The influence of the reciprocal cable linkage in the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis on paraplegic gait performance

References

• Aljure M D, Eltoria I, Bradley W E, Lin J E, Johnson B. Carpal tunnel syndrome in paraplegic patients. Paraplegia 1985; 23: 182–186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews B. Hybrid FES orthoses for paraplegic locomotion. Congress of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology (ISEK 92) Florence. Italy 1993, 29 June-2nd July, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Bataweel A O, Edwards J. An orthotic/FES system for paraplegic walking with a knee bending swing phase. In: BES symposium on electrical stimulation - clinical systems: Proceedings, Bioengineering Unit, University of Strathclyde 6th-7th April, 1995. BES, London 1995; 7–8
   Google Scholar
• Barlow D H, Hersen M. Single case experimental designs, strategies for measuring behaviour change. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1984
   Google Scholar
• Basker P, Messenger N, Ogilvie C, Rowley D I. Energetics of paraplegic walking. J Biomed Eng 1992; 14: 344–350
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell P H. Using a single-subject research design to evaluate effectiveness of treatment. Am J Occup Ther 1988; 42: 732–738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas R, Larson P F, D'Ambrosia R, McCall R E. The LSU reciprocating-gait orthosis. Orthopedics 1983; 6: 834–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellman H, Sie I, Waters R L. Late complications of the weight-bearing upper extremity in the paraplegic patient. Clin Orthop 1988; 233: 132–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser R M, Strayer J R, May K P. Combined FNS leg and voluntary arm exercise of SCI patients. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering and Biological Society, Washington, DC, 1985, 308–313
   Google Scholar
• Hacker B. Single subject research strategies in occupational therapy. Part I. Am J Occup Ther 1980; 34: 103–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker B. Single subject research strategies in occupational therapy. Part II. Am J Occup Ther 1980; 34: 103–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirokawa S, Grimm M, Le T, Solomonow M, Baratta R V, Shoji H, D'Ambrosia R D. Energy consumption in paraplegic ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and electric stimulation of the thigh muscles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 687–694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Kuhlemeier K V, Moore N B, Fine P R. Energy cost of ambulation in parplegic patients using Craig-Scott braces. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60: 595–600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson R J, Whittle M W. Performance of three walking orthoses for the paralysed: a case study using gait analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990; 14: 103–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsolais E B, Bennett G, Edwards C CT. Energy cost of walking and standing with functional neuromuscular stimulation and long leg braces. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 243–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor J. The evaluation of patient performance using long term ambulatory monitoring technique in the domiciliary environment. Physiotherapy 1981; 67: 30–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nene A V, Major R E. Dynamics of Reciprocal Gait of Adult Paraplegics using the Parawalker (Hip Guidance Orthosis). Prosthet Orthot Int 1987; 11: 124–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nene A V, Hermens H J, Zilvold G. Paraplegic locomotion: a review. Spinal Cord 1996; 34: 507–524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock S J. Clinical trials: a practical approach. J Wiley, Chicester 1983
   Google Scholar
• Price D D, McGrath P A, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983; 17: 45–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose G K. The principles and practice of hip guidance articulations. Prosthet Orthot Int 1979; 3: 37–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett D L. Bias in analytic research. J Chron Dis 1979; 32: 51–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stallard J, Major R E. The case for lateral stiffness in walking orthoses for paraplegic patients. J Eng Med 1993; 207H: 1–6
   Google Scholar
• Tashman S, Zajac F E, Perkash I. Modelling and simulation of paraplegic ambulation in a recriprocating gait orthosis. Trans ASME. J Biomech Eng 1995; 117: 300–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman K, Hansen J E, Sue D Y, Whipp B J. Measurement of the physiological response to exercise. In: Principles of exercise testing and interpretation. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA 1987; 27–46
   Google Scholar
• Winchester P K, Carollo J J, Parekh R N, Lutz L M, Aston JW, Jnr. A comparison of paraplegic gait using two types of reciprocating gait orthoses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993; 17: 101–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittle M W, Cochrane G M. A comparative evaluation of the hip guidance orthosis (HG) and the reciprocating gait orthosis (RGO). Health Equipment Information No. 192. National Health Service Procurement Directorate, London 1989
   Google Scholar
• Yang L, Granat M H, Yang Y, Paul J P, Condie D N, Rowley D I. Further development of hybrid functional electrical stimulation orthoses. Spinal Cord 1996; 34: 611–614
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ijzermana M J, Baardman G, Hermens H J, Veltink P H, Boom H BK, Zilvold G. Prototype hip-knee-ankle-foot-orthosis: the influence of knee flexion in the swing phase on energy cost during paraplegic gait. Proceedings of 11th ISEK Congress. Enschede, The Netherlands 1996; 211–212
   Google Scholar
• Ijzermana M J, Baardman G, Holweg G GJ, Hermens H J, Veltink P H, Boom H BK, Zilvold G. The influence of frontal alignment in the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis on energy cost and crutch force requirements during paraplegic gait. Basic and Applied Myology 1996
   Google Scholar