Strategies in Construction and Interpretation of Graphic-Symbol Sequences by Individuals who use AAC Systems

References

• Baker, B. (1982). Minspeak: A semantic compaction system that makes self-expression easier for communicatively disabled individuals. Byte, 7, 186–202.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A., Sevcik, R., & Romski, M. (2006). Exploring visual-graphic symbol acquisition by pre-school age children with developmental and language delays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 10–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Berens, J., Del Campo, S., & Rivera, D. (2008). Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 323–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 30–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 123–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockberger, S., & Johnston, J. R. (2001). Grammatical morphology acquisition by children with extremely limited speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 207–221.
   Google Scholar
• Blockberger, S., & Sutton, A. (2003). Toward linguistic competence: Language experience and knowledge of children with extremely limited speech. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for people who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 63–106). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L., Sherbenou, R., & Johnsen, S. (1997). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence. (3rd ed.) Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, J., & Trembath, D. (2006). Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during a week-long intervention program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 300–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgemeister, B., Blum, L., & Lorge, I. (1972). Columbia Mental Maturity Scale (CMMS). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1985). Test for the Auditory Comprehension of Language-Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Chute, D. (1996). PowerLaboratory for Macintosh. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Comité québécois de la communication non orale. (2002). ParlerPictos. Montréal: CQCNO.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., Thériault-Whalen, C., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Échelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody. Toronto: Psycan.
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, J., Sigafoos, J., Simpson, R., & Cook, K. (2008). Generalization of a pictorial alternative communication system across instructors and distance. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hehner, B. (1980). Blissymbols for use. Toronto: Blissymbol Communication International.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. (1994). The Picture Communication Symbols. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, S. K., & Light, J. C. (2001). Fifteen years later: An investigation of the long-term outcomes of augmentative and alternative communication interventions. (Report No. HB24B990069). University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED458727)
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (1998). Communication development in augmented modalities: Language without speech. In R. Paul (Ed.), Exploring the speech-language connection. (pp. 139–162). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R. (2006). Comprehension: An overlooked component in augmented language development. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 159–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ska, B. (Ed.). (1995). Épreuve de compréhension de Carrow-Woolfolk. Montréal: Groupe coopératif en orthophonie pour la Région des Laurentides.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M., & Grove, N. C. (2003). Asymmetry in input and output for individuals who use AAC. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for people who use AAC: From research to effective practice. (pp. 163–198). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J. (2009). Iconicity in the development of picture skills: Typical development and implications for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 187–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., & Gallagher, T. (1995). Comprehension assessment of a child using an AAC system: A comparison of two techniques. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A. E., Gallagher, T., Morford, J. P., & Shahnaz, N. (2000). Relative clause sentence production using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 473–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A. E., Gallagher, T. M., Morford, J. P., & Shahnaz, N. (2002). Interpretation of graphic symbol utterances. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A. E., Morford, J. P., & Gallagher, T. (2004). Production and comprehension of graphic symbol utterances expressing complex propositions by adults who use AAC systems. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 349–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Trudeau, N., Morford, J., Rios, M., & Poirier, M. A. (2010). Preschool-aged children have difficulty constructing and interpreting simple utterances composed of graphic symbols. Journal of Child Language, 37, 1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Dagenais, E., de Broeck, S., & Morford, J. (2007). Construction of graphic symbol utterances by children, teenagers, and adults: The impact of structure and task demands. Journal of Speech-Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1314–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Morford, J. P., & Sutton, A. (2010). The role of word order in the interpretation of canonical and non-canonical graphic symbol utterances: A developmental studyAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 108–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widgit Software (2000). Écrire en symboles 2000 [computer software]. , UK: Widgit Software, Ltd.
   Google Scholar