488
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Identifying Performing and Under Performing Graphic Symbols for Verbs and Prepositions in Animated and Static Formats: A Research Note

, , , &
Pages 205-214 | Received 07 Jan 2011, Accepted 11 May 2011, Published online: 18 Oct 2011

References

  • Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda P. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Bedrosian, J. (1995). Limitations in the use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 6–10.
  • Bornman, J., Alant, E., & du Preez A. (2009). Translucency and learnability of Blissymbols in Setswana-speaking children: An exploration. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 287–298.
  • Brown, R. (1977). Why are signed languages easier to learn than spoken languages? Part two. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 32, 25–44.
  • Gangkofer, M. (1990). Bilder lesen muss man lernen: Grundschüler deuten BLISS-Symbole. In H. Brügelmann & H. Balhorn (Eds.), Das Gehirn, sein Alfabet und andere Geschichten ( pp. 169–177). Konstanz: Faude.
  • Hancock, H. E., Rogers, W. A., Schroeder, D., & Fisk, A. D. (2004). Safety symbol comprehension: Effects of symbol type, familiarity, and age. Human Factors, 46, 183–195.
  • Higginbotham, J. (1995). Use of non-disabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 2–5.
  • Jagaroo, V., & Wilkinson K. (2008). Further considerations of visual cognitive neuroscience in aided AAC: The potential role of motion perception systems in maximizing design display. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 29–42.
  • Lloyd, L. L., Fuller, D. R., & Arvidson H. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Mineo, B. A., Peischl, D., & Pennington C. (2008). Moving targets: The effect of animation on identification of action word representations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 162–173.
  • Schlosser, R. W., Shane, H., Sorce, J., Koul, R., Bloomfield, E., Debrowski, L., DeLuca, T., Miller, S., Schneider, D., & Neff A. (in press). Animation of graphic symbols representing actions and prepositions: Effects on transparency, name agreement, and identification. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
  • Schlosser, R. W., & Sigafoos J. (2002). Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 102–123.
  • Stephenson, J. (2009). Iconicity in the development of picture skills: Typical development and implications for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 198–201.
  • Zangari, C., Lloyd, L. L., & Vicker B. (1994). Augmentative and alternative communication: An historic perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 27–59.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.