Reducing the Risk of Being a Victim of Crime in South Africa: You can tell and be Heard!

References

• Bondy, A. S., & Frost, L. A. (1994). The Picture Exchange Communication System. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 9(3), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bornman, J., Alant, E., & Du Preez, A. (2009). Translucency and learnability of Blissymbols in different countries: An exploration. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 287–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borthwick, C., & Crossley, R. (1998, August). Gagged in the box – non-speech communication and the law. Paper presented at the eighth biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Brotherson, M. J., & Goldstein, B. L. (1992). Quality design of focus groups in early childhood special education research. Journal of Early Intervention, 16, 334–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownridge, D. A. (2006). Partner violence against women with disabilities: Prevalence, risk and explanations. Violence against Women, 12, 805–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N. (2010). Review of court cases in the United States related to testifying in court as a witness of a crime or abuse on their own behalf using an AAC system Unpublished paper, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University
   Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N. (2008). Vocabulary to support socially-valued adult roles. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 294–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N. (2009, August). Speaking up and speaking out: Reducing the risk of being a victim of crime and of natural/man-made disasters Workshop presented at the Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, University of Pretoria, South Africa
   Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N., & Frantz, B. (2000, August). Reducing the victimization of people with significant speech disabilities. Paper presented at the ninth biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N., & Ravitch, R. (2009). Emergency communication 4 all: Picture communication aidPhiladelphia, PA: Institute on Disabilities at Temple University
   Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N., Carey, A., & Frantz, B. (2005). Ending the silence: Adults who use augmentative communication and their experiences as victims of crime. Journal of Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Central Intelligence Agency. (2009). World Factbook Retrieved April 1, 2009, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee, C. (2005). An explorative study of the training needs for investigating officers interviewing young victims of sexual abuse (Unpublished master's thesis). South Africa: Stellenbosch University
   Google Scholar
• Collier, B. (2000). See what we say. Situational vocabulary for adults who use augmentative and alternative communicationBaltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes
   Google Scholar
• Davies, L. (2002). People with mental disabilities and sexual violence: The ARC. Retrieved September 4, 2009, from http://www.theorac.org
   Google Scholar
• Frey, J. H., & Fontana, A. (1993). The group interview in social research. Successful focus groups. Advancing the state of the artIn D.L. Morgan (Ed.), (pp. 20–34). Newbury, UK: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C. A., Crain, S., & Elder, P. S. (1994). Communication displays for engineered preschool environmentsSolana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson
   Google Scholar
• Grobbelaar-du Plessis, I. (2007). African women with disabilities: The victims of multilayered discrimination. Suid Afrika Publiekreg/South Africa Public Law, 22, 406–421.
   Google Scholar
• Groce, N. E., & Trasi, R. (2004). Rape of individuals with disability: AIDS and the folk belief of virgin cleansing. The Lancet, 363(9422), 1663–1664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiryLondon, UK: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Hanass-Hancock, J. (2009). Interweaving conceptualizations of gender and disability in the context of vulnerability to HIV/AIDS in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa. Sexuality and Disability, 27, 35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higham, S., Tönsing, K. M., & Alant, E. (2010). Teachers' interactions during storybook reading: A rural African perspective. Early Education and Development, 21, 392–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffart, N. (1991). A member check procedure to enhance rigor in naturalistic research. Western Journal of Research Practice, 13(4), 522–534.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howe, K. (2000). Violence against women with disabilities: An overview of the literature. Retrieved February 4, 2010, from http://www.wwda.org.au/keran.htm
   Google Scholar
• Jewkes, R. K., Sikweyiya, Y., Morrell, R., & Dunkle, K. (2008). Understanding men's health and use of violence: Interface of rape and HIV/AIDS in South Africa. Technical reportPretoria, South Africa: Medical Research Council
   Google Scholar
• Keilty, J., & Connelly, G. (2001). Making a statement: An exploratory study of barriers facing women with intellectual disability when making a statement about sexual assault. Disability and Society, 16, 274–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimchi, J., Polivka, B., & Stevenson, J. S. (1991). Triangulation: Operational definitions. Nursing Research, 40, 364–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 214–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogh, K. S., & Lindsay, P. H. (1999). Including people with disabilities in research: Implications for the field of augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 222–233.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied researchNewbury, UK: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Lehohla, P. (2003). Census 2001: Census in brief (Report No.03-02). Pretoria, South Africa: Statistics South Africa
   Google Scholar
• Madu, S. N. (2001). The prevalence and patterns of childhood abuse and perpetrator relationship among a sample of university students. South African Journal of Psychology, 31(4), 32–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson, R. (1992). The Picture Communication SymbolsSolana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (1996). What is a method? Qualitative Health Research, 6, 467–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C. R., & St. Louis, K. W. (1988). Communication programming for persons with severe handicaps: Vocal and augmentative strategies (2nd edn)Austin, TX: PRO-ED
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, M. A., Howland, C. A., & Young, M. E. (1997). Abuse of women with disabilities: Policy implications. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 8, 157–175.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Deputy President. (1997). Integrated national disability strategy. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.info.gov.za/whitepapers/1997/disability.htm
   Google Scholar
• Phasha, N., & Myaka, L. (2009). A custom distorted: Beliefs about sexual abuse involving teenagers with intellectual disability at a rural setting in South Africa (Unpublished manuscript). South Africa: University of Johannesburg
   Google Scholar
• Peshkin, A. (1993). The goodness of qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22, 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, L. E., & Oschwald, M. (2004). Violence and abuse against people with disabilities: experiences, barriers and prevention strategiesPortland, OR: Oregon Health and Science University Center on Self-Determination Retrieved April 18, 2010, from http://www.directcareclearinghouse.org/download/AbuseandViolenceBrief%203-7-04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rand, M. R., & Harrell, E. (2009). Crime against people with disabilities, 2007. National Crime Victimization Survey(Publication No. NCJ 227814). US Department of Justice Retrieved December 7, 2010, from http://bjs. ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/capd07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rousso, H. (2003). Education for all: A gender and disability perspective Retrieved February 2, 2010, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DISABILITY/Resources/280658-1172610312075/EducationforallRousso.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sobsey, D. (1994). Violence and abuse in the lives of people with disabilities. The end of silent acceptance?Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks
   Google Scholar
• Sobsey, D., & Doe, T. (1991). Patterns of sexual abuse and assault. Sexuality and Disability, 9, 243–259.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. M. (2000). Violence and abuse against children with disabilities (Unpublished paper). Omaha, NE: Center for Abused Children with Disabilities. Boys Town National Research Hospital
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2008). World languages report survey questionnaire Retrieved April 2, 2008, from http://www.salanguages.com/unesco/northernsotho.htm
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF (2005). Childhood under threat. The state of the world's children, New York: UNICEF.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2003, August). The eighth United Nations survey on crime trends and the operations of criminal justice systems, 2001–2002 Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/Eighth-United-Nations-Survey-on-Crime-Trends-and-the-Operations-of-Criminal-Justice-Systems.html
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. (1993). Vulnerable victims? A current awareness on the victimization of people with learning disabilities. Disability, Handicap and Society, 8(2), 161–172.
   Google Scholar