Thermophilic anaerobic digestion: the best option for waste treatment

References

• Ahring BK, Ibrahim AA, Mladenovska Z. 2001. Effect of temperature increase from 55 to 65 degrees C on performance and microbial population dynamics of an anaerobic reactor treating cattle manure. Water Res 35: 2446–2452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahring BK, Sandberg M, Agelidaki I. 1995. Volatile fatty acids as indicators of process imbalance in anaerobic reactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43: 559–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendixen HJ. 1994. Safeguards against pathogens in Danish biogas plants. Water Sci Technol 30: 171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Hassan RM, Ghaly AE, Singh RK. 1985. Design and evaluation of no mix energy efficient anaerobic digester. In: Proc Annual Meeting, Canad Soc. Agric Eng, June 23– 27, Charlottetown, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Blotevogel KH, Fischer U. 1985. Isolation and characterization of a new thermophilic and autotrophic methane producing bacterium: Methanobacterium thermoaggregans sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 142: 218–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolzonella D, Innocenti L, Pavan P, Traverso P, Cecchi F. 2003. Semi-dry thermophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: focusing on the start-up phase. Bioresour Technol 86: 123–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone DR. 2001. Genus IV. Methanothermobacter Wasserfallen, Nölling, Pfister, Reeve and Conway de Macario, 51VP. In: Boone DR, Castenholz RW. and Garrity GM, eds. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, Vol. 1 (pp. 230–233) (The Archaea and the deeply branching and phototrophic bacteria). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bouallagui H, Rachdi B, Gannoun H, Hamdi M. 2008. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of abattoir wastewater and fruit and vegetable waste in anaerobic sequencing batch reactors. Biodegradation 20: 401–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhr HO, Andrews JF. 1977. The thermophilic anaerobic digestion process. Water Res 11: 129–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burggraf S, Fricke H, Neuner A, Kristjansson J, Rouvier P, Mandelco L, Woese CR, Stetter KO. 1990. Methanococcus igneus sp. nov., a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen from a shallow submarine hydrothermal system. Syst Appl Microbiol 13: 263–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Chynoweth DP, Biljetina R. 1990. Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a nonmixed solids concentrating digester. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 24/25: 533–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YR, Varel VH, Hashimoto AG. 1980. Effect of temperature on methane fermentation kinetics of beef-cattle manure. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 10: 325–339.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Qiu TL, Li X, Wang WD, Deng Y, Yin XB, Zhang H. 2008. Isolation and characterization of Methanoculleus receptaculi sp. nov. from Shengli oil field, China. FEMS Microbiol Lett 285: 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Chynoweth DP, Bosch G, Earle JFK, Owens J, Legrand R. 1992. Sequential batch anaerobic composting of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Wat Sci Tech 25: 327–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dague RR, McKinney RE, Pfeffer JT. 1970. Solids retention in anaerobic waste treatment systems. J Water Pollut Control Fed 42: 29–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Borghi A, Converti A, Palazzi E, Del Borghi M. 1999. Hydrolysis and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge and organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Bioproc Eng 20: 553–560.
   Google Scholar
• Duran M, Speece RE. 1997. Temperature staged anaerobic processes. Environ Technol 18: 747–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field RJ, Burger M. (Eds.) 1985. Oscillations and Traveling Waves in Chemical Systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Forster-Carneiro T, Fernandez GLA, Perez GM, Romero GLI, Alvarez GCA. 2004. Optimization of start up phase from municipal solid waste in SEBAC process. Chem Biochem Engg Quaterly 18: 429–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster-Carneiro T, Pérez M, Romero LI. 2007. Composting potential of different inoculum sources in the modified SEBAC system treatment of municipal solid wastes. Bioresour Technol 98: 3354–3366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster-Carneiro T, Pérez M, Romero LI. 2008a. Influence of total solid and inoculum contents on performance of anaerobic reactors treating food waste. Bioresour Technol 99: 6994–7002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster-Carneiro T, Pérez M, Romero LI, Sales D. 2008b. Dry-thermophilic anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of the municipal solid waste: focusing on the inoculum sources. Bioresour Technol 98:3195–3203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerardi MH. (ed.) (2003). The Microbiology of Anaerobic Digesters (pp. 89–92). Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley Interscience Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaly AE, Ben-Hassan RM. 1989. Continuous production of biogas from dairy manure using an innovative no mix reactor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 21/22: 541–559.
   Google Scholar
• Hamed M, Mashad E, Zeeman G, van Loon WKP, Bot GPA, Lettinga G. 2004. Effect of temperature and temperature fluctuation on thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure. Biores Technol 95: 191–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho CC, Tan YK. 1985. Anaerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent by tank digesters. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 35: 155–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson PN, Bousfield S, Summers R. 1981. Methane Production from Agricultural and Domestic Wastes (p. 269). London: Appl. Sci. Publ. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Illmer P, Gstraunthaler G. 2008. Effect of seasonal changes in quantities of biowaste on full scale anaerobic digester performance. Waste Manag 29: 162–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imachi H, Sakai S, Sekiguchi Y, Hanada S, Kamagata Y, Ohashi A, Harada H. 2008. Methanolinea tarda gen. nov., sp. nov., a methane-producing archaeon isolated from a methanogenic digester sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 294–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeanthon C, L’Haridon S, Reysenbach AL, Corre E, Vernet M, Messner P, Sleytr UB, Prieur D. 1999. Methanococcus vulcanius sp. nov., a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen isolated from East Pacific Rise, and identification of Methanococcus sp. DSM 4213T as Methanococcus fervens sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49 Pt 2: 583–589.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanthon C, L’Haridon S, Reysenbach AL, Vernet M, Messner P, Sleytr UB, Prieur D. 1998. Methanococcus infernus sp. nov., a novel hyperthermophilic lithotrophic methanogen isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48 Pt 3: 913–919.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Parshina SN, van Doesburg W, Lomans BP, Stams AJ. 2005. Methanomethylovorans thermophila sp. nov., a thermophilic, methylotrophic methanogen from an anaerobic reactor fed with methanol. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55: 2465–2470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones WJ, Leigh JA, Mayer F, Woese CR, Wolfe RS. 1983. Methanococcus jannaschii sp. nov., an extremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarine hydrothermal vent. Arch Microbiol 136: 254–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamagata Y, Kawasaki H, Oyaizu H, Nakamura K, Mikami E, Endo G, Koga Y, Yamasato K. 1992. Characterization of three thermophilic strains of Methanothrix (“Methanosaeta”) thermophila sp. nov. and rejection of Methanothrix (“Methanosaeta”) thermoacetophila. Int J Syst Bacteriol 42: 463–468.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaparaju P, Angelidaki I. 2008. Effect of temperature and active biogas process on passive separation of digested manure. Bioresour Technol 99: 1345–1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaparaju P, Buendia I, Ellegaard L, Angelidakia I. 2008. Effects of mixing on methane production during thermophilic anaerobic digestion of manure: lab-scale and pilot-scale studies. Bioresour Technol 99: 4919–4928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim K, Hoffmann R, Thomas Klasson K, Al-Dahhan MH. 2005. Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: effect of mode of mixing. Water Res 39: 3597–3606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim IS, Kim DH, Hyun SH. 2002. Effect of particle size and sodium concentration on anaerobic thermophilic food waste digestion. Water Sci Tech 41: 67–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotelnikova SV, Obraztsova AY, Gongadze GM, Laurinavichius KS. 1993. Methanobacterium thermoflexum sp. nov. and Methanobacterium defluvii sp. nov., thermophilic rod-shaped methanogens isolated from the pilot-scale plant for digesting metacrilic wastes. Syst Appl Microbiol 16: 427–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroeker EJ, Schulte DD, Sparling AB, Lapp HM. 1979. Anaerobic treatment process stability. J Water Pollut Control Fed 51: 718–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurr M, Huber R, Konig H, Jannasch HW, Fricke H, Trincone A, Kristjansson JK, Stetter KO. 1991. Methanopyrus kandleri, gen. and sp. nov. represents a novel group of hyperthermophilic methanogens, growing at 110°C. Arch Microbiol 156: 239–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen HE, Munch B, Schlundt J. 1994. Use of indicators for monitoring the reduction of pathogens in animal waste treated in biogas plants. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed 195: 544–555.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lauerer G, Kristjansson JK, Langworthy TA, Konig H, Stetter KO. 1986. Methanothermus sociabilis sp. nov., a second species within the Methanothermaceae growing at 97°C. Syst Appl Microbiol 8: 100–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurinavichus KS, Kotelnikova SV, Obraztsova AY. 1987. A new species of thermophilic methane-forming bacterium Methanobacterium thermophilum. Mikrobiologiya, 57: 1035–1041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lema JM, Mendez R, Iza J, Garcia P, Fernandez PF. 1991. Chemical reactor engineering concepts in design and operation of anaerobic treatment processes. Water Sci Tech 24: 79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L’Haridon S, Reysenbach AL, Banta A, Messner P, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E, Jeanthon C. 2003. Methanocaldococcus indicus sp. nov., a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen isolated from the Central Indian Ridge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53: 1931–1935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie RI, Bryant MP. 1995. Anaerobic digestion of cattle waste at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43, 346–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maestrojuan GM, Boone DR, Xun L, Mah RA, Zhang L. 1990. Transfer of Methanogenium bourgense, Methanogenium marisnigri, Methanogenium olentangyi, and Methanogenium thermophilicum to the genus Methanoculleus gen. nov., emendation of Methanoculleus. Int J Syst Bacteriol 40: 117–122.
   Google Scholar
• Maibaum C, Kuehn V. 1999. Thermophilic and mesophilic operation of an anaerobic treatment of chicken slurry together with organic residual substances Water Sci Technol 40: 231–236
   Google Scholar
• Man-Chang W, Ke-Wei S, Yong Z. 2006. Influence of temperature fluctuation on thermophilic anaerobic digestion of municipal organic solid waste. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 7: 180–185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCarty PL. 1964. Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals. I. Chemistry and microbiology. Public Works 95: 107–112.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon KD, Stroot PG, Mackie RI, Raskin L. 2001. Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions–II: Microbial population dynamics. Water Res 35: 1817–1827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meynell PJ. 1976. Methane: planning a digester. Prism Press, London, pp. 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen HB, Mladenovska Z, Westermann P, Ahring BK. 2004. Comparison of two-stage thermophilic (68°C/55°C) anaerobic digestion with one-stage thermophilic (55°C) digestion of cattle manure. Biotechnol Bioeng 86: 291–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong KW, Greenfield PF, Pullammanapallil PC. 2000. An operational strategy for improved biomethanation of cattle-manure slurry. Biores Technol 73: 87–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onodera M, Ootsu T, Sato E, Kusakabe M, Takesono S, Harashima I, Shigeno T. 2007. Biogas production from waste milk by thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Abstracts J Biotechnol 131: 176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel GB, Sprott GD. 1990. Methanosaeta concilii gen. nov., sp. nov. (“Methanothrix concilii”) and Methanosaeta thermoacetophila nom. rev., comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 40: 79–82.
   Google Scholar
• Pavan P, Musacco A, Cecchi F, Bassetti A, Mata-Alvarez J. 1994. Thermophilic semi-dry anaerobic digestion process of the organic fraction of municipal solids waste during transient conditions. Environ Technol 15: 1173–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez M, Rodriguez-Cano R, Romero LI, Sales D. 2007. Performance of anaerobic thermophilic fluidized bed in the treatment of cutting-oil wastewater. Bioresour Technol 98: 3456–3463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rintala J, Ahring B. 1994. A two-stage thermophilic process for the treatment of source sorted household solid waste. Biotechnol Lett 16: 1097–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivard CJ, Smith PH. 1982. Isolation and characterization of a thermophilic marine methanogenic bacterium, Methanogenium thermophilicum sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 32: 430–436.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlström L. 2003. A review of survival of pathogenic bacteria in organic waste used in biogas plants. Bioresour Technol 87: 161–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith LC, Elliot DJ, James A. 1996. Mixing in up-flow anaerobic filters and its influence on performance and scale-up. Water Res 30: 3061–3073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speece RE. 1983. Anaerobic biotechnology for the industrial wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 17: 416–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spring S, Schumann P, Sproer C. 2005. Methanogenium frittonii is a later synonym of Methanoculleus thermophilus. Int J Syst Microbiol 55: 1097–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenstrom M, Ng A, Bhunia PK, Abramson S. 1983. Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. J Environ Eng ASCE 109: 1148–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetter KO, Thomm M, Winter J, Wildgruber G, Huber H, Zillig W, Janecovic D, Konig H, Palm P, Wunderl S. 1981. Methanothermus fervidus, sp. nov., a novel extremely thermophilic methanogen isolated from an Icelandic hot spring. Zentralbl Bakteriol. Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg Abt 1 Orig. Reihe C 2: 166–178.
   Google Scholar
• Stroot PG, McMahon KD, Mackie RI, Raskin L. 2001. Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions—I. Digester performance. Water Res 35: 1804–1816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suryawanshi PC, Chaudhari AB, Kothari RM. Mesophilic anaerobic digestion: first option for waste treatment in tropical regions (revised MS submitted to Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.).
   Google Scholar
• Suryawanshi PC, Kirtane RD, Chaudhari AB, Kothari RM. 2009. Conservation and recycling of pomegranate seeds and shells for value addition. J Renew Sustain Energy 1: 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suryawanshi PC, Chaudhari AB, Kothari RM. Psychrophilic anaerobic digestion: most desired option for waste treatment in cold regions (revised MS submitted to Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.).
   Google Scholar
• Takai K, Inoue A, Horikoshi K. 2002. Methanothermococcus okinawensis sp. nov., a thermophilic, methane-producing archaeon isolated from a Western Pacific deep-sea hydrothermal vent system. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52: 1089–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takai K, Nealson KH, Horikoshi K. 2004. Methanotorris formicicus sp. nov., a novel extremely thermophilic, methane-producing archaeon isolated from a black smoker chimney in the Central Indian Ridge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54: 1095–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lier JB. 1995. Thermophilic anaerobic wastewater treatment, temperature aspects and process stability. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Vavilin VA, Angelidaki I. 2005. Anaerobic degradation of solid material: importance of initiation centers for methanogenesis, mixing intensity, and 2D distributed model. Biotechnol Bioeng 89: 113–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavilin VA, Zaikin AN. 1971. Effect of solution mixing on a rate of the autocatalytic reaction. Kinet Catal 12: 309–313.
   Google Scholar
• Vedrenne F, Béline F, Dabert P, Bernet N. 2007. The effect of incubation conditions on the laboratory measurement of the methane producing capacity of livestock wastes. Bioresour Technol 99: 146–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserfallen A, Nölling J, Pfister P, Reeve J, Conway de Macario E. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of 18 thermophilic Methanobacterium isolates supports the proposals to create a new genus, Methanothermobacter gen. nov., and to reclassify several isolates in three species, Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus comb. nov., Methanothermobacter wolfeii comb. nov., and Methanothermobacter marburgensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 Pt 1: 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman WB. 2001a. Genus I. Methanocaldococcus gen. nov. In: Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM, eds. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, Vol. 1 (pp. 243–245). The Archaea and the deeply branching and phototrophic Bacteria. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman WB. 2001b. Genus II. Methanothermococcus gen. nov. In: Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM, eds. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, Vol. 1 (pp. 241–242). The Archaea and the deeply branching and phototrophic Bacteria. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman WB. 2001c. Genus II. Methanotorris gen. nov. In: Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM, beds., Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, Vol. 1 (pp. 245–246). The Archaea and the deeply branching and phototrophic Bacteria. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Winter J, Lerp C, Zabel HP, Wildenauer FX, Konig H, Schindler F. 1985. Methanobacterium wolfei, sp. nov., a new tungsten-requiring, thermophilic, autotrophic methanogen. Syst Appl Microbiol 5: 457–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz T, Yuceer A, Basibuyuk M. 2008. A comparison of the performance of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic filters treating papermill wastewater. Bioresour Technol 99: 156–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeikus JG, Wolfe RS. 1972. Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicus sp. n., an anaerobic, autotrophic, extreme thermophile. J Bacteriol 109: 707–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinder SH, Anguish T, Cardwell SC. 1984. Effects of Temperature on Methanogenesis in a Thermophilic (58 degrees C) Anaerobic Digestor. Appl Environ Microbiol 47: 808–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinder SH, Sowers KR, Ferry JG. 1985. Methanosarcina thermophila sp. nov., a thermophilic, acetotrophic, methane-producing bacterium. Int J Syst Bacteriol 35: 522–523.
   Google Scholar
• Zitomer D, Bachman T, Vogel D. 2005. Thermophilic anaerobic digester with ultra filter for solids stabilization. Environ Eng 11: 111–115.
   Google Scholar