A Comparison of Communication Using the Apple iPad and a Picture-based System

References

• Anderson, A., Moore, D., & Bourne T (2007). Functional communication and other concomitant behavior change following PECS training: A case study. Behaviour Change, 24, 173–181.
   Google Scholar
• Bondy, A. S., & Frost L. A. (1994). The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS). Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Canella-Malone, H., DeBar, R. M., & Sigafoos J (2009). An examination of preference for augmentative and alternative communication devices with two boys with significant intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 262–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carr, D., & Felce J (2007). The effects of PECS teaching to Phase III on the communicative interactions between children with autism and their teachers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 724–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlop-Christy, M. H., Carpenter, M., Le, L., LeBlanc, L., & Kellet K (2002). Using the picture exchange communication system (PECS) with children with autism: Assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior, and problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 213–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cihak, D. F., Wright, R., & Ayers M. K. (2010). Use of self-modeling static-picture prompts via a handheld computer to facilitate self-monitoring in the general education classroom. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 136–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, V. M. (1999). Functional communication training using assistive devices: Effects on challenging behavior and affect. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 168–176.
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, J. B., & Simpson R (2004). Effects on communicative requesting and speech development of the Picture Exchange Communication System in children with characteristics of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 395–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammill, D. D., & Newcomer P. L. (2008a). Test of language development− intermediate (4th ed.).San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hammill, D. D., & Newcomer P. L. (2008b). Test of language development – primary (4th ed.) San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Green, V. A., O’Reilly, M. F., Mulloy, A., & Lancioni G. E. (2010). Behavioral intervention promotes successful use of an iPod-based communication device by an adolescent with autism. Clinical Case Studies, 9, 328–338.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey-Glenn, P., & Gentry J (2008). Improving vocabulary skills through assistive technology: Rick’s story. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 5(2), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive, M., de la Cruz, B., Davis, T. N., Chan, J. M., Lang, R. B., O’Reilly, M. F., & Dickson S. M. (2007). The effects of enhanced milieu teaching and a voice output communication aid on the requesting of three children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1505–1513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roid, G. H., & Miller L. J. (2002). Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Wood-Dale, IL: Stoelting Co.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik R. A. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication for children with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 3, 363–368.
   Google Scholar
• Schepis, M. M., Reid, D. H., & Behrmann M. M., & Sutton K. A. (1998). Increasing communicative interactions of young children with autism using a voice output communication aid and naturalistic teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 561–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuler, A., & Baldwin M (1981). Non-speech communication and childhood autism. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 12, 246–257.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, I. S., Garfinkle, A. N., & Bauer J (1998). The picture exchange communication system: Communicative outcomes for young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 144–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennott, S., & Bowker A (2009). Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Green, V. A., Payne, D., Son, S., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni G. E. (2009). A comparison of picture exchange and speech-generating devices: Acquisition, preference, and effects of social interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 99–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, R., de Boer-Ott, S., Griswold, D., Myles, B. S., Byrd, S., Ganz, J., …Adams L. G. (2005). Autism spectrum disorders: Interventions and treatments for children and youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Son, S., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni G. E. (2006). Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with autism. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9, 389–395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trottier, N., Kamp, L., & Mirenda P (2011). Effects of peer-mediated instruction to teach use of speech-generating devices to students with autism in social game routines. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 26–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trottier, N., Kamp, L., & Mirenda P (2011). Effects of peer-mediated instruction to teach use of speech-generating devices to students with autism in social game routines. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 26–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar