensus conference on appropriate orthopaedic technology for low-income countries: Conclusions and recommendations. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001;25(3):168–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonzalez RV, Rispin KL, Moran MK, Ayers SR. An R & D strategy to offer a high-quality and low-cost above knee prosthesis in the developing world. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics Vancouver, Canada; Jul 29, 2007119.
   Google Scholar
• Stark G. Perspectives on how and why feet are prescribed. JPO 2005;17(4S):18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Nilsen R, Zeffer J. Quality benchmark for trans-tibial prostheses in low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 2005;29(1):53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Treichl HB. Mechanical testing of prosthetic feet utilized in low-income countries according to ISO-10328 standard. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31(2):177–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sam M, Hansen AH, Childress DS. Characterisation of prosthetic feet used in low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004;28(2):132–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Raab W. Clinical field testing of vulcanized Jaipur rubber feet for trans-tibial amputees in low-income countries.[republished in Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007;31(1):105–115; PMID: 17365891]. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006;30(3):225–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya AP, Lees A, Nirula HC, Klenerman L. A biomechanical comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces. Prosthet Orthot Int 1995;19(1):37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Craig JG, Mtalo LB, Zelaya CM. Clinical field follow-up of high density polyethylene (HDPE)-Jaipur prosthetic technology for trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004;28(3):230–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Craig JG, Mtalo LB, Zelaya CM. Clinical field follow-up of high density polyethylene (HDPE)-Jaipur prosthetic technology for trans-femoral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004;28(2):152–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poonekar PD. Prosthetic feet: Indian scenario. O&P World 2001;4(3):48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Nilsen R, Zeffer J, Fisk J, Hartz C. Clinical field testing of vulcanized rubber feet for trans-tibial amputees in tropical low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006;30(2):195–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Heim S. Preliminary experiences with modified SACH feet manufactured and used in a tropical developing world setting. Prosthet Orthot Int 1999;23(3):245–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberg T, Eklund A. In focus: Cambodia. OrthoLetter 1996;1:2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Nilsen R, Thanh NH, Saldana A, Hartz C. Clinical field testing of polyurethane feet for trans-tibial amputees in tropical low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006;30(2):182–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier P. Improving foot lifespan for developing countries. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jul 292007, Vancouver, Canada116.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier P. Field test and follow up on foot lifespan used in low-income nations. Proceedings of the 13th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; May 102010, Leipzig, Germany794–795.
   Google Scholar
• Sam M, Childress DS, Hansen AH, Meier MR, Lambla S, Grahn EC, et al. The ‘shape&roll’ prosthetic foot: I. Design and development of appropriate technology for low-income countries. Med Confl Surviv 2004;20(4):294–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meier MR, Sam M, Hansen AH, Childress D. Shape & Roll prosthetic foot: Field testing in El Salvador. Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Aug 12004; Hong Kong120.
   Google Scholar
• Meier MR. Design and development of appropriate technology for low-income countries: preliminary investigation of the Shape & Roll prosthetic foot in El Salvador, Central America. Capabilities 2002;11(3):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Center for International Rehabilitation (CIR). State-of-the-science on appropriate technology for developing countries. Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center (RERC) on Improved Technology Access for Landmine Survivors at the CIRAug 172006; ChicagoCenter for International Rehabilitation2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen AH, Meier MR, Sam M, Childress DS. Alignment of trans-tibial prostheses based on roll-over shape principles. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003;27(2):89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen AH, Meier MR, Sessoms PH, Childress DS. The effects of prosthetic foot roll-over shape arc length on the gait of trans-tibial prosthesis users. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006;30(3):286–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niagara foot trial: Overview of 1 year follow-up visit. KingstonQueen's University2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gabourie R, Beshai M, Bryant T, Burke H. The development and production of assistive devices using a distributed network: The Niagara Foot. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jul 292007, Vancouver, Canada118.
   Google Scholar
• Karunkaran VV. Quality assurance and optimization studies of light weight PU prosthetic foot. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2006;19(2):63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hahl J, Taya M. Experimental and numerical predictions of the ultimate strength of a low-cost composite transtibial prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000;37(4):405–413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saitol M, Nakayama H, Hagiwara S, Sawamura S, Yuki M, Kitayama I, et al. A mass produced trans-tibial prosthesis made of pultruded FRP. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jun 281998, Amsterdam, Netherlands240–243.
   Google Scholar
• Saito M, Sawamura S, Carroll B. Mass-produced prosthesis uses pultruded fiber reinforced plastic. Mod Plast 1997;74:175–177.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng V. A victim assistance solution: adapting bicycle technology for the manufacture of adjustable prosthetic legs for children. CATIMAC 2004 – Canadian appropriate technologies mines action competition 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Prosthetic Outreach Foundation (POF). Prosthetic component manufacturing in Vietnam. Accessed from the website: http://www.pofsea.org/.htm; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Raab W. Clinical field testing of trans-femoral prosthetic technologies: resin-wood and ICRC-polypropylene. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004;28(2):141–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Raab W. Clinical field-testing of ATLAS prosthetic system for trans-femoral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003;27(1):55–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill-Watson S, Sheredos SJ. Report on the evaluation of the DAV/Seattle Knee. J Rehabil Res Dev 1994;31(1):62–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayers SR. Implementation of a new polycentric knee technology in the developing world. Proceedings of the 13th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; May 102010, Leipzig, Germany. 390–391.
   Google Scholar
• Rispin KL. Functional comparison of the legs M1 knee to commonly available developing world alternatives. Proceedings of the 13th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; May 102010, Leipzig, Germany. 724–725.
   Google Scholar
• Ayers SR, Gonzalez RV, Palmer JD. Development of prosthetic knee technology for trans-femoral amputees in developing nations. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jul 292007, Vancouver, Canada; 137.
   Google Scholar
• Mukul P. Stanford-Jaipur knee joint for trans femoral amputees. Proceedings of the 13th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; May 102010, Leipzig, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Andrysek J. A new stance-phase controlled prosthetic knee joint for low-income countries. Proceedings of the 13th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; May 102010, Leipzig, Germany. 728–729.
   Google Scholar
• Meanley S, Reed NK. An ‘appropriate technology’ trans-femoral prosthesis, using materials available in Nepal. Prosthet Orthot Int 1998;22:123–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan R. Roto-molded plastic prosthetic components. OrthoLetter 2004;13:6.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty JK, Patil KM. A new modular six-bar linkage trans-femoral prosthesis for walking and squatting. [erratum appears in Prosthet Orthot Int 1994;18(3):179]. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994;18(2):98–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee P. Low cost prosthetic knee joint. Proceedings of the 13th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; May 102010, Leipzig, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Mobility India. (MI). Product catalog – Mobility India. Accessed 2010 from the website: http://www.mobility-india.org/R&D_Catalogues/catalogue_product.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Poetsma PA, Thanh NH. Sand-casting technique for trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 2005;29(2):165–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y. CIR TF casting system for making transfemoral sockets. Proceedings of the 13th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; May 102010, Leipzig, Germany. 491–492.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Casanova H, Smith WK, Edwards M, Childress DS. CIR sand casting system for trans-tibial socket. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003;27(2):146–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanh NH, Poetsma PA, Jensen JS. Preliminary experiences with the CIR casting system for transtibial prosthetic sockets. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009;33(2):130–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Casanova HR, Reisinger KD, Smith WK, Childress DS. CIR casting system for making transtibial sockets. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009;33(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanh NH. Field experience with sand-casing and Wu-casting systems in Vietnam. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jul 292007, Vancouver, Canada; 89.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Raab W, Fisk J, Hartz C, Saldana A, Harte C. Quality of polypropylene sockets for trans-tibial prostheses in low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006;30(1):45–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeff TT, Poetsma PA, Gasser L, Tung H. Evaluation of use and durability of polypropylene trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1999;23(3):249–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JG, Mtalo LB, Zelaya CM, Jensen JS. Clinical field follow-up of high density polyethylene (HDPE)-Jaipur prosthetics technology for transtibial amputees. Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Aug 12004, Hong Kong; 216.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur MK, Kulshreshtha TK, Bist P, Ranga S, Hatoj M. Clinical evaluation of sand casting system with Jaipur transtibial technology. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jul 292007, Vancouver, Canada; 377.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DG, Burgess EM. The use of CAD/CAM technology in prosthetics and orthotics-current clinical models and a view to the future. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001;38(3):327–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith DG, Boone DA, Harlan JS, Forsgren SM, Burgess EM. Automated prosthetics fabrication in the developing world: the experimental prosthetics center in Hanoi, Vietnam. Loyola University: Chicago1993.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Moreno R, Lemaire ED, Martel GG. Canadian computer-aided technology for central fabrication of prosthetic sockets in Mexico (abstract). Physiother Can 1997;49(Suppl. 2).
   Google Scholar
• Kaphingst W, Leimkuehler R, Heim S, Raab W. Prosthetic CAD CAM results: A pilot study of prosthetic CAD CAM application in the United States of America and People's Republic of China. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jun 281998, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 676.
   Google Scholar
• Marincek C, Gorec D. Experience in Slovenia, using CAD-CAM in prosthetics and orthotics. Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; 2004 Aug 1, Hong Kong; 59.
   Google Scholar
• Boone D, Urban ND, Smith DG, Burgess EM, Mathews DE, Coteman KL. Use of CAD/CAM for prosthetic services in the developing world. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jun 281998, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 74–76.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Moreno R, Bateni H. New CAD/CAM technologies for prosthetics and orthotics. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jun 281998, Copenhagen, Denmark. 95–97.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders JE, Rogers EL, Sorenson EA, Lee GS, Abrahamson DC. CAD/CAM transtibial prosthetic sockets from central fabrication facilities: How accurate are they? J Rehabil Res Dev 2007;44(3):395–405.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sathishkumar S, Manigandan C, Asha T, Charles J, Poonoose PP. A cost-effective, adjustable, femoral socket, temporary prosthesis for immediate rehabilitation of above-knee amputation. Int J Rehabil Res 2004;27(1):71–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao X, Ji W, Jin D. Fabrication of low cost skeleton transtibial socket using plastic tube. Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Aug 12004, Hong Kong; 119.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). International Standard (ISO 10328) – Prosthetics – Structural testing of lower-limb prostheses. ISO1996
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Heim S. Evaluation of polypropylene prostheses designed by the International Committee of the Red Cross for trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2000;24(1):47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanh NH. Polypropylene prosthetic component for a knee disarticulation prosthesis. OrthoLetter 2003;1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Shorter JJ, Harris G, Aulie A, McCarthy J, Woolnough V. Development of a high technology low cost prosthetic system for use in the developing world. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jun 281998, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 245–247.
   Google Scholar
• Shorter JJ, Kemp M, Evans A, McCarthy J. ATLAS: A lower limb prosthetic system for developing world. Report of ISPO consensus conference on appropriate orthopaedic technology for low-income countries; Sep 182000; Moshi, Tanzania. Hughes J, editor. ISPO2000: 186–196.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Raab W. Clinical field-testing of ATLAS prosthetic system for trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002;26(2):86–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JG, Mathur MK. Using the Jaipur limb in a low income country prosthetic medical rehabilitation program. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jul 292007, Vancouver, Canada; 134.
   Google Scholar
• Mirithu JN. The Jaipur polyethylene system. Report of ISPO consensus conference on appropriate orthopaedic technology for low-income countries; Sep 182000; Moshi, Tanzania. Hughes J, editor. ISPO2000219–221.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh R. Evaluation of modular transtibial prosthesis (SATHI). Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jul 292007, Vancouver, Canada; 92.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosal D, Ghosh R, Kumar A. Transtibial polypropylene modular components (SATHI). Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Aug 12004, Hong Kong; 121.
   Google Scholar
• Forman AC. Trans-tibial monolithic thermoplastic prosthesis for developing countries. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jun 281998, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 282–283.
   Google Scholar
• Reisinger K, Casanova H, Wu Y, Moorer C. CIR monolithic limb. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jul 292007, Vancouver, Canada; 133.
   Google Scholar
• Chen NZ, Lee WC, Zhang M. A numerical approach to evaluate the fatigue life of monolimb. Med Eng Phys 2006;28(3):290–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WC, Zhang M. Design of monolimb using finite element modelling and statistics-based Taguchi method. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005;20(7):759–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisinger KD, Casanova H, Wu Y, Moorer C. Comparison of a priori alignment techniques for transtibial prostheses in the developing world – pilot study. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29(11–12):863–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck J, Boone D, Casanova H. A simple prosthetic alignment method for trans-tibial amputees. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jul 32001, Glasgow, UK, TO9.1.
   Google Scholar
• Vecchiotti RG, Allyn KJ, Buell NC, Hafner BJ, Reisinger K, Weber EL, et al. Comparison of standing vs. supine alignment capture methods for monolimb fabrication. Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Aug 12004, Hong Kong; 153.
   Google Scholar
• Lee WC, Zhang M. Fatigue test of low-cost flexible-shank monolimb trans-tibial prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006;30(3):305–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WC, Zhang M, Chan PP, Boone DA. Gait analysis of low-cost flexible-shank transtibial prostheses. IEEE Trans Neur Sys Rehab Eng 2006;14(3):370–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser C, Parsath D, Hari BC. Made in Nepal: A transfemoral prosthetic concept made of HDPE drainpipe. Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Aug 12004, Hong Kong; 118.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner BJ, Sanders JE, Czerniecki J, Fergason J. Energy storage and return prostheses: Does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002;17(5):325–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood HA, Tokuno CD, Eng JJ. A comparison of two prosthetic feet on the multi-joint and multi-plane kinetic gait compensations in individuals with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2004;19(6):609–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier MR, Sam M, Hansen AH, Childress DS. The ‘shape&roll’ prosthetic foot: II. Field testing in El Salvador. Medicine, Conflict Survival 2004;20(4):307–325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen AH, Steer SA, Childress D. Lever compression molding of Shape&Roll prosthetic feet. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jul 292007, Vancouver, Canada474.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen AH, Meier MR, Steer SA, Sam M, Dossud S, Wu Y, et al. Low cost polyurethane rubber prosthetic foot cover. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jul 292007, Vancouver, Canada114.
   Google Scholar
• Arya AP, Klenerman L. The Jaipur foot. J Bone Joint Surg – Br Vol 2008;90(11):1414–1416.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharp M. The Jaipur limb and foot. Med War 1994;10(3):207–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen JS, Raab W. Clinical field testing of vulcanized Jaipur rubber feet for trans-tibial amputees in low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31(1):105–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGirk T. The global scourge of land mines left thousands limbless, and then two gifted Indians developed the $28 foot. Time 1997;150(19):54–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mak AF, Zhang M, Boone DA. State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics-socket interface: A review. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001;38(2):161–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrels JCM. ICRC polypropylene technology. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jun 281998, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 72–73.
   Google Scholar
• Raab W. Preliminary results of survey in Vietnam about polypropylene prosthetic fitting. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jun 281998, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 79–80.
   Google Scholar
• International Commitee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Physical rehabilitation program – Annual report 2008. Geneva, SwitzerlandICRC2008.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for training personelle in developing countries for prosthetic and orthotic services. ScotlandWHO2005.
   Google Scholar
• Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Krizack M, Lindsley A, Wu Y, Reisinger KD, et al. Lower-limb prostheses and wheelchairs in low-income countries. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2008;27(2):12–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu Y, Casanova H, Smith W, Reisinger K, Potts M, Edwards Z, et al. Technology development and transfer of the CIR sand casting system. Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Aug 12004, Hong Kong; 116.
   Google Scholar
• Cha GC, Lee S, Jung SH, Kim KH, Mun MS. Development of quick hardening socket for transtibial prosthesis using new water-curable resin. Proceedings of the 11th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Aug 12004, Hong Kong; 183.
   Google Scholar
• Garachon A. Report on ICRC technical orthopaedic programme for war disabled. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996;20(1):31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedard GG. Plastics thermoforming: getting the best results. O&P Business World 1999;2(4):50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur MK, Kulshreshtha TK, Bist P. Recent advancements in Jaipur limb technology. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; Jul 292007, Vancouver, Canada; 376.
   Google Scholar
• Chaker A. Elaboration of a new composite material with natural reinforcement (alfa) for manufacturing of lower limb prosthesis. Proceedings of the 13th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; May 102010, Leipzig, Germany745–746.
   Google Scholar
• Blocka D. Quality management in prosthetics and orthotics services. OrthoLetter 2002;1:5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Craig JG. Prosthetic feet for low-income countries. JPO 2005;17(Suppl.):47–49.
   Google Scholar