The Role of Word Order in the Interpretation of Canonical and Non-Canonical Graphic Symbol Utterances: A Developmental Study

References

• Akhtar, N. (1999). Acquiring basic word order: Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 26, 339–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., MacNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A., Smith, S. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 11, 245–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F., Venza, V. (1984). A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 55, 341–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charvillat, A., Kail, M. (1991). The status of canonical SVO sentences in French: A developmental study of the online processing of dislocated sentences. Journal of Child Language, 18, 591–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chute, D. (1996). Power Laboratory for Macintosh. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• de Villiers, J. G., de Villiers, P. A. (1973). Development of the use of word order in comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 331–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., Tomasello, M. (2008). Young German children's early syntactic competence: A preferential looking study. Developmental Science, 11, 575–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., Thériault-Whalen, C., Dunn, L. M. (1993). Échelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody. Toronto: Psycan.
   Google Scholar
• Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science, 17, 684–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (1992). On the adequacy of the Competition Model. Language, 68, 812–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, R., Gerken, L. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70, 109–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, R., Maye, J. (2005). The developmental trajectory of nonadjacent dependency learning. Infancy, 7, 183–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole, J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. (Vol 3, pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groupe coopératif en orthophonie- Région Laval, Laurentides, Lanaudière (1995). Épreuve de compréhension de Carrow-Woolfolk. French adaptation of the Test of Auditory Comprehension of Language-R. Montréal: Ordre des orthophonistes et audiologistes du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. (1994). The picture communication symbols. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Kail, M. (1989). Cue validity, cue cost and processing types in sentence comprehension in French and Spanish. In B. MacWhinney, E. Bates (Eds.), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing. ( pp. 72–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kail, M. (2004). On-line grammaticality judgments in French children and adults. A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 31, 713–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kail, M., Charvillat, A. (1988). Local and topological processing in sentence comprehension by French and Spanish children, Journal of Child Language, 15, 637–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lempert, H., Kinsbourne, M. (1980). Preschool children's sentence comprehension: Strategies with respect to word order. Journal of Child Language, 7, 371–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Bates, E. (1989) The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miao, X., Chen, G., Yin, H. (1984). Reexamination of the role of word order and lexical meaning in Chinese sentence comprehension. Information on Psychological Sciences, 6, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, K., Newell, A., Alm, N., Waller, A. (1998). How do members of different language communities compose sentences with a picture-based communication system? A cross-cultural study of picture-based sentences constructed by English and Japanese speakers. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, I., Hernandez, A. E. (2006). Sentence interpretation strategies in emergent bilingual children and adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobin, D., Bever, T. G. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A cross-linguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12, 229–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M. (1996). The medium or the message: A study of speaking children using communication boards. In S. von Tetzchner, M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives. ( pp. 119–136), London, UK: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M., Grove, N. C. (2003). Output for individuals who use AAC. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for people who use AAC: From research to effective practice. ( pp. 163–198). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G. (1999). Understanding the impact of graphic sign use on the message formulation structure. In F. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. Arvidson, L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: New directions in research and practice. ( pp. 40–48). London, UK: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A. E., Gallagher, T. M., Morford, J. P., Shahnaz, N. (2002). Interpretation of graphic symbol utterances. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A. E., Morford, J. P. (1998). Constituent order in picture pointing sequences produced by speaking children using AAC. Applied Psycholinguistics 19, 525–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Soto, G., Blockberger, S. (2002). Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 192–204.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Trudeau, N., Morford, J., Rios, M. N., Poirier, M.-A. (2010). Preschool-aged children have difficulty constructing and interpreting simple utterances composed of graphic symbols. Journal of Child Language, 37 (1), 1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taman, H. A. (1993). The utilization of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic cues in the assignment of subject role in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 299–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Dagenais, E., de Broek, S., Morford, J. (2007). Construction of graphic symbol utterances by children, teenagers, and adults: The impact of structure and task demands. Journal of Speech-Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1314–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vion, M., Amy, G. (1984). Comprendre les relations agent-patient dans les énoncés simples en français. Une étude génétique du traitement des structures clivées. Archives de psychologie, 52, 209–229.
   Google Scholar