Investigation of the physical–mechanical properties of Eudragit^® RS PO/RL PO and their mixtures with common pharmaceutical excipients

References

• Celik M. (1992). Overview of compaction data-analysis techniques. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 18(6–7):767–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowhan ZT. (1980). Role of binders in moisture-induced hardness increase in compressed tablets and its effect on in vitro disintegration and dissolution. J Pharm Sci, 69:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denny PJ. (2002). Compaction equations: a comparison of the Heckel and Kawakita equations. Powder Technol, 127(2):162–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson B, Wikberg M, Ek R, Alderborn G. (1995). Compression behavior and compactibility of microcrystalline cellulose pellets in relationship to their pore structure and mechanical properties. Int J Pharm, 117(1):57–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller FX, Augsburger LL. (1994). The role of the displacement-time waveform in the determination of Heckel behaviour under dynamic conditions in a compaction simulator and a fully-instrumented rotary tablet machine. J Pharm Pharmacol, 46:468–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicklasson F, Alderborn G. (2000). Analysis of the compression mechanics of pharmaceutical agglomerates of different porosity and composition using the Adams and Kawakita equations. Pharm Res, 17:949–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnergaard JM. (2006). Quantification of the compactibility of pharmaceutical powders. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 63:270–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoag SW, Dave VS, Moolchandani V. Compression and compaction. Pharmaceutical dosage forms: tablets, Third ed. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2008. 555–630.
   Google Scholar
• Hentzschel CM, Alnaief M, Smirnova I, Sakmann A, Leopold CS. (2012). Tableting properties of silica aerogel and other silicates. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 38:462–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbu L, Bauer-Brandl A, Alderborn G, Tho I. (2012). Effect of degree of methoxylation and particle size on compression properties and compactibility of pectin powders. Pharm Dev Technol, 17:333–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckel RW. (1961). Density-pressure relationships in powder compaction. Trans Metall Soc AIME, 221(4):671–675.
   Google Scholar
• Heckel RW. (1961). An analysis of powder compaction phenomena. Trans Metall Soc AIME, 221(5):1001–1008.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze MD, McGinity JW. (1993). Indices of tableting performance for acrylic resin polymers with plastic and brittle drugs. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 19(12):1393–1411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze MD, Williams RO, Mcginity JW. (1990). Compaction properties of acrylic resin polymers with plastic and brittle drugs. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 16(5):741–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatavarti AS, Muller FX, Hoag SW. (2008). Evaluation of the deformation behavior of binary systems of methacrylic acid copolymers and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose using a compaction simulator. Int J Pharm, 348:46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnergaard JM. (1999). A critical evaluation of the Heckel equation. Int J Pharm, 193:63–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilkka J, Paronen P. (1993). Prediction of the compression behaviour of powder mixtures by the Heckel equation. Int J Pharm, 94:181–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts RJ, Rowe RC. (1985). The effect of punch velocity on the compaction of a variety of materials. J Pharm Pharmacol, 37:377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts RJ, Rowe RC. (1986). The effect of the relationship between punch velocity and particle size on the compaction behaviour of materials with varying deformation mechanisms. J Pharm Pharmacol, 38:567–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye CK, Sun CC, Amidon GE. (2005). Evaluation of the effects of tableting speed on the relationships between compaction pressure, tablet tensile strength, and tablet solid fraction. J Pharm Sci, 94:465–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruegger CE, Celik M. (2000). The effect of compression and decompression speed on the mechanical strength of compacts. Pharm Dev Technol, 5:485–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollan MJ, Celik M. (1996). The effects of lubrication on the compaction and post-compaction properties of directly compressible maltodextrins. Int J Pharm, 144:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmouni M, Lenaerts V, Massuelle D, Doelker E, Leroux JC. (2002). Influence of physical parameters and lubricants on the compaction properties of granulated and non-granulated cross-linked high amylose starch. Chem Pharm Bull, 50:1155–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Veen B, Bolhuis GK, Wu YS, Zuurman K, Frijlink HW. (2005). Compaction mechanism and tablet strength of unlubricated and lubricated (silicified) microcrystalline cellulose. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 59:133–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mužíková J, Eimerová I. (2011). A study of the compaction process and the properties of tablets made of a new co-processed starch excipient. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 37:576–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hentzschel CM, Sakmann A, Leopold CS. Comparison of traditional and novel tableting excipients – physical and compaction properties. Pharm Dev Technol, 0(0):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Sun CC. (2004). A novel method for deriving true density of pharmaceutical solids including hydrates and water-containing powders. J Pharm Sci, 93:646–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik M, Travers DN. (1985). The use of an Elastic Recovery Index as a criterion of compactional behaviour of some direct compression bases. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 11(2):299–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garr JSM, Rubinstein MH. (1991). An investigation into the capping of paracetamol at increasing speeds of compression. Int J Pharm 72:117–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong NA, Haines-Nutt RF. (1972). Elastic recovery and surface area changes in compacted powder systems. J Pharm Pharmacol, 24:Suppl:135P–Suppl:1136.
   Google Scholar
• Sun CQ, Grant DJW. (2001). Influence of elastic deformation of particles on Heckel analysis. Pharm Dev Technol, 6(2):193–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus-Medina M, Lanz M, Kumar V, Leuenberger H. (2004). Comparative evaluation of the powder properties and compression behaviour of a new cellulose-based direct compression excipient and Avicel PH-102. J Pharm Pharmacol, 56:951–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picker KM. (2001). Time dependence of elastic recovery for characterization of tableting materials. Pharm Dev Technol, 6:61–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michrafy A, Michrafy M, Kadiri MS, Dodds JA. (2007). Predictions of tensile strength of binary tablets using linear and power law mixing rules. Int J Pharm, 333:118–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veen BV, van der Voort Maarschalk K, Bolhuisa GK, Zuurmana K, Frijlinka HW. (2000). Tensile strength of tablets containing two materials with a different compaction behaviour. Int J Pharm, 203(1–2):71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik M, Ong JT, Chowhan ZT, Samuel GJ. (1996). Compaction simulator studies of a new drug substance: effect of particle size and shape, and its binary mixtures with microcrystalline cellulose. Pharm Dev Technol, 1:119–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cole ET, Rees JE, Hersey JA. (1975). Relations between compaction data for some crystalline pharmaceutical materials. Pharm Acta Helv, 50:28–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rees JE, Rue PJ. (1978). Time-dependent deformation of some direct compression excipients. J Pharm Pharmacol, 30:601–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordström J, Alderborn G. (2011). Degree of compression as a potential process control tool of tablet tensile strength. Pharm Dev Technol, 16:599–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiris E, Di Martino P, Berneron C, Guyot-Hermann AM, Guyot JC. (1998). Compression behavior of orthorhombic paracetamol. Pharm Res, 15:1122–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun C, Grant DJ. (2001). Influence of crystal structure on the tableting properties of sulfamerazine polymorphs. Pharm Res, 18:274–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• am Ende MT, Moses SK, Carella AJ, Gadkari RA, Graul TW, Otano AL et al. (2007). Improving the content uniformity of a low-dose tablet formulation through roller compaction optimization. Pharm Dev Technol, 12:391–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuentz M, Leuenberger H. (1999). Pressure susceptibility of polymer tablets as a critical property: a modified Heckel equation. J Pharm Sci, 88:174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuenberger H, Rohera BD. (1986). Fundamentals of powder compression. I. The compactibility and compressibility of pharmaceutical powders. Pharm Res, 3(1):12–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryshkewitch E. (1953). Compression strength of porous sintered alumina and zirconia. J Am Ceram Soc, 36:65–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishino R, Yoshino H, Hirakawa Y, Noda K. (1990). Influence of tabletting speed on compactibility and compressibility of two direct compressible powders under high speed compression. Chem Pharm Bull, 38:1987–1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong NA, Palfrey LP. (1989). The effect of machine speed on the consolidation of four directly compressible tablet diluents. J Pharm Pharmacol, 41:149–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David ST, Augsburger LL. (1977). Plastic flow during compression of directly compressible fillers and its effect on tablet strength. J Pharm Sci, 66:155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duberg M, Nyström C. (1982). Studies on direct compression of tablets. VI. Evaluation of methods for the estimation of particle fragmentation during compaction. Acta Pharm Suec, 19:421–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuentz M, Leuenberger H. (2000). A new theoretical approach to tablet strength of a binary mixture consisting of a well and a poorly compactable substance. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 49:151–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CY, Best SM, Bentham AC, Hancock BC, Bonfield W. (2005). A simple predictive model for the tensile strength of binary tablets. Eur J Pharm Sci, 25:331–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CY, Best SM, Bentham AC, Hancock BC, Bonfield W. (2006). Predicting the tensile strength of compacted multi-component mixtures of pharmaceutical powders. Pharm Res, 23:1898–1905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashaiwoldu AB, Podczeck F, Newton JM. (2004). A study on the effect of drying techniques on the mechanical properties of pellets and compacted pellets. Eur J Pharm Sci, 21:119–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M, Muller FX, Augsburger LL. (2002). Evaluation of the plug formation process of silicified microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm, 233:99–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar