Modulation of drug (metoprolol succinate) release by inclusion of hydrophobic polymer in hydrophilic matrix

References

• Robinson JR, Lee VHL.(2005). Controlled drug delivery: Fundamentals and Applications., 2nd ed., Vol 29: Marcel Dekker: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Dürig T, Fassihi R. (2000). Evaluation of floating and sticking extended release delivery systems: an unconventional dissolution test. J Control Release, 67:37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sako K, Sawada T, Nakashima H, Yokohama S, Sonobe T. (2002). Influence of water-soluble fillers in hydroxyl propyl methylcellulose matrices on in vitro and in vivo drug release. J Control Release, 81:165–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dürig T, Fassihi R. (2002). Guar-based monolithic matrix systems: effect of ionizable and non-ionizable substances and excipients on gel dynamics and release kinetics. J Control Release, 80:45–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RO 3rd, Reynolds TD, Cabelka TD, Sykora MA, Mahaguna V. (2002). Investigation of excipient type and level on drug release from controlled release tablets containing HPMC. Pharm Dev Technol, 7:181–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman D. (1984). A review of cellulose ethers in hydrophilic matrices. Int J Pharm Tech Prod Manuf, 5:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Jamzad S, Tutunji L, Fassihi R. (2005). Analysis of macromolecular changes and drug release from hydrophilic matrix systems. Int J Pharm, 292:75–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma MVS, Kaushal AM, Garg A, Garg S. (2004). Factors affecting mechanism and kinetics of drug release from matrix based oral controlled drug delivery systems. Am J Drug Deliv, 2:43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo P, Bettini R, Santi P, Ascentis AD, Peppas NA. (1996). Analysis of the swelling and release mechanisms from drug delivery systems with emphasis on drug solubility and water transport. J Control Release, 39:231–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo P, Bettini R, Peppas NA. (1999). Observation of swelling processes and diffusion front position during swelling in hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) matrices containing a soluble drug. J Control Release, 61:83–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melia CD. (1990). Hydrophilic matrix sustained release systems based on polysaccharide carriers. Crit Rev Ther Drug, 8:395–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Zhang F, McGinity JW. (2001). Properties of lipophilic matrix tablets containing phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride prepared by hot-melt extrusion. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 52:181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari SB, Murthy TK, Pai RM, Mehta PR, Chowdary PB. (2003). Controlled release formulation of Tramadol Hydrochloride using hydro-philic and hydrophobic matrix system. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech, 4:E31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siddique S, Khanam J, Bigoniya P. (2010). Development of sustained release capsules containing “coated matrix granules of metoprolol tartrate”. AAPS Pharmscitech, 11:1306–1314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven E, Vervaet C, Remon JP. (2006). Xanthan gum to tailor drug release of sustained release ethyl cellulose mini-matrices prepared via hot-melt extrusion: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 63:320–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalsenjak I, Nicolaidou CF, Nixon JR. (1977). Dissolution from tablets prepared using ethyl cellulose microcapsules. J Pharm Pharmacol, 29:169–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbuga J. (1991). Furosemide-loaded ethyl cellulose microspheres prepared by spherical crystallization technique: morphology and release characterization. Int J Pharm, 76:193–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gohel MC, Patel TP, Bariya SH. (2003). Studies in preparation and evaluation of pH independent sustained-release matrix tablets of verapamil HCl using directly compressible Eudragits. Pharm Dev Tech, 8:323–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe RC. (1992). Molecular weight dependence of the properties of ethyl cellulose and hydroxyl propyl methylcellulose films. Int J Pharm, 88:405–408.
   Google Scholar
• Shaikh NA, Abidi SE, Block LH. (1987). Evaluation of ethyl cellulose as a matrix for prolonged release formulations. Part 1. Water-soluble drugs acetaminophen theophylline. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 13:1345–1369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay V, Fassihi R. (2000). A novel approach for constant rate delivery of highly soluble bioactives from a simple monolithic system. J Control Release, 67:67–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshmukh VN, Sakarkar DM, Singh SP. (2009). Development and evaluation of sustained release matrix tablet using hydrophilic gums as release modifier. J Pharm Res, 2:159–163.
   Google Scholar
• Singh B, Ahuja N. (2002). Development of controlled-release buccoadhesive hydrophilic matrices of diltiazem hydrochloride: optimization of bioadhesion, dissolution, and diffusion parameters. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 28:431–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh B, Kumar R, Ahuja N. (2005). Optimizing drug delivery systems using systematic “design of experiments.” Part I: fundamental aspects. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst, 22:27–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Taani BM, Tashtoush BM. (2003). Effect of microenvironment pH of swellable and erodable buffered matrices on the release characteristics of diclofenac sodium. AAPS Pharmscitech, 4:E43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ammar HO, Salama HA, Ghorab M, Mahmoud AA. (2006). Implication of inclusion complexation of glimepiride in cyclodextrin–polymer systems on its dissolution, stability and therapeutic efficacy. Int J Pharm, 320:53–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura K, Nara E, Akiyama Y. (2006). Development of an oral sustained release drug delivery system utilizing pH-dependent swelling of carboxyvinyl polymer. J Control Release, 111:309–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews BR. (1999). Regulatory aspects of stability testing in Europe. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 25:831–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsson B, Lu¨cker P, Olofsson B. (1990). The relationship between metoprolol plasma concentration and β1-blockade in healthy subjects: a study on conventional metoprolol and metoprolol CR/ZOK formulations. J Clin Pharmacol, 30:S46–S54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Saidana SM, KrishnaiahaYSR Satyanarayanab, V, Bhaskar P, Karthikeyan RS. (2004). Pharmacokinetic evaluation of guar gum-based three-layer matrix tablets for oral controlled delivery of highly soluble metoprolol tartrate as a model drug. Eur J Pharm and Biopharm, 58:697–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar